Edward Awh to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Awh has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
1.225
-
Distinguishing guesses from fuzzy memories: Further evidence for item limits in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul; 85(5):1695-1709.
Score: 0.031
-
Is There an Activity-silent Working Memory? J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 11 01; 34(12):2360-2374.
Score: 0.030
-
Change localization: A highly reliable and sensitive measure of capacity in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul; 85(5):1681-1694.
Score: 0.030
-
Sustained Attention and Spatial Attention Distinctly Influence Long-term Memory Encoding. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 09 01; 33(10):2132-2148.
Score: 0.028
-
Perceptual Grouping Reveals Distinct Roles for Sustained Slow Wave Activity and Alpha Oscillations in Working Memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 06 01; 33(7):1354-1364.
Score: 0.028
-
Estimating the statistical power to detect set-size effects in contralateral delay activity. Psychophysiology. 2021 05; 58(5):e13791.
Score: 0.027
-
Decoding chromaticity and luminance from patterns of EEG activity. Psychophysiology. 2021 04; 58(4):e13779.
Score: 0.027
-
Covert Attention Increases the Gain of Stimulus-Evoked Population Codes. J Neurosci. 2021 02 24; 41(8):1802-1815.
Score: 0.027
-
Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture. Neuroimage. 2021 02 01; 226:117562.
Score: 0.027
-
Multivariate analysis reveals a generalizable human electrophysiological signature of working memory load. Psychophysiology. 2020 12; 57(12):e13691.
Score: 0.026
-
Covert Spatial Attention Speeds Target Individuation. J Neurosci. 2020 03 25; 40(13):2717-2726.
Score: 0.025
-
Alpha-band Activity Tracks the Zoom Lens of Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 02; 32(2):272-282.
Score: 0.025
-
"Memory compression" effects in visual working memory are contingent on explicit long-term memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Aug; 148(8):1373-1385.
Score: 0.024
-
Object-based biased competition during covert spatial orienting. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul; 81(5):1366-1385.
Score: 0.024
-
Alpha-band oscillations track the retrieval of precise spatial representations from long-term memory. J Neurophysiol. 2019 08 01; 122(2):539-551.
Score: 0.024
-
Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory. PLoS Biol. 2019 04; 17(4):e3000239.
Score: 0.024
-
The role of alpha oscillations in spatial attention: limited evidence for a suppression account. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 10; 29:34-40.
Score: 0.023
-
Chunking in working memory via content-free labels. Sci Rep. 2018 01 08; 8(1):23.
Score: 0.022
-
Spatially Selective Alpha Oscillations Reveal Moment-by-Moment Trade-offs between Working Memory and Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 02; 30(2):256-266.
Score: 0.021
-
Alpha-Band Activity Reveals Spontaneous Representations of Spatial Position in Visual Working Memory. Curr Biol. 2017 Oct 23; 27(20):3216-3223.e6.
Score: 0.021
-
Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory. Cogn Psychol. 2017 09; 97:79-97.
Score: 0.021
-
Alpha-Band Oscillations Enable Spatially and Temporally Resolved Tracking of Covert Spatial Attention. Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul; 28(7):929-941.
Score: 0.021
-
Feature-Selective Attentional Modulations in Human Frontoparietal Cortex. J Neurosci. 2016 08 03; 36(31):8188-99.
Score: 0.020
-
Retrieval practice enhances the accessibility but not the quality of memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 06; 23(3):831-41.
Score: 0.020
-
The topography of alpha-band activity tracks the content of spatial working memory. J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan 01; 115(1):168-77.
Score: 0.019
-
The role of context in volitional control of feature-based attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Feb; 42(2):213-24.
Score: 0.019
-
Attention: feedback focuses a wandering mind. Nat Neurosci. 2015 Mar; 18(3):327-8.
Score: 0.018
-
Induced a rhythms track the content and quality of visual working memory representations with high temporal precision. J Neurosci. 2014 May 28; 34(22):7587-99.
Score: 0.017
-
Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 10; 26(10):2298-309.
Score: 0.017
-
Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar; 14(1):62-77.
Score: 0.017
-
Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun; 40(3):1022-33.
Score: 0.016
-
Attending multiple items decreases the selectivity of population responses in human primary visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2013 May 29; 33(22):9273-82.
Score: 0.016
-
A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun; 24(6):929-38.
Score: 0.016
-
A neural measure of precision in visual working memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 May; 25(5):754-61.
Score: 0.016
-
Selection and storage of perceptual groups is constrained by a discrete resource in working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun; 39(3):824-835.
Score: 0.015
-
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug; 16(8):437-43.
Score: 0.015
-
The plateau in mnemonic resolution across large set sizes indicates discrete resource limits in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul; 74(5):891-910.
Score: 0.015
-
Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing. J Neurosci. 2012 May 23; 32(21):7169-77.
Score: 0.015
-
Increased sensitivity to perceptual interference in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 May; 18(3):511-20.
Score: 0.015
-
Polymorphisms in the 5-HTTLPR gene mediate storage capacity of visual working memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 05; 24(5):1069-76.
Score: 0.014
-
Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 19; 31(3):1128-38.
Score: 0.013
-
Statistical learning induces discrete shifts in the allocation of working memory resources. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec; 36(6):1419-29.
Score: 0.013
-
Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct; 17(5):673-9.
