The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Ted Skolarus to Prostatic Neoplasms

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Ted Skolarus has written about Prostatic Neoplasms.
Ted Skolarus
Connection Strength
13.338
Prostatic Neoplasms
  1. Primary Care Physician and Urologist Perspectives on Optimizing Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. Ann Fam Med. 2024 Jan-Feb; 22(1):5-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.412
  2. National Long-term Survival Estimates After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer. Urology. 2024 02; 184:135-141.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.408
  3. Outcomes after definitive radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer in a national health care delivery system. Cancer. 2023 10 15; 129(20):3326-3333.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.398
  4. Understanding the Role of Urology Practice Organization and Racial Composition in Prostate Cancer Treatment Disparities. JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 05; 19(5):e763-e772.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.386
  5. Better Understanding the Timing Of Androgen Deprivation Trial Outcomes: Impacts of Prior Androgen Deprivation Therapy. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022 05 02; 6(3).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.367
  6. Prostate cancer clinical trial completion: The role of geography. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 12; 111:106600.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.354
  7. Association between PSA values and surveillance quality after prostate cancer surgery. Cancer Med. 2019 12; 8(18):7903-7912.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.309
  8. Determinants of quality prostate cancer survivorship care across the primary and specialty care interface: Lessons from the Veterans Health Administration. Cancer Med. 2019 05; 8(5):2686-2702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.297
  9. Self-Management in Long-Term Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019 05 20; 37(15):1326-1335.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.296
  10. De-implementation of low value castration for men with prostate cancer: protocol for a theory-based, mixed methods approach to minimizing low value androgen deprivation therapy (DeADT). Implement Sci. 2018 11 29; 13(1):144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.290
  11. Characterising potential bone scan overuse amongst men treated with radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2019 07; 124(1):55-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.289
  12. Castration remains despite decreasing definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer in the elderly: A case for de-implementation. Cancer. 2018 10 15; 124(20):3971-3974.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.285
  13. The implications of baseline bone-health assessment at initiation of androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2018 04; 121(4):558-564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.270
  14. Multilingual Self-Management Resources for Prostate Cancer Survivors and Their Partners: Results of a Long-Term Academic-State Health Department Partnership to Promote Survivorship Care. Urology. 2017 Dec; 110:92-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.262
  15. Enhancing prostate cancer survivorship care through self-management. Urol Oncol. 2017 09; 35(9):564-568.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.262
  16. Optimizing veteran-centered prostate cancer survivorship care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 04 18; 18(1):181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.259
  17. Implications of Prostate Cancer Treatment in Men With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Urology. 2017 06; 104:131-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.255
  18. Providing prostate cancer survivorship care in Japan: Implications from the USA care model. Int J Urol. 2016 11; 23(11):906-915.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.249
  19. Re: Neil E. Martin, Laura Massey, Caleb Stowell, et al. Defining a Standard Set of Patient-centered Outcomes for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2015;67:460-7. Eur Urol. 2016 06; 69(6):e125-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.239
  20. Symptom burden and information needs in prostate cancer survivors: a case for tailored long-term survivorship care. BJU Int. 2016 09; 118(3):372-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  21. Editorial comment. Urology. 2015 Mar; 85(3):627-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  22. Minimally important difference for the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form. Urology. 2015 Jan; 85(1):101-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  23. Androgen-deprivation-associated bone disease. Curr Opin Urol. 2014 Nov; 24(6):601-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  24. American Cancer Society prostate cancer survivorship care guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jul-Aug; 64(4):225-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  25. Quality of prostate cancer care among rural men in the Veterans Health Administration. Cancer. 2013 Oct 15; 119(20):3629-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  26. Editorial comment. Urology. 2013 Apr; 81(4):751.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  27. Evidence of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy specimen and survival after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2013 Feb; 81(2):354-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  28. Monitoring quality of life among prostate cancer survivors: the feasibility of automated telephone assessment. Urology. 2012 Nov; 80(5):1021-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  29. Understanding fragmentation of prostate cancer survivorship care: implications for cost and quality. Cancer. 2012 Jun 01; 118(11):2837-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  30. Primary care perspectives on prostate cancer survivorship: implications for improving quality of care. Urol Oncol. 2013 Aug; 31(6):727-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  31. Primary care perspectives on prostate cancer screening. Nurse Pract. 2011 Jun; 36(6):39-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  32. Understanding early functional recovery after robotic prostatectomy. Surg Innov. 