The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Edward Awh to Attention

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Awh has written about Attention.
Edward Awh
Connection Strength
14.975
Attention
  1. Object-based encoding constrains storage in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jan; 153(1):86-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.663
  2. Sustained Attention and Spatial Attention Distinctly Influence Long-term Memory Encoding. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 09 01; 33(10):2132-2148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.577
  3. Perceptual Grouping Reveals Distinct Roles for Sustained Slow Wave Activity and Alpha Oscillations in Working Memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 06 01; 33(7):1354-1364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.567
  4. Covert Attention Increases the Gain of Stimulus-Evoked Population Codes. J Neurosci. 2021 02 24; 41(8):1802-1815.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.552
  5. Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture. Neuroimage. 2021 02 01; 226:117562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.545
  6. Covert Spatial Attention Speeds Target Individuation. J Neurosci. 2020 03 25; 40(13):2717-2726.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.518
  7. Alpha-band Activity Tracks the Zoom Lens of Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 02; 32(2):272-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.507
  8. Object-based biased competition during covert spatial orienting. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul; 81(5):1366-1385.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.496
  9. Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory. PLoS Biol. 2019 04; 17(4):e3000239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.490
  10. The role of alpha oscillations in spatial attention: limited evidence for a suppression account. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 10; 29:34-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.474
  11. Spatially Selective Alpha Oscillations Reveal Moment-by-Moment Trade-offs between Working Memory and Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 02; 30(2):256-266.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.441
  12. Alpha-Band Activity Reveals Spontaneous Representations of Spatial Position in Visual Working Memory. Curr Biol. 2017 Oct 23; 27(20):3216-3223.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  13. Alpha-Band Oscillations Enable Spatially and Temporally Resolved Tracking of Covert Spatial Attention. Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul; 28(7):929-941.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.429
  14. Feature-Selective Attentional Modulations in Human Frontoparietal Cortex. J Neurosci. 2016 08 03; 36(31):8188-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.405
  15. The role of context in volitional control of feature-based attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Feb; 42(2):213-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.381
  16. Attention: feedback focuses a wandering mind. Nat Neurosci. 2015 Mar; 18(3):327-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.367
  17. Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 10; 26(10):2298-309.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.346
  18. Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar; 14(1):62-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.343
  19. Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun; 40(3):1022-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.338
  20. Attending multiple items decreases the selectivity of population responses in human primary visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2013 May 29; 33(22):9273-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.325
  21. A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun; 24(6):929-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.322
  22. Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug; 16(8):437-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.306
  23. The plateau in mnemonic resolution across large set sizes indicates discrete resource limits in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul; 74(5):891-910.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.305
  24. Increased sensitivity to perceptual interference in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 May; 18(3):511-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.299
  25. Statistical learning induces discrete shifts in the allocation of working memory resources. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec; 36(6):1419-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.274
  26. Discrete resource allocation in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct; 35(5):1359-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.252
  27. The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychol Res. 2009 Nov; 73(6):794-802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.238
  28. Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb; 15(1):215-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.225
  29. Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? J Vis. 2007 Feb 14; 7(2):7.1-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.210
  30. Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Mar; 10(3):124-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  31. Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28; 139(1):201-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  32. Resolving visual interference during covert spatial orienting: online attentional control through static records of prior visual experience. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 May; 134(2):192-206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  33. Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting. J Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec; 92(6):3538-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  34. Evidence against a central bottleneck during the attentional blink: multiple channels for configural and featural processing. Cogn Psychol. 2004 Jan; 48(1):95-126.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  35. Top-down control over biased competition during covert spatial orienting. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb; 29(1):52-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  36. Pupillometry signatures of sustained attention and working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Nov; 84(8):2472-2482.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  37. Storage in Visual Working Memory Recruits a Content-Independent Pointer System. Psychol Sci. 2022 10; 33(10):1680-1694.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  38. Evidence for two components of object-based selection. Psychol Sci. 2001 Jul; 12(4):329-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  39. Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory. Cereb Cortex. 2021 06 10; 31(7):3323-3337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  40. Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search. J Neurosci. 2021 04 07; 41(14):3180-3191.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  41. Attention fluctuations impact ongoing maintenance of information in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Dec; 27(6):1269-1278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  42. The role of spatial selective attention in working memory for locations: evidence from event-related potentials. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep; 12(5):840-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  43. Evidence for split attentional foci. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr; 26(2):834-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  44. Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 03; 32(3):558-569.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  45. Real-time triggering reveals concurrent lapses of attention and working memory. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 08; 3(8):808-816.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  46. Dissecting the Neural Focus of Attention Reveals Distinct Processes for Spatial Attention and Object-Based Storage in Visual Working Memory. Psychol Sci. 2019 04; 30(4):526-540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  47. Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 08; 30(8):1185-1196.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  48. Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory. Cogn Psychol. 2017 09; 97:79-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  49. The capacity to detect synchronous audiovisual events is severely limited: Evidence from mixture modeling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 12; 42(12):2115-2124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  50. Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jun; 71:1-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  51. The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item. Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar 01; 24(3):345-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  52. Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 19; 31(3):1128-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  53. Experience-dependent changes in the topography of visual crowding. J Vis. 2009 Oct 14; 9(11):15.1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  54. The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Jul; 20(2):194-205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  55. Rehearsal in spatial working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun; 24(3):780-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  56. Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May; 27(5):853-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  57. Factorial comparison of working memory models. Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan; 121(1):124-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  58. Sleep-dependent learning and practice-dependent deterioration in an orientation discrimination task. Behav Neurosci. 2008 Apr; 122(2):267-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.