The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Edward Awh to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Awh has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

1.226
  1. Object-based encoding constrains storage in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jan; 153(1):86-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  2. Distinguishing guesses from fuzzy memories: Further evidence for item limits in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul; 85(5):1695-1709.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  3. Is There an Activity-silent Working Memory? J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 11 01; 34(12):2360-2374.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  4. Change localization: A highly reliable and sensitive measure of capacity in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul; 85(5):1681-1694.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  5. Sustained Attention and Spatial Attention Distinctly Influence Long-term Memory Encoding. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 09 01; 33(10):2132-2148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  6. Perceptual Grouping Reveals Distinct Roles for Sustained Slow Wave Activity and Alpha Oscillations in Working Memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 06 01; 33(7):1354-1364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  7. Estimating the statistical power to detect set-size effects in contralateral delay activity. Psychophysiology. 2021 05; 58(5):e13791.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  8. Decoding chromaticity and luminance from patterns of EEG activity. Psychophysiology. 2021 04; 58(4):e13779.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  9. Covert Attention Increases the Gain of Stimulus-Evoked Population Codes. J Neurosci. 2021 02 24; 41(8):1802-1815.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  10. Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture. Neuroimage. 2021 02 01; 226:117562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  11. Multivariate analysis reveals a generalizable human electrophysiological signature of working memory load. Psychophysiology. 2020 12; 57(12):e13691.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  12. Covert Spatial Attention Speeds Target Individuation. J Neurosci. 2020 03 25; 40(13):2717-2726.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  13. Alpha-band Activity Tracks the Zoom Lens of Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 02; 32(2):272-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  14. "Memory compression" effects in visual working memory are contingent on explicit long-term memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Aug; 148(8):1373-1385.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  15. Object-based biased competition during covert spatial orienting. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul; 81(5):1366-1385.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  16. Alpha-band oscillations track the retrieval of precise spatial representations from long-term memory. J Neurophysiol. 2019 08 01; 122(2):539-551.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  17. Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory. PLoS Biol. 2019 04; 17(4):e3000239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  18. The role of alpha oscillations in spatial attention: limited evidence for a suppression account. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 10; 29:34-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  19. Chunking in working memory via content-free labels. Sci Rep. 2018 01 08; 8(1):23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  20. Spatially Selective Alpha Oscillations Reveal Moment-by-Moment Trade-offs between Working Memory and Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 02; 30(2):256-266.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  21. Alpha-Band Activity Reveals Spontaneous Representations of Spatial Position in Visual Working Memory. Curr Biol. 2017 Oct 23; 27(20):3216-3223.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  22. Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory. Cogn Psychol. 2017 09; 97:79-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  23. Alpha-Band Oscillations Enable Spatially and Temporally Resolved Tracking of Covert Spatial Attention. Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul; 28(7):929-941.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  24. Feature-Selective Attentional Modulations in Human Frontoparietal Cortex. J Neurosci. 2016 08 03; 36(31):8188-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  25. Retrieval practice enhances the accessibility but not the quality of memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 06; 23(3):831-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  26. The topography of alpha-band activity tracks the content of spatial working memory. J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan 01; 115(1):168-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  27. The role of context in volitional control of feature-based attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Feb; 42(2):213-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  28. Attention: feedback focuses a wandering mind. Nat Neurosci. 2015 Mar; 18(3):327-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  29. Induced a rhythms track the content and quality of visual working memory representations with high temporal precision. J Neurosci. 2014 May 28; 34(22):7587-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  30. Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 10; 26(10):2298-309.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  31. Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar; 14(1):62-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  32. Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun; 40(3):1022-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  33. Attending multiple items decreases the selectivity of population responses in human primary visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2013 May 29; 33(22):9273-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  34. A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun; 24(6):929-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  35. A neural measure of precision in visual working memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 May; 25(5):754-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  36. Selection and storage of perceptual groups is constrained by a discrete resource in working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun; 39(3):824-835.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  37. Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug; 16(8):437-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  38. The plateau in mnemonic resolution across large set sizes indicates discrete resource limits in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul; 74(5):891-910.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  39. Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing. J Neurosci. 2012 May 23; 32(21):7169-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  40. Increased sensitivity to perceptual interference in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 May; 18(3):511-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  41. Polymorphisms in the 5-HTTLPR gene mediate storage capacity of visual working memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 05; 24(5):1069-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  42. Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 19; 31(3):1128-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  43. Statistical learning induces discrete shifts in the allocation of working memory resources. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec; 36(6):1419-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  44. Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct; 17(5):673-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  45. A bilateral advantage for storage in visual working memory. Cognition. 