2012 Mar; 19(1):5-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  33. The delivery of prostate cancer care in the United States: implications for delivery system reform. J Urol. 2010 Dec; 184(6):2279-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  34. Does robotic technology mitigate the challenges of large prostate size? Urology. 2010 Nov; 76(5):1117-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  35. The economic burden of prostate cancer survivorship care. J Urol. 2010 Aug; 184(2):532-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  36. The effect of body mass index on PSA levels and the development, screening and treatment of prostate cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007 Nov; 4(11):605-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  37. Hormonal Therapy and Radiation Therapy in Prostate Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From a Trial Evaluating Combined Androgen Blockade With 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors as an Alternative to Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonists. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Aug; 22(4):102103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  38. Patient perspectives on factors influencing active surveillance adherence for low-risk prostate cancer: A qualitative study. Cancer Med. 2024 Jan; 13(1):e6847.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  39. Comparing Patient-reported Functional Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy in Historical and Contemporary Practice. J Urol. 2023 Nov; 210(5):771-777.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  40. Mapping European Association of Urology Guideline Practice Across Europe: An Audit of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Use Before Prostate Cancer Surgery in 6598 Cases in 187 Hospitals Across 31 European Countries. Eur Urol. 2023 05; 83(5):393-401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  41. Guidelines for Sexual Health Care for Prostate Cancer Patients: Recommendations of an International Panel. J Sex Med. 2022 11; 19(11):1655-1669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  42. Exploring Variation in the Receipt of Recommended Active Surveillance for Men with Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2022 09; 208(3):600-608.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  43. Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures into health care for men with localized prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2022 05; 19(5):263-279.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  44. Comparison of the treatment of men with prostate cancer between the US and England: an international population-based study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 06; 26(2):287-292.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  45. Urinary incontinence and use of incontinence surgery after radical prostatectomy: a national study using patient-reported outcomes. BJU Int. 2022 07; 130(1):84-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  46. TrueNTH Sexual Recovery Intervention for couples coping with prostate cancer: Randomized controlled trial results. Cancer. 2022 Apr 01; 128(7):1513-1522.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  47. Developing a Patient-Centered Model of Prostate Cancer Care: Patient Satisfaction With a Survivorship Program Embedded in Urologic-Oncologic Care. Urology. 2022 02; 160:161-167.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  48. Improving Guideline Adherence in Urology. Eur Urol Focus. 2022 09; 8(5):1545-1552.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  49. Using an Automated Electronic Health Record Score To Estimate Life Expectancy In Men Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer In The Veterans Health Administration. Urology. 2021 09; 155:70-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  50. Understanding Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 11; 17(11):e1678-e1687.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  51. Urology Workforce Changes and Implications for Prostate Cancer Care Among Medicare Enrollees. Urology. 2021 09; 155:77-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  52. Primary Care Providers' Perceptions About Participating in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 02; 36(2):447-454.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  53. Reconsidering the Trade-offs of Prostate Cancer Screening. N Engl J Med. 2020 09 24; 383(13):1289-1290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  54. Adherence and out-of-pocket costs among Medicare beneficiaries who are prescribed oral targeted therapies for advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. 2020 12 01; 126(23):5050-5059.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  55. Life expectancy estimates for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in the Veterans Health Administration. Urol Oncol. 2020 09; 38(9):734.e1-734.e10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  56. Reply by Authors. J Urol. 2020 02; 203(2):421.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  57. Practice-Level Adoption of Conservative Management for Prostate Cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2019 10; 15(10):e863-e869.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  58. External Validation of the Prostate Cancer Specific Comorbidity Index: A Claims Based Tool for the Prediction of Life Expectancy in Men with Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2019 09; 202(3):518-524.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  59. Urologist Practice Structure and Spending for Prostate Cancer Care. Urology. 2019 Aug; 130:65-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  60. Variation in prostate cancer treatment and spending among Medicare shared savings program accountable care organizations. Cancer. 2018 08; 124(16):3364-3371.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  61. Impact of Accountable Care Organizations on Diagnostic Testing for Prostate Cancer. Urology. 2018 06; 116:68-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  62. The Research Implications of Prostate Specific Antigen Registry Errors: Data from the Veterans Health Administration. J Urol. 2018 09; 200(3):541-548.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  63. Dissecting Surgeon Behavior: Leveraging the Theoretical Domains Framework to Facilitate Evidence-based Surgical Practice. Ann Surg. 2018 03; 267(3):432-434.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  64. Patient-Reported Sexual Aid Utilization and Efficacy After Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 06 01; 101(2):376-386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  65. Early effect of Medicare Shared Savings Program accountable care organization participation on prostate cancer care. Cancer. 