The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Scott E. Eggener to Aged

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Scott E. Eggener has written about Aged.
Scott E. Eggener
Connection Strength
2.151
Aged
  1. Amount of Gleason Pattern 3 Is Not Predictive of Risk in Grade Group 2-4 Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2024 Jul; 86(1):1-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  2. Prostate Cancer Outcomes Following Solid-Organ Transplantation: A SEER-Medicare Analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 08 01; 112(8):847-854.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  3. A 17-gene Panel for Prediction of Adverse Prostate Cancer Pathologic Features: Prospective Clinical Validation and Utility. Urology. 2019 04; 126:76-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  4. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes for Rectal Injury During Radical Prostatectomy: A Population-based Study. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 12; 1(6):501-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  5. Can Focal Treatment Replace Radical Treatment in Prostate Cancer? For Focal Therapy. Eur Urol Focus. 2017 12; 3(6):522-523.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  6. Contemporary management of men with high-risk localized prostate cancer in the United States. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 09; 20(3):283-288.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  7. Impact of Perioperative Infection on Cancer Specific Survival after Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Urol. 2017 11; 198(5):1027-1032.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  8. Prostate cancer detection following diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation. Can J Urol. 2017 Apr; 24(2):8714-8720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  9. Extraprostatic Extension Is Extremely Rare for Contemporary Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2017 09; 72(3):455-460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  10. Risk of lymph node metastases in pathological gleason score=6 prostate adenocarcinoma: Analysis of institutional and population-based databases. Urol Oncol. 2017 01; 35(1):31.e1-31.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  11. Phase II Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2016 12; 196(6):1670-1675.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  12. The Impact of Perioperative Aspirin on Bleeding Complications Following Robotic Partial Nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2016 09; 30(9):997-1003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  13. Patient-Initiated Prostate Cancer Screening Among Older U.S. Men. Ann Intern Med. 2016 05 17; 164(10):702-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  14. Comparison of Perioperative and Early Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in a Contemporary Population Based Cohort. J Urol. 2016 07; 196(1):76-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  15. National Economic Conditions and Patient Insurance Status Predict Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Rates and Management Decisions. J Urol. 2016 May; 195(5):1383-1389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  16. Prostate Cancer Screening. JAMA. 2015 Aug 25; 314(8):825-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  17. Contemporary Population-Based Comparison of Localized Ductal Adenocarcinoma and High-Risk Acinar Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate. Urology. 2015 Oct; 86(4):777-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  18. National Prostate Cancer Screening Rates After the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Discouraging Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 01; 33(22):2416-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  19. Population-based analysis of salvage radical prostatectomy with examination of factors associated with adverse perioperative outcomes. Urol Oncol. 2015 Apr; 33(4):163.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  20. Population based analysis of incidence and predictors of open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2015 Mar; 193(3):826-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  21. Pathologic outcomes for low-risk prostate cancer after delayed radical prostatectomy in the United States. Urol Oncol. 2015 Apr; 33(4):164.e11-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  22. National trends in the management of low and intermediate risk prostate cancer in the United States. J Urol. 2015 Jan; 193(1):95-102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  23. Population-based analysis of treatment modalities and survival for clinically localized small-cell carcinoma of the prostate. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014 Sep; 17(3):286-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  24. Impact of warm versus cold ischemia on renal function following partial nephrectomy. World J Urol. 2015 Mar; 33(3):351-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  25. Ongoing Gleason grade migration in localized prostate cancer and implications for use of active surveillance. Eur Urol. 2014 Oct; 66(4):611-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  26. National trends in prostate cancer screening among older American men with limited 9-year life expectancies: evidence of an increased need for shared decision making. Cancer. 2014 May 15; 120(10):1491-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  27. Empiric antibiotics for an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level: a randomised, prospective, controlled multi-institutional trial. BJU Int. 2013 Nov; 112(7):925-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  28. MR imaging-guided focal laser ablation for prostate cancer: phase I trial. Radiology. 2013 Jun; 267(3):932-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  29. A multi-institutional evaluation of active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2013 Jan; 189(1 Suppl):S19-25; discussion S25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  30. 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations and prostate cancer screening rates. JAMA. 2012 Apr 25; 307(16):1692-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  31. Hazard of prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2012 Jan; 187(1):124-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  32. Cause-specific mortality following radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012 Mar; 15(1):106-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  33. Population-based patterns and predictors of prostate-specific antigen screening among older men in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 01; 29(13):1736-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  34. Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2011 Mar; 185(3):869-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  35. Chronic kidney disease before and after partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2011 Jan; 185(1):43-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  36. Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration versus Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations for renal function evaluation in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2010 Nov; 184(5):1867-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  37. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence. J Urol. 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  38. Comparison of models to predict clinical failure after radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 2009 Jan 15; 115(2):303-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  39. Prediagnosis prostate specific antigen velocity is associated with risk of prostate cancer progression following brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy. J Urol. 