The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Richard A. Larson to Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Richard A. Larson has written about Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase.
  1. Is there a best TKI for chronic phase CML? Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2015; 2015:250-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.495
  2. Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analysis of nilotinib in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 May; 68(5):723-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.402
  3. Imatinib pharmacokinetics and its correlation with response and safety in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a subanalysis of the IRIS study. Blood. 2008 Apr 15; 111(8):4022-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.307
  4. Molecular response in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: prediction modeling and pathway analysis. Haematologica. 2023 06 01; 108(6):1567-1578.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.222
  5. Long-term benefits and risks of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 5-year update of the randomized ENESTnd trial. Leukemia. 2016 05; 30(5):1044-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  6. Safety and efficacy of switching to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase with suboptimal response or failure on front-line imatinib or nilotinib 300 mg twice daily. Haematologica. 2014 Jul; 99(7):1204-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  7. Imatinib 800 mg daily induces deeper molecular responses than imatinib 400 mg daily: results of SWOG S0325, an intergroup randomized PHASE II trial in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2014 Jan; 164(2):223-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  8. Current practices in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013 Feb; 13(1):48-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  9. A randomized trial of dasatinib 100 mg versus imatinib 400 mg in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012 Nov 08; 120(19):3898-905.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  10. Nilotinib in imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 48-month follow-up results of a phase II study. Leukemia. 2013 Jan; 27(1):107-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  11. Nilotinib is effective in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib resistance or intolerance: 24-month follow-up results. Blood. 2011 Jan 27; 117(4):1141-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  12. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 17; 362(24):2251-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  13. Nilotinib is active in chronic and accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia following failure of imatinib and dasatinib therapy. Leukemia. 2010 Jul; 24(7):1299-301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  14. Efficacy of imatinib dose escalation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Cancer. 2009 Feb 01; 115(3):551-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  15. A phase II study of continuous infusion homoharringtonine and cytarabine in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: CALGB study 19804. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009 Apr; 63(5):859-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  16. Dasatinib induces durable cytogenetic responses in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase with resistance or intolerance to imatinib. Leukemia. 2008 Jun; 22(6):1200-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  17. Quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia on imatinib versus interferon alfa plus low-dose cytarabine: results from the IRIS Study. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 01; 21(11):2138-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  18. Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 13; 348(11):994-1004.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.