The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Scott Eggener to Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Scott Eggener has written about Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Scott Eggener
Connection Strength
2.114
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  1. AUA Policy Statement on the Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2017 10; 198(4):832-838.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.225
  2. New kids on the block: MRI guided transrectal focused US, TULSA, focal laser ablation, histotripsy - a comprehensive review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2026 Mar; 29(1):12-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  3. Prospective Validation of an Automated Hybrid Multidimensional MRI Tool for Prostate Cancer Detection Using Targeted Biopsy: Comparison with PI-RADS-based Assessment. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 Jan; 7(1):e240156.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  4. Improving reader accuracy and specificity with the addition of hybrid multidimensional-MRI to multiparametric-MRI in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancers. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 10; 48(10):3216-3228.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  5. Validation of Prostate Tissue Composition by Using Hybrid Multidimensional MRI: Correlation with Histologic Findings. Radiology. 2022 02; 302(2):368-377.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  6. How Should Molecular Markers and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Be Used in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer? Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 04; 5(2):135-137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  7. Impact of preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of high-risk prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 03; 23(1):172-178.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  8. Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by Use of MRI-Derived Quantitative Risk Maps: A Feasibility Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 08; 213(2):W66-W75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  9. Comparison of T2-Weighted Imaging, DWI, and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Calculation of Prostate Cancer Index Lesion Volume: Correlation With Whole-Mount Pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 02; 212(2):351-356.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  10. Evaluation of tumor coverage after MR-guided prostate focal laser ablation therapy. Med Phys. 2019 Feb; 46(2):800-810.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  11. Evaluation of Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer Using High Spectral and Spatial Resolution Imaging: A Pilot Study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 05; 49(5):1374-1380.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  12. Feasibility of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Low-Dose Gadolinium: Comparative Performance With Standard Dose in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. Invest Radiol. 2018 10; 53(10):609-615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  13. Clinical and Radiographic Predictors of Great Vessel Resection or Reconstruction During Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer. Urology. 2019 01; 123:186-190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  14. MRI Findings After MRI-Guided Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 09; 211(3):595-604.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  15. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10; 378(19):1767-1777.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  16. Low-risk Prostate Cancer: Identification, Management, and Outcomes. Eur Urol. 2017 08; 72(2):238-249.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  17. Commentary regarding a recent collaborative consensus statement addressing prostate MRI and MRI-targeted biopsy in patients with a prior negative prostate biopsy. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Feb; 42(2):346-349.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  18. Phase II Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2016 12; 196(6):1670-1675.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  19. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR. J Urol. 2016 12; 196(6):1613-1618.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  20. Active surveillance monitoring: the role of novel biomarkers and imaging. Asian J Androl. 2015 Nov-Dec; 17(6):882-4; discussion 883.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  21. Giant Multilocular Cystadenoma of the Prostate. Radiographics. 2015 Jul-Aug; 35(4):1051-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  22. Focal therapy: patients, interventions, and outcomes--a report from a consensus meeting. Eur Urol. 2015 Apr; 67(4):771-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  23. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging features of the normal central zone of the prostate. Acad Radiol. 2014 May; 21(5):569-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  24. Validation of quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images for prostate cancer detection and aggressiveness assessment: a cross-imager study. Radiology. 2014 May; 271(2):461-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  25. Prostate volumes derived from MRI and volume-adjusted serum prostate-specific antigen: correlation with Gleason score of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Nov; 201(5):1041-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  26. Revisiting the central gland anatomy via MRI: does the central gland extend below the level of verumontanum? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jan; 39(1):167-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  27. Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: evaluation by using multiparametric endorectal MR imaging. Radiology. 2013 Jun; 267(3):797-806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  28. Evaluation of the prostate bed for local recurrence after radical prostatectomy using endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Feb 01; 85(2):378-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  29. Local staging of prostate cancer with MRI. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012 Jul-Aug; 18(4):365-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  30. Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec; 197(6):1382-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  31. High-resolution MRI of excised human prostate specimens acquired with 9.4T in detection and identification of cancers: validation of a technique. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct; 34(4):956-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  32. Focal treatment of prostate cancer with vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy. ScientificWorldJournal. 2008 Oct 03; 8:963-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  33. Projected outcomes of reduced-biopsy management of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: implications for relabeling. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Apr 01; 117(4):685-691.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  34. Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline Part II: Considerations for a Prostate Biopsy. J Urol. 2023 07; 210(1):54-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  35. Assessing the accuracy of multiparametric MRI to predict clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naïve men across racial/ethnic groups. BMC Urol. 2022 Jul 18; 22(1):107.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  36. T2*-weighted MRI as a non-contrast-enhanced method for assessment of focal laser ablation zone extent in prostate cancer thermotherapy. Eur Radiol. 2021 Jan; 31(1):325-332.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  37. SPARED Collaboration: Patient Selection for Partial Gland Ablation in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2019 11; 202(5):952-958.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  38. Focal therapy in prostate cancer: international multidisciplinary consensus on trial design. Eur Urol. 2014 Jun; 65(6):1078-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  39. Multi-institutional validation of the ability of preoperative hydronephrosis to predict advanced pathologic tumor stage in upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2013 Aug; 31(6):904-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  40. Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance. J Urol. 2008 Nov; 180(5):1964-7; discussion 1967-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.