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 1):1399-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  40. Renal cell carcinoma recurrence after nephrectomy for localized disease: predicting survival from time of recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 01; 24(19):3101-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  41. Predictors of subsequent prostate cancer in men with a prostate specific antigen of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/ml and an initially negative biopsy. J Urol. 2005 Aug; 174(2):500-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  42. Contemporary survival results and the role of radiation therapy in patients with node negative seminal vesicle invasion following radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005 Apr; 173(4):1150-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  43. Stockholm3 in a Multiethnic Cohort for Prostate Cancer Detection (SEPTA): A Prospective Multicentered Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Nov 10; 42(32):3806-3816.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  44. Hormonal Therapy and Radiation Therapy in Prostate Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From a Trial Evaluating Combined Androgen Blockade With 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors as an Alternative to Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonists. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Aug; 22(4):102103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  45. Free PSA and Clinically Significant and Fatal Prostate Cancer in the PLCO Screening Trial. J Urol. 2023 10; 210(4):630-638.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  46. A population-based evaluation of tunica vaginalis mesothelioma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database. Urol Oncol. 2023 01; 41(1):52.e11-52.e20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  47. Hematuria following Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy: Incidence Increases with Long-Term Followup. J Urol. 2022 06; 207(6):1236-1245.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  48. Clinical and pathological features of renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma (PEComa): A single institution series. Urol Oncol. 2022 02; 40(2):18-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  49. Pathological characteristics of the large renal mass: potential implication for clinical role of renal biopsy. Can J Urol. 2021 04; 28(2):10620-10624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  50. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2021 Mar; 205(3):769-779.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  51. Patient-reported Outcomes and Late Toxicity After Postprostatectomy Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy. Eur Urol. 2019 11; 76(5):686-692.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  52. Metastatic prostate cancer at diagnosis and through progression in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Cancer. 2019 09 01; 125(17):2965-2974.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  53. Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by Use of MRI-Derived Quantitative Risk Maps: A Feasibility Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 08; 213(2):W66-W75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  54. Multi-institutional Clinical Tool for Predicting High-risk Lesions on 3Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 05; 2(3):257-264.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  55. Comparison of T2-Weighted Imaging, DWI, and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Calculation of Prostate Cancer Index Lesion Volume: Correlation With Whole-Mount Pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 02; 212(2):351-356.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  56. Evaluation of Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer Using High Spectral and Spatial Resolution Imaging: A Pilot Study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 05; 49(5):1374-1380.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  57. Feasibility of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Low-Dose Gadolinium: Comparative Performance With Standard Dose in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. Invest Radiol. 2018 10; 53(10):609-615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  58. Predominantly cystic clear cell renal cell carcinoma and multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential form a low-grade spectrum. Virchows Arch. 2018 Jul; 473(1):85-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  59. No Effect of Music on Anxiety and Pain During Transrectal Prostate Biopsies: A Randomized Trial. Urology. 2018 Jul; 117:31-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  60. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10; 378(19):1767-1777.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  61. Contemporary Incidence and Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Lymph Node Metastases. J Urol. 2018 06; 199(6):1510-1517.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  62. Role of Genetic Testing for Inherited Prostate Cancer Risk: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2017. J Clin Oncol. 2018 02 01; 36(4):414-424.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  63. Nerve Bundle Hydrodissection and Sexual Function after Robot Prostatectomy. JSLS. 2017 Oct-Dec; 21(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  64. Variability in Outcomes for Patients with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer (Gleason Score 7, International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Group 2-3) and Implications for Risk Stratification: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus. 2017 10; 3(4-5):487-497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  65. Increasing incidence of metastatic prostate cancer in the United States (2004-2013). Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 12; 19(4):395-397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  66. The impact of days off between cases on perioperative outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2016 Feb; 34(2):269-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  67. Corneal abrasion in hysterectomy and prostatectomy: role of laparoscopic and robotic assistance. Anesthesiology. 2015 May; 122(5):994-1001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  68. Robotic-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: frequency of nodal metastases and oncological outcomes. World J Urol. 2015 Nov; 33(11):1689-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  69. Preoperative nuclear renal scan underestimates renal function after radical nephrectomy. Urology. 2014 Dec; 84(6):1402-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  70. Focal therapy: patients, interventions, and outcomes--a report from a consensus meeting. Eur Urol. 2015 Apr; 67(4):771-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  71. The impact of body mass index on renal functional outcomes following minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2014 Nov; 28(11):1338-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  72. Metastatic small cell carcinoma of the prostate: Population-based analysis of patient characteristics and treatment paradigms. Urol Oncol. 2015 Feb; 33(2):70.e1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  73. Population-based assessment of prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer in the elderly. Urol Oncol. 2015 Feb; 33(2):69.e29-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  74. Effect of depression on diagnosis, treatment, and mortality of men with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 10; 32(23):2471-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  75. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging features of the normal central zone of the prostate. Acad Radiol. 