Edward Awh to Attention
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Awh has written about Attention.
Connection Strength
14.975
-
Object-based encoding constrains storage in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jan; 153(1):86-101.
Score: 0.663
-
Sustained Attention and Spatial Attention Distinctly Influence Long-term Memory Encoding. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 09 01; 33(10):2132-2148.
Score: 0.577
-
Perceptual Grouping Reveals Distinct Roles for Sustained Slow Wave Activity and Alpha Oscillations in Working Memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 06 01; 33(7):1354-1364.
Score: 0.567
-
Covert Attention Increases the Gain of Stimulus-Evoked Population Codes. J Neurosci. 2021 02 24; 41(8):1802-1815.
Score: 0.552
-
Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture. Neuroimage. 2021 02 01; 226:117562.
Score: 0.545
-
Covert Spatial Attention Speeds Target Individuation. J Neurosci. 2020 03 25; 40(13):2717-2726.
Score: 0.518
-
Alpha-band Activity Tracks the Zoom Lens of Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 02; 32(2):272-282.
Score: 0.507
-
Object-based biased competition during covert spatial orienting. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul; 81(5):1366-1385.
Score: 0.496
-
Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory. PLoS Biol. 2019 04; 17(4):e3000239.
Score: 0.490
-
The role of alpha oscillations in spatial attention: limited evidence for a suppression account. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 10; 29:34-40.
Score: 0.474
-
Spatially Selective Alpha Oscillations Reveal Moment-by-Moment Trade-offs between Working Memory and Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 02; 30(2):256-266.
Score: 0.441
-
Alpha-Band Activity Reveals Spontaneous Representations of Spatial Position in Visual Working Memory. Curr Biol. 2017 Oct 23; 27(20):3216-3223.e6.
Score: 0.440
-
Alpha-Band Oscillations Enable Spatially and Temporally Resolved Tracking of Covert Spatial Attention. Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul; 28(7):929-941.
Score: 0.429
-
Feature-Selective Attentional Modulations in Human Frontoparietal Cortex. J Neurosci. 2016 08 03; 36(31):8188-99.
Score: 0.405
-
The role of context in volitional control of feature-based attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Feb; 42(2):213-24.
Score: 0.381
-
Attention: feedback focuses a wandering mind. Nat Neurosci. 2015 Mar; 18(3):327-8.
Score: 0.367
-
Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 10; 26(10):2298-309.
Score: 0.346
-
Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar; 14(1):62-77.
Score: 0.343
-
Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun; 40(3):1022-33.
Score: 0.338
-
Attending multiple items decreases the selectivity of population responses in human primary visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2013 May 29; 33(22):9273-82.
Score: 0.325
-
A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun; 24(6):929-38.
Score: 0.322
-
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug; 16(8):437-43.
Score: 0.306
-
The plateau in mnemonic resolution across large set sizes indicates discrete resource limits in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul; 74(5):891-910.
Score: 0.305
-
Increased sensitivity to perceptual interference in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 May; 18(3):511-20.
Score: 0.299
-
Statistical learning induces discrete shifts in the allocation of working memory resources. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec; 36(6):1419-29.
Score: 0.274
-
Discrete resource allocation in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct; 35(5):1359-67.
Score: 0.252
-
The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychol Res. 2009 Nov; 73(6):794-802.
Score: 0.238
-
Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb; 15(1):215-22.
Score: 0.225
-
Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? J Vis. 2007 Feb 14; 7(2):7.1-23.
Score: 0.210
-
Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Mar; 10(3):124-30.
Score: 0.196
-
Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28; 139(1):201-8.
Score: 0.193
-
Resolving visual interference during covert spatial orienting: online attentional control through static records of prior visual experience. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 May; 134(2):192-206.
Score: 0.186
-
Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting. J Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec; 92(6):3538-45.
Score: 0.176
-
Evidence against a central bottleneck during the attentional blink: multiple channels for configural and featural processing. Cogn Psychol. 2004 Jan; 48(1):95-126.
Score: 0.169
-
Top-down control over biased competition during covert spatial orienting. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb; 29(1):52-63.
Score: 0.159
-
Pupillometry signatures of sustained attention and working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Nov; 84(8):2472-2482.
Score: 0.155
-
Storage in Visual Working Memory Recruits a Content-Independent Pointer System. Psychol Sci. 2022 10; 33(10):1680-1694.
Score: 0.154
-
Evidence for two components of object-based selection. Psychol Sci. 2001 Jul; 12(4):329-34.
Score: 0.142
-
Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory. Cereb Cortex. 2021 06 10; 31(7):3323-3337.
Score: 0.142
-
Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search. J Neurosci. 2021 04 07; 41(14):3180-3191.
Score: 0.139
-
Attention fluctuations impact ongoing maintenance of information in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Dec; 27(6):1269-1278.
Score: 0.137
-
The role of spatial selective attention in working memory for locations: evidence from event-related potentials. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep; 12(5):840-7.
Score: 0.134
-
Evidence for split attentional foci. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr; 26(2):834-46.
Score: 0.131
-
Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 03; 32(3):558-569.
Score: 0.127
-
Real-time triggering reveals concurrent lapses of attention and working memory. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 08; 3(8):808-816.
Score: 0.123
-
Dissecting the Neural Focus of Attention Reveals Distinct Processes for Spatial Attention and Object-Based Storage in Visual Working Memory. Psychol Sci. 2019 04; 30(4):526-540.
Score: 0.121
-
Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 08; 30(8):1185-1196.
Score: 0.114
-
Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory. Cogn Psychol. 2017 09; 97:79-97.
Score: 0.108
-
The capacity to detect synchronous audiovisual events is severely limited: Evidence from mixture modeling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 12; 42(12):2115-2124.
Score: 0.104
-
Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jun; 71:1-26.
Score: 0.085
-
The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item. Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar 01; 24(3):345-51.
Score: 0.080
-
Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 19; 31(3):1128-38.
Score: 0.069
-
Experience-dependent changes in the topography of visual crowding. J Vis. 2009 Oct 14; 9(11):15.1-9.
Score: 0.063
-
The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Jul; 20(2):194-205.
Score: 0.044
-
Rehearsal in spatial working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun; 24(3):780-90.
Score: 0.029
-
Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May; 27(5):853-65.
Score: 0.023
-
Factorial comparison of working memory models. Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan; 121(1):124-49.
Score: 0.021
-
Sleep-dependent learning and practice-dependent deterioration in an orientation discrimination task. Behav Neurosci. 2008 Apr; 122(2):267-72.
Score: 0.014