Gladell P. Paner to Neoplasm Grading
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Gladell P. Paner has written about Neoplasm Grading.
Connection Strength
2.623
-
Essential Updates in Grading, Morphotyping, Reporting, and Staging of Prostate Carcinoma for General Surgical Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 05; 143(5):550-564.
Score: 0.595
-
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Current Issues in Bladder Cancer. Working Group 2: Grading of Mixed Grade, Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma Including Histologic Subtypes and Divergent Differentiations, and Non-Urothelial Carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2024 Jan 01; 48(1):e11-e23.
Score: 0.200
-
Point-Counterpoint: Grade Group 1 (Gleason Score 6) Prostate Cancer Should Be Renamed to Improve Public Health: Pathologists' Perspective. J Urol. 2023 07; 210(1):23-25.
Score: 0.198
-
Updates in Grading of Renal Cell Carcinomas Beyond Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma. Adv Anat Pathol. 2022 May 01; 29(3):117-130.
Score: 0.185
-
The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 08; 44(8):e87-e99.
Score: 0.164
-
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is an aggressive form of invasive carcinoma and should be graded. Pathology. 2020 Feb; 52(2):192-196.
Score: 0.157
-
Contemporary Grading and Staging of Urothelial Neoplasms of the Urinary Bladder: New Concepts and Approaches to Challenging Scenarios. Surg Pathol Clin. 2018 Dec; 11(4):775-795.
Score: 0.146
-
Predominantly cystic clear cell renal cell carcinoma and multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential form a low-grade spectrum. Virchows Arch. 2018 Jul; 473(1):85-93.
Score: 0.141
-
Urachal carcinomas of the nonglandular type: salient features and considerations in pathologic diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Mar; 36(3):432-42.
Score: 0.091
-
The influence of the "cancer" label on perceptions and management decisions for low-grade prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 11 08; 115(11):1364-1373.
Score: 0.051
-
Physician Perception of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus. 2023 11; 9(6):966-973.
Score: 0.050
-
Blood Prostate-specific Antigen by Volume of Benign, Gleason Pattern 3 and 4 Prostate Tissue. Urology. 2022 12; 170:154-160.
Score: 0.047
-
Low-Grade Prostate Cancer: Time to Stop Calling It Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022 09 20; 40(27):3110-3114.
Score: 0.046
-
The Genitourinary Pathology Society Update on Classification and Grading of Flat and Papillary Urothelial Neoplasia With New Reporting Recommendations and Approach to Lesions With Mixed and Early Patterns of Neoplasia. Adv Anat Pathol. 2021 Jul 01; 28(4):179-195.
Score: 0.044
-
Should Grade Group 1 (GG1) be called cancer? World J Urol. 2022 Jan; 40(1):15-19.
Score: 0.042
-
Similarities and Differences in the 2019 ISUP and GUPS Recommendations on Prostate Cancer Grading: A Guide for Practicing Pathologists. Adv Anat Pathol. 2021 Jan; 28(1):1-7.
Score: 0.042
-
Reporting Practices and Resource Utilization in the Era of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Survey of Genitourinary Subspecialists. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 05; 44(5):673-680.
Score: 0.040
-
Reappraisal of Morphologic Differences Between Renal Medullary Carcinoma, Collecting Duct Carcinoma, and Fumarate Hydratase-deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 03; 42(3):279-292.
Score: 0.035
-
Genomic Heterogeneity Within Individual Prostate Cancer Foci Impacts Predictive Biomarkers of Targeted Therapy. Eur Urol Focus. 2019 05; 5(3):416-424.
Score: 0.035
-
The New Realization About Cribriform Prostate Cancer. Adv Anat Pathol. 2018 Jan; 25(1):31-37.
Score: 0.034
-
Extraprostatic Extension Is Extremely Rare for Contemporary Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2017 09; 72(3):455-460.
Score: 0.032
-
Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 10; 40(10):1400-6.
Score: 0.031
-
Risk of lymph node metastases in pathological gleason score=6 prostate adenocarcinoma: Analysis of institutional and population-based databases. Urol Oncol. 2017 01; 35(1):31.e1-31.e6.
Score: 0.031
-
Diagnosis of "Poorly Formed Glands" Gleason Pattern 4 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: An Interobserver Reproducibility Study Among Urologic Pathologists With Recommendations. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Oct; 39(10):1331-9.
Score: 0.029
-
Diagnosis of Gleason pattern 5 prostate adenocarcinoma on core needle biopsy: an interobserver reproducibility study among urologic pathologists. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Sep; 39(9):1242-9.
Score: 0.029
-
Contemporary Population-Based Comparison of Localized Ductal Adenocarcinoma and High-Risk Acinar Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate. Urology. 2015 Oct; 86(4):777-82.
Score: 0.029
-
Collecting duct carcinoma versus renal medullary carcinoma: an appeal for nosologic and biological clarity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Jul; 38(7):871-4.
Score: 0.027
-
Immunohistochemical profile to distinguish urothelial from squamous differentiation in carcinomas of urothelial tract. Hum Pathol. 2013 Feb; 44(2):164-72.
Score: 0.024
-
Predictors of Gleason Score (GS) upgrading on subsequent prostatectomy: a single Institution study in a cohort of patients with GS 6. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2012; 5(6):496-502.
Score: 0.024
-
Deregulation of a Hox protein regulatory network spanning prostate cancer initiation and progression. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Aug 15; 18(16):4291-302.
Score: 0.023