 Connection
Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Mitchell C. Posner and Vivek N. Prachand.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.936 |
|
|
|
-
Prachand V, Tseng J, Milner R, Posner M, Matthews J. Web-Based Medically Necessary, Time-Sensitive (MeNTS) Procedure Scoring Worksheet: In Reply to Ing and Ing. J Am Coll Surg. 2020 09; 231(3):407.
Score: 0.216
-
Prachand VN, Milner R, Angelos P, Posner MC, Fung JJ, Agrawal N, Jeevanandam V, Matthews JB. Medically Necessary, Time-Sensitive Procedures: Scoring System to Ethically and Efficiently Manage Resource Scarcity and Provider Risk During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Aug; 231(2):281-288.
Score: 0.212
-
Catenacci DVT, Chase L, Lomnicki S, Karrison T, de Wilton Marsh R, Rampurwala MM, Narula S, Alpert L, Setia N, Xiao SY, Hart J, Siddiqui UD, Peterson B, Moore K, Kipping-Johnson K, Markevicius U, Gordon B, Allen K, Racette C, Maron SB, Liao CY, Polite BN, Kindler HL, Turaga K, Prachand VN, Roggin KK, Ferguson MK, Posner MC. Evaluation of the Association of Perioperative UGT1A1 Genotype-Dosed gFOLFIRINOX With Margin-Negative Resection Rates and Pathologic Response Grades Among Patients With Locally Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 02 05; 3(2):e1921290.
Score: 0.210
-
Gyawali B, Parsad S, Feinberg BA, Nabhan C. Real-World Evidence and Randomized Studies in the Precision Oncology Era: The Right Balance. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Nov; 1:1-5.
Score: 0.045
-
Gyawali B, Parsad S, Feinberg BA, Nabhan C. Real-World Evidence and Randomized Studies in the Precision Oncology Era: The Right Balance. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Nov; 1:1-5.
Score: 0.045
-
Wightman SC, Posner MC, Patti MG, Ganai S, Watson S, Prachand V, Ferguson MK. Extremes of body mass index and postoperative complications after esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2017 May 01; 30(5):1-6.
Score: 0.043
-
Brar SS, Mahar AL, Helyer LK, Swallow C, Law C, Paszat L, Seevaratnam R, Cardoso R, McLeod R, Dixon M, Yohanathan L, Lourenco LG, Bocicariu A, Bekaii-Saab T, Chau I, Church N, Coit D, Crane CH, Earle C, Mansfield P, Marcon N, Miner T, Noh SH, Porter G, Posner MC, Prachand V, Sano T, van de Velde C, Wong S, Coburn NG. Processes of care in the multidisciplinary treatment of gastric cancer: results of a RAND/UCLA expert panel. JAMA Surg. 2014 Jan; 149(1):18-25.
Score: 0.034
-
Coburn N, Seevaratnam R, Paszat L, Helyer L, Law C, Swallow C, Cardosa R, Mahar A, Lourenco LG, Dixon M, Bekaii-Saab T, Chau I, Church N, Coit D, Crane CH, Earle C, Mansfield P, Marcon N, Miner T, Noh SH, Porter G, Posner MC, Prachand V, Sano T, van de Velde C, Wong S, McLeod R. Optimal management of gastric cancer: results from an international RAND/UCLA expert panel. Ann Surg. 2014 Jan; 259(1):102-8.
Score: 0.034
-
Brar S, Law C, McLeod R, Helyer L, Swallow C, Paszat L, Seevaratnam R, Cardoso R, Dixon M, Mahar A, Lourenco LG, Yohanathan L, Bocicariu A, Bekaii-Saab T, Chau I, Church N, Coit D, Crane CH, Earle C, Mansfield P, Marcon N, Miner T, Noh SH, Porter G, Posner MC, Prachand V, Sano T, van de Velde C, Wong S, Coburn N. Defining surgical quality in gastric cancer: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness study. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Aug; 217(2):347-57.e1.
Score: 0.033
-
Ganai S, Prachand VN, Posner MC, Alverdy JC, Choi E, Hussain M, Waxman I, Patti MG, Roggin KK. Predictors of unsuccessful laparoscopic resection of gastric submucosal neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb; 17(2):244-55; discussion 255-6.
Score: 0.032
-
Dixon M, Seevaratnam R, Wirtzfeld D, McLeod R, Helyer L, Law C, Swallow C, Paszat L, Bocicariu A, Cardoso R, Mahar A, Bekaii-Saab T, Chau I, Church N, Coit D, Crane CH, Earle C, Mansfield P, Marcon N, Miner T, Noh SH, Porter G, Posner MC, Prachand V, Sano T, Van de Velde CJ, Wong S, Coburn N. A RAND/UCLA appropriateness study of the management of familial gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb; 20(2):533-41.
Score: 0.031
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|