2010 Oct; 117(1):69-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  46. Spatially global representations in human primary visual cortex during working memory maintenance. J Neurosci. 2009 Dec 02; 29(48):15258-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  47. Experience-dependent changes in the topography of visual crowding. J Vis. 2009 Oct 14; 9(11):15.1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  48. Discrete resource allocation in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct; 35(5):1359-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  49. Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb; 20(2):207-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  50. The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychol Res. 2009 Nov; 73(6):794-802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  51. Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb; 15(1):215-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  52. The bouncer in the brain. Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan; 11(1):5-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  53. Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul; 18(7):622-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  54. Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? J Vis. 2007 Feb 14; 7(2):7.1-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  55. Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Mar; 10(3):124-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  56. Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28; 139(1):201-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  57. Resolving visual interference during covert spatial orienting: online attentional control through static records of prior visual experience. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 May; 134(2):192-206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  58. Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting. J Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec; 92(6):3538-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  59. Evidence against a central bottleneck during the attentional blink: multiple channels for configural and featural processing. Cogn Psychol. 2004 Jan; 48(1):95-126.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  60. Top-down control over biased competition during covert spatial orienting. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb; 29(1):52-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  61. Pupillometry signatures of sustained attention and working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Nov; 84(8):2472-2482.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  62. Storage in Visual Working Memory Recruits a Content-Independent Pointer System. Psychol Sci. 2022 10; 33(10):1680-1694.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  63. Inter-electrode correlations measured with EEG predict individual differences in cognitive ability. Curr Biol. 2021 11 22; 31(22):4998-5008.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  64. Evidence for two components of object-based selection. Psychol Sci. 2001 Jul; 12(4):329-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  65. Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory. Cereb Cortex. 2021 06 10; 31(7):3323-3337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  66. Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search. J Neurosci. 2021 04 07; 41(14):3180-3191.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  67. Attention fluctuations impact ongoing maintenance of information in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Dec; 27(6):1269-1278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  68. The role of spatial selective attention in working memory for locations: evidence from event-related potentials. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep; 12(5):840-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  69. Evidence for split attentional foci. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr; 26(2):834-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  70. Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 03; 32(3):558-569.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  71. The anterior cingulate cortex lends a hand in response selection. Nat Neurosci. 1999 Oct; 2(10):853-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  72. Real-time triggering reveals concurrent lapses of attention and working memory. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 08; 3(8):808-816.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  73. Dissecting the Neural Focus of Attention Reveals Distinct Processes for Spatial Attention and Object-Based Storage in Visual Working Memory. Psychol Sci. 2019 04; 30(4):526-540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  74. Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory. Psychol Bull. 2018 09; 144(9):885-958.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  75. Benchmarks provide common ground for model development: Reply to Logie (2018) and Vandierendonck (2018). Psychol Bull. 2018 09; 144(9):972-977.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  76. Rehearsal in spatial working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun; 24(3):780-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  77. Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 08; 30(8):1185-1196.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  78. The capacity to detect synchronous audiovisual events is severely limited: Evidence from mixture modeling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 12; 42(12):2115-2124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  79. The role of long-term memory in a test of visual working memory: Proactive facilitation but no proactive interference. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 01; 43(1):1-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  80. The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Mar; 62:100-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  81. Human rehearsal processes and the frontal lobes: PET evidence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995 Dec 15; 769:97-117.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  82. Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May; 27(5):853-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  83. Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jun; 71:1-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  84. Factorial comparison of working memory models. Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan; 121(1):124-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  85. The positional-specificity effect reveals a passive-trace contribution to visual short-term memory. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e83483.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  86. The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item. Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar 01; 24(3):345-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  87. Discrete capacity limits in visual working memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr; 20(2):177-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  88. Sleep-dependent learning and practice-dependent deterioration in an orientation discrimination task. Behav Neurosci. 2008 Apr; 122(2):267-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  89. The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Jul; 20(2):194-205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  90. Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nat Neurosci. 2003 May; 6(5):450-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  91. The role of parietal cortex in verbal working memory. J Neurosci. 1998 Jul 01; 18(13):5026-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  92. PET evidence for an amodal verbal working memory system. Neuroimage. 1996 Apr; 3(2):79-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  93. Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET. Nature. 1993 Jun 17; 363(6430):623-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.