The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Scott Eggener to Prostatectomy

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Scott Eggener has written about Prostatectomy.
Scott Eggener
Connection Strength
10.666
Prostatectomy
  1. Radical Prostatectomy Without Biopsy: Audacious, Imprudent, or Innovative? Eur Urol. 2022 08; 82(2):161-162.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.575
  2. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes for Rectal Injury During Radical Prostatectomy: A Population-based Study. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 12; 1(6):501-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.444
  3. Novel focal therapy treatment options for prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2018 03; 28(2):178-183.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.434
  4. Nodal Metastases at Radical Prostatectomy: More Aggressive Disease Warrants Consideration of Multimodal Treatment. Eur Urol. 2018 06; 73(6):897-898.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.427
  5. Minimal difference in survival between radical prostatectomy and observation in men with modest life expectancy. Evid Based Med. 2017 12; 22(6):222.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.425
  6. Managing Cancer Relapse After Radical Prostatectomy: Adjuvant Versus Salvage Radiation Therapy. Urol Clin North Am. 2017 Nov; 44(4):597-609.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.424
  7. In localised prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy was associated with more sexual dysfunction and urinary incontinence than radiation or active surveillance. Evid Based Med. 2017 10; 22(5):192.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.418
  8. Influence of pathologist experience on positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2017 07; 35(7):461.e1-461.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.406
  9. Comparison of Perioperative and Early Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in a Contemporary Population Based Cohort. J Urol. 2016 07; 196(1):76-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.376
  10. Population-based analysis of salvage radical prostatectomy with examination of factors associated with adverse perioperative outcomes. Urol Oncol. 2015 Apr; 33(4):163.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.352
  11. Population based analysis of incidence and predictors of open conversion during minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2015 Mar; 193(3):826-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.350
  12. Commentary on: "Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer." Resnick MJ, Koyama T, Fan KH, Albertsen PC, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, Hoffman RM, Potosky AL, Stanford JL, Stroup AM, Van Horn RL, Penson DF. Department of Urologic Surgery and the Center for Surgical Quality and Outcomes Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.: N Engl J Med 2013;368(5):436-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209978. Urol Oncol. 2014 May; 32(4):513-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.333
  13. The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2014 May; 65(5):918-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.312
  14. Hazard of prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2012 Jan; 187(1):124-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.281
  15. Cause-specific mortality following radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012 Mar; 15(1):106-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.281
  16. Focal therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Arch Esp Urol. 2011 Oct; 64(8):815-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.278
  17. Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2011 Mar; 185(3):869-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.265
  18. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence. J Urol. 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.236
  19. Editorial comment on: Preservation of lateral prostatic fascia is associated with urine continence after robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2009 Apr; 55(4):900-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  20. Comparison of models to predict clinical failure after radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 2009 Jan 15; 115(2):303-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  21. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: ten years later, time for evidence-based foundation. Eur Urol. 2008 Jul; 54(1):4-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.217
  22. Radical prostatectomy shortly after prostate biopsy does not affect operative difficulty or efficacy. Urology. 2007 Jun; 69(6):1128-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.206
  23. Contemporary survival results and the role of radiation therapy in patients with node negative seminal vesicle invasion following radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005 Apr; 173(4):1150-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  24. Prostate cancer and solid organ transplantation: patient management and outcomes. BJU Int. 2025 Feb; 135(2):339-345.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  25. Blood Prostate-specific Antigen by Volume of Benign, Gleason Pattern 3 and 4 Prostate Tissue. Urology. 2022 12; 170:154-160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  26. Prostate Cancer, Decisional Regret and Exercise. J Urol. 2022 05; 207(5):952-953.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  27. Molecular Biomarkers in Localized Prostate Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020 05 01; 38(13):1474-1494.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  28. SPARED Collaboration: Patient Selection for Partial Gland Ablation in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2019 11; 202(5):952-958.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  29. Patient-reported Outcomes and Late Toxicity After Postprostatectomy Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy. Eur Urol. 2019 11; 76(5):686-692.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  30. Focal laser ablation as clinical treatment of prostate cancer: report from a Delphi consensus project. World J Urol. 2019 Oct; 37(10):2147-2153.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  31. Nerve Bundle Hydrodissection and Sexual Function after Robot Prostatectomy. JSLS. 2017 Oct-Dec; 21(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  32. Contemporary management of men with high-risk localized prostate cancer in the United States. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 09; 20(3):283-288.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  33. Low-risk Prostate Cancer: Identification, Management, and Outcomes. Eur Urol. 2017 08; 72(2):238-249.