The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Mark J. Ratain to Informed Consent

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mark J. Ratain has written about Informed Consent.
Connection Strength

0.776
  1. An Expanded Role for IRBs in the Oversight of Research Biopsies. Ethics Hum Res. 2022 Sep; 44(5):32-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  2. Quantitative analysis of ethical issues in phase I trials: a survey interview of 144 advanced cancer patients. IRB. 2000 May-Jun; 22(3):6-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  3. Ethical Framework for Including Research Biopsies in Oncology Clinical Trials: American Society of Clinical Oncology Research Statement. J Clin Oncol. 2019 09 10; 37(26):2368-2377.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  4. Do Patients With Advanced Cancer Have the Ability to Make Informed Decisions for Participation in Phase I Clinical Trials? J Clin Oncol. 2018 08 20; 36(24):2483-2491.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  5. Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jul; 16(7):2305-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  6. Learning from our patients: one participant's impact on clinical trial research and informed consent. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jun 01; 126(11):892-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  7. Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J Clin Oncol. 1995 May; 13(5):1062-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  8. Pushing the envelope: informed consent in phase I trials. Ann Oncol. 1995 Apr; 6(4):321-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  9. Statistical and ethical issues in the design and conduct of phase I and II clinical trials of new anticancer agents. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Oct 20; 85(20):1637-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  10. Inside information: Financial conflicts of interest for research subjects in early phase clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 May 05; 96(9):656-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  11. Ethical issues in phase I oncology research: a comparison of investigators and institutional review board chairpersons. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Nov; 10(11):1810-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.