Score: 0.013
-
A bilateral advantage for storage in visual working memory. Cognition. 2010 Oct; 117(1):69-79.
Score: 0.013
-
Spatially global representations in human primary visual cortex during working memory maintenance. J Neurosci. 2009 Dec 02; 29(48):15258-65.
Score: 0.012
-
Experience-dependent changes in the topography of visual crowding. J Vis. 2009 Oct 14; 9(11):15.1-9.
Score: 0.012
-
Discrete resource allocation in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct; 35(5):1359-67.
Score: 0.012
-
Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb; 20(2):207-14.
Score: 0.012
-
The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychol Res. 2009 Nov; 73(6):794-802.
Score: 0.012
-
Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb; 15(1):215-22.
Score: 0.011
-
The bouncer in the brain. Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan; 11(1):5-6.
Score: 0.011
-
Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul; 18(7):622-8.
Score: 0.011
-
Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? J Vis. 2007 Feb 14; 7(2):7.1-23.
Score: 0.010
-
Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Mar; 10(3):124-30.
Score: 0.010
-
Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28; 139(1):201-8.
Score: 0.009
-
Resolving visual interference during covert spatial orienting: online attentional control through static records of prior visual experience. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 May; 134(2):192-206.
Score: 0.009
-
Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting. J Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec; 92(6):3538-45.
Score: 0.009
-
Evidence against a central bottleneck during the attentional blink: multiple channels for configural and featural processing. Cogn Psychol. 2004 Jan; 48(1):95-126.
Score: 0.008
-
Top-down control over biased competition during covert spatial orienting. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb; 29(1):52-63.
Score: 0.008
-
Pupillometry signatures of sustained attention and working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Nov; 84(8):2472-2482.
Score: 0.008
-
Storage in Visual Working Memory Recruits a Content-Independent Pointer System. Psychol Sci. 2022 10; 33(10):1680-1694.
Score: 0.008
-
Inter-electrode correlations measured with EEG predict individual differences in cognitive ability. Curr Biol. 2021 11 22; 31(22):4998-5008.e6.
Score: 0.007
-
Evidence for two components of object-based selection. Psychol Sci. 2001 Jul; 12(4):329-34.
Score: 0.007
-
Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory. Cereb Cortex. 2021 06 10; 31(7):3323-3337.
Score: 0.007
-
Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search. J Neurosci. 2021 04 07; 41(14):3180-3191.
Score: 0.007
-
Attention fluctuations impact ongoing maintenance of information in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Dec; 27(6):1269-1278.
Score: 0.007
-
The role of spatial selective attention in working memory for locations: evidence from event-related potentials. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep; 12(5):840-7.
Score: 0.007
-
Evidence for split attentional foci. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr; 26(2):834-46.
Score: 0.006
-
Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 03; 32(3):558-569.
Score: 0.006
-
The anterior cingulate cortex lends a hand in response selection. Nat Neurosci. 1999 Oct; 2(10):853-4.
Score: 0.006
-
Real-time triggering reveals concurrent lapses of attention and working memory. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 08; 3(8):808-816.
Score: 0.006
-
Dissecting the Neural Focus of Attention Reveals Distinct Processes for Spatial Attention and Object-Based Storage in Visual Working Memory. Psychol Sci. 2019 04; 30(4):526-540.
Score: 0.006
-
Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory. Psychol Bull. 2018 09; 144(9):885-958.
Score: 0.006
-
Benchmarks provide common ground for model development: Reply to Logie (2018) and Vandierendonck (2018). Psychol Bull. 2018 09; 144(9):972-977.
Score: 0.006
-
Rehearsal in spatial working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun; 24(3):780-90.
Score: 0.006
-
Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 08; 30(8):1185-1196.
Score: 0.006
-
The capacity to detect synchronous audiovisual events is severely limited: Evidence from mixture modeling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 12; 42(12):2115-2124.
Score: 0.005
-
The role of long-term memory in a test of visual working memory: Proactive facilitation but no proactive interference. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 01; 43(1):1-22.
Score: 0.005
-
The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Mar; 62:100-8.
Score: 0.005
-
Human rehearsal processes and the frontal lobes: PET evidence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995 Dec 15; 769:97-117.
Score: 0.005
-
Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May; 27(5):853-65.
Score: 0.004
-
Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jun; 71:1-26.
Score: 0.004
-
Factorial comparison of working memory models. Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan; 121(1):124-49.
Score: 0.004
-
The positional-specificity effect reveals a passive-trace contribution to visual short-term memory. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e83483.
Score: 0.004
-
The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item. Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar 01; 24(3):345-51.
Score: 0.004
-
Discrete capacity limits in visual working memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr; 20(2):177-82.
Score: 0.003
-
Sleep-dependent learning and practice-dependent deterioration in an orientation discrimination task. Behav Neurosci. 2008 Apr; 122(2):267-72.
Score: 0.003
-
The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Jul; 20(2):194-205.
Score: 0.002
-
Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nat Neurosci. 2003 May; 6(5):450-2.
Score: 0.002
-
The role of parietal cortex in verbal working memory. J Neurosci. 1998 Jul 01; 18(13):5026-34.
Score: 0.001
-
PET evidence for an amodal verbal working memory system. Neuroimage. 1996 Apr; 3(2):79-88.
Score: 0.001
-
Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET. Nature. 1993 Jun 17; 363(6430):623-5.
Score: 0.001