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  34. Extraprostatic Extension Is Extremely Rare for Contemporary Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2017 09; 72(3):455-460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  35. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 10; 40(10):1400-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  36. Risk of lymph node metastases in pathological gleason score=6 prostate adenocarcinoma: Analysis of institutional and population-based databases. Urol Oncol. 2017 01; 35(1):31.e1-31.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  37. Editorial Comment. J Urol. 2016 12; 196(6):1668-1669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  38. Contemporary Population-Based Comparison of Localized Ductal Adenocarcinoma and High-Risk Acinar Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate. Urology. 2015 Oct; 86(4):777-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  39. The impact of days off between cases on perioperative outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2016 Feb; 34(2):269-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  40. Corneal abrasion in hysterectomy and prostatectomy: role of laparoscopic and robotic assistance. Anesthesiology. 2015 May; 122(5):994-1001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  41. Pathologic outcomes for low-risk prostate cancer after delayed radical prostatectomy in the United States. Urol Oncol. 2015 Apr; 33(4):164.e11-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  42. Do margins matter? The influence of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer-specific mortality. Eur Urol. 2014 Apr; 65(4):675-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  43. Short (= 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  44. Focal therapy for prostate cancer: possibilities and limitations. Eur Urol. 2010 Jul; 58(1):57-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  45. Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology. 2009 Feb; 73(2):316-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  46. Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a critical appraisal of rationale and modalities. J Urol. 2007 Dec; 178(6):2260-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  47. Secondary therapy, metastatic progression, and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008 May; 53(5):950-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  48. Association of cysteine-rich secretory protein 3 and beta-microseminoprotein with outcome after radical prostatectomy. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jul 15; 13(14):4130-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  49. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized, high risk prostate cancer: critical analysis of risk assessment methods. J Urol. 2007 Aug; 178(2):493-9; discussion 499.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  50. The natural history of noncastrate metastatic prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007 Apr; 51(4):940-7; discussion 947-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  51. Preoperative PSA and progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy for Stage T1c disease. Urology. 2005 Jul; 66(1):156-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  52. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol. 2004 Dec; 172(6 Pt 1):2227-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  53. Hematuria following Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy: Incidence Increases with Long-Term Followup. J Urol. 2022 06; 207(6):1236-1245.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  54. Validation of Prostate Tissue Composition by Using Hybrid Multidimensional MRI: Correlation with Histologic Findings. Radiology. 2022 02; 302(2):368-377.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  55. Impact of preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of high-risk prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 03; 23(1):172-178.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  56. Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by Use of MRI-Derived Quantitative Risk Maps: A Feasibility Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 08; 213(2):W66-W75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  57. Variability in Outcomes for Patients with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer (Gleason Score 7, International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Group 2-3) and Implications for Risk Stratification: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus. 2017 10; 3(4-5):487-497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  58. Robotic-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: frequency of nodal metastases and oncological outcomes. World J Urol. 2015 Nov; 33(11):1689-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  59. Prostate volumes derived from MRI and volume-adjusted serum prostate-specific antigen: correlation with Gleason score of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Nov; 201(5):1041-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  60. Development and multi-institutional validation of an upgrading risk tool for Gleason 6 prostate cancer. Cancer. 2013 Nov 15; 119(22):3992-4002.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  61. Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: evaluation by using multiparametric endorectal MR imaging. Radiology. 2013 Jun; 267(3):797-806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  62. Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study. Radiology. 2013 Jun; 267(3):787-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  63. Evaluation of the prostate bed for local recurrence after radical prostatectomy using endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Feb 01; 85(2):378-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  64. Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec; 197(6):1382-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  65. High-resolution MRI of excised human prostate specimens acquired with 9.4T in detection and identification of cancers: validation of a technique. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct; 34(4):956-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  66. A single microfocus (5% or less) of Gleason 6 prostate cancer at biopsy--can we predict adverse pathological outcomes? J Urol. 2008 Dec; 180(6):2436-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  67. Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance. J Urol. 2008 Nov; 180(5):1964-7; discussion 1967-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  68. The role of SPINK1 in ETS rearrangement-negative prostate cancers. Cancer Cell. 2008 Jun; 13(6):519-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  69. Survival results in patients with screen-detected prostate cancer versus physician-referred patients treated with radical prostatectomy: early results. Urol Oncol. 2006 Nov-Dec; 24(6):465-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.