2014 May; 21(5):569-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  76. Apparent diffusion coefficient for prostate cancer imaging: impact of B values. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar; 202(3):W247-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  77. Validation of quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images for prostate cancer detection and aggressiveness assessment: a cross-imager study. Radiology. 2014 May; 271(2):461-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  78. The volume of nonneoplastic parenchyma in a minimally invasive partial nephrectomy specimen: predictive factors and impact on renal function. J Endourol. 2014 Feb; 28(2):196-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  79. Prostate volumes derived from MRI and volume-adjusted serum prostate-specific antigen: correlation with Gleason score of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Nov; 201(5):1041-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  80. Revisiting the central gland anatomy via MRI: does the central gland extend below the level of verumontanum? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jan; 39(1):167-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  81. Early discharge after laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy: care pathway evaluation. BJU Int. 2014 Apr; 113(4):592-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  82. Do margins matter? The influence of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer-specific mortality. Eur Urol. 2014 Apr; 65(4):675-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  83. Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: evaluation by using multiparametric endorectal MR imaging. Radiology. 2013 Jun; 267(3):797-806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  84. Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study. Radiology. 2013 Jun; 267(3):787-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  85. Differential use of partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity tumors may explain variability in reported utilization rates. J Urol. 2013 Jun; 189(6):2047-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  86. Short (= 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  87. Evaluation of the prostate bed for local recurrence after radical prostatectomy using endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Feb 01; 85(2):378-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  88. Local staging of prostate cancer with MRI. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012 Jul-Aug; 18(4):365-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  89. High-grade ureteroscopic biopsy is associated with advanced pathology of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma tumors at definitive surgical resection. J Endourol. 2012 Apr; 26(4):398-402.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  90. Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec; 197(6):1382-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  91. High-resolution MRI of excised human prostate specimens acquired with 9.4T in detection and identification of cancers: validation of a technique. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct; 34(4):956-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  92. Multi-institutional validation of the ability of preoperative hydronephrosis to predict advanced pathologic tumor stage in upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2013 Aug; 31(6):904-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  93. Clinical and histologic predictors of renal function decline after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2011 Sep; 25(9):1435-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  94. Urinary cytology has a poor performance for predicting invasive or high-grade upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int. 2011 Sep; 108(5):701-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  95. Gleason 6 prostate cancer in one or two biopsy cores can harbor more aggressive disease. J Endourol. 2011 Apr; 25(4):699-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  96. Histopathological predictors of renal function decrease after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol. 2010 Nov; 184(5):1872-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  97. Preoperative hydronephrosis, ureteroscopic biopsy grade and urinary cytology can improve prediction of advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Urol. 2010 Jul; 184(1):69-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  98. Orthotopic neobladder versus Indiana pouch in women: a comparison of health related quality of life outcomes. J Urol. 2010 Jan; 183(1):201-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  99. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a single-center evolving experience. Urology. 2010 Feb; 75(2):282-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  100. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: predictors of prolonged warm ischemia. J Urol. 2009 Sep; 182(3):860-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  101. A single microfocus (5% or less) of Gleason 6 prostate cancer at biopsy--can we predict adverse pathological outcomes? J Urol. 2008 Dec; 180(6):2436-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  102. Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance. J Urol. 2008 Nov; 180(5):1964-7; discussion 1967-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  103. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol. 2008 Jun; 179(6):2158-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  104. Secondary therapy, metastatic progression, and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008 May; 53(5):950-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  105. Association of cysteine-rich secretory protein 3 and beta-microseminoprotein with outcome after radical prostatectomy. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jul 15; 13(14):4130-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  106. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized, high risk prostate cancer: critical analysis of risk assessment methods. J Urol. 2007 Aug; 178(2):493-9; discussion 499.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  107. Perioperative clinical thromboembolic events after radical or partial nephrectomy. Urology. 2006 Nov; 68(5):988-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  108. Survival results in patients with screen-detected prostate cancer versus physician-referred patients treated with radical prostatectomy: early results. Urol Oncol. 2006 Nov-Dec; 24(6):465-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  109. The natural history of noncastrate metastatic prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007 Apr; 51(4):940-7; discussion 947-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  110. Temporary renal ischemia during nephron sparing surgery is associated with short-term but not long-term impairment in renal function. J Urol. 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 1):1339-43; discussion 1343.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  111. Safety and efficacy of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin instillations in steroid treated and immunocompromised patients. J Urol. 2006 Aug; 176(2):482-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  112. Use of 2.6 ng/ml prostate specific antigen prompt for biopsy in men older than 60 years. J Urol. 2005 Dec; 174(6):2154-7, discussion 2157.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  113. Preoperative PSA and progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy for Stage T1c disease. Urology. 2005 Jul; 66(1):156-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  114. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol. 2004 Dec; 172(6 Pt 1):2227-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  115. Plasma cell infiltration of the urinary bladder. Urology. 2004 Jul; 64(1):156-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.