2018 02 01; 124(3):563-570.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  66. TrueNTH sexual recovery study protocol: a multi-institutional collaborative approach to developing and testing a web-based intervention for couples coping with the side-effects of prostate cancer treatment in a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2017 Oct 02; 17(1):664.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  67. Urologist Practice Affiliation and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in the Elderly. Eur Urol. 2018 04; 73(4):491-498.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  68. Functional Outcomes Following Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy Augmented with Seminal Vesicle Sparing Compared to Standard Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Urol. 2017 09; 198(3):600-607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  69. Sharp Decline In Prostate Cancer Treatment Among Men In The General Population, But Not Among Diagnosed Men. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 01 01; 36(1):108-115.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  70. Accuracy of Prostate-Specific Antigen Values in Prostate Cancer Registries. J Clin Oncol. 2016 10 10; 34(29):3586-3587.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  71. Implications of evolving delivery system reforms for prostate cancer care. Am J Manag Care. 2016 Sep; 22(9):569-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  72. Health Care Integration and Quality among Men with Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2017 01; 197(1):55-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  73. Negative information-seeking experiences of long-term prostate cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2016 12; 10(6):1089-1095.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  74. Standardizing the definition of adverse pathology for lower risk men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2016 09; 34(9):415.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  75. Limitations of Prostate-specific Antigen Testing After a Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. Eur Urol. 2016 08; 70(2):209-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  76. Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2016. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 01; 14(1):19-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  77. Expectant management of veterans with early-stage prostate cancer. Cancer. 2016 Feb 15; 122(4):626-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  78. Preparing Patients and Partners for Recovery From the Side Effects of Prostate Cancer Surgery: A Group Approach. Urology. 2016 Feb; 88:36-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  79. Patient-reported quality of life after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2015 Aug; 116(2):179-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  80. Are we targeting the right outcome for sexual health after prostate cancer treatment? Eur Urol. 2015 Oct; 68(4):550-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  81. Survivorship and improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015 Sep; 68(3):374-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  82. Reducing PSA-Based Prostate Cancer Screening in Men Aged?75 Years and Older with the Use of Highly Specific Computerized Clinical Decision Support. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug; 30(8):1133-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  83. What couples say about their recovery of sexual intimacy after prostatectomy: toward the development of a conceptual model of couples' sexual recovery after surgery for prostate cancer. J Sex Med. 2015 Feb; 12(2):494-504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  84. Technology diffusion and prostate cancer quality of care. Urology. 2014 Nov; 84(5):1066-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  85. Understanding the relationship between tumor size, gland size, and disease aggressiveness in men with prostate cancer. Urology. 2014 Aug; 84(2):373-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  86. Exploring the role of the partner in couples' sexual recovery after surgery for prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2014 Sep; 22(9):2509-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  87. Adherence to performance measures and outcomes among men treated for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2014 Sep; 192(3):743-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  88. Validating electronic cancer quality measures at Veterans Health Administration. Am J Manag Care. 2014; 20(12):1041-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  89. Regional variation in quality of prostate cancer care. J Urol. 2014 Apr; 191(4):957-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  90. Use of advanced treatment technologies among men at low risk of dying from prostate cancer. JAMA. 2013 Jun 26; 309(24):2587-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  91. Technology diffusion and diagnostic testing for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2013 Nov; 190(5):1715-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  92. Managed care and the diffusion of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Urology. 2012 Dec; 80(6):1236-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  93. Certificate of need legislation and the dissemination of robotic surgery for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2013 Jan; 189(1):80-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  94. Certificate of need regulations and the diffusion of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Urology. 2012 Nov; 80(5):1015-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  95. Comparative effectiveness of external-beam radiation approaches for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan; 65(1):162-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  96. Growth of high-cost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer raises concerns about overuse. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Apr; 31(4):750-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  97. Editorial comment. Urology. 2011 Feb; 77(2):279.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  98. Understanding prostate cancer spending growth among Medicare beneficiaries. Urology. 2011 Feb; 77(2):326-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.