The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Mark J. Ratain to Surveys and Questionnaires

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mark J. Ratain has written about Surveys and Questionnaires.
Connection Strength

0.151
  1. Patient insights on features of an effective pharmacogenomics patient portal. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2020 12; 30(9):191-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  2. Assessment of Patient Knowledge and Perceptions of Pharmacogenomics Before and After Using a Mock Results Patient Web Portal. Clin Transl Sci. 2020 01; 13(1):78-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  3. Assessment of provider-perceived barriers to clinical use of pharmacogenomics during participation in an institutional implementation study. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2019 02; 29(2):31-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  4. Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: The validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). Cancer. 2017 02 01; 123(3):476-484.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  5. Physician-determined patient risk of toxic effects: impact on enrollment and decision making in phase I cancer trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Nov 16; 86(22):1685-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  6. The development of a financial toxicity patient-reported outcome in cancer: The COST measure. Cancer. 2014 Oct 15; 120(20):3245-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  7. Complementary and alternative medicine among advanced cancer patients enrolled on phase I trials: a study of prognosis, quality of life, and preferences for decision making. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10; 25(5):548-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  8. Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J Clin Oncol. 1995 May; 13(5):1062-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  9. Ethical issues in phase I oncology research: a comparison of investigators and institutional review board chairpersons. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Nov; 10(11):1810-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.