The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Gladell P. Paner to Neoplasm Grading

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Gladell P. Paner has written about Neoplasm Grading.
Connection Strength

2.680
  1. Essential Updates in Grading, Morphotyping, Reporting, and Staging of Prostate Carcinoma for General Surgical Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 05; 143(5):550-564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.608
  2. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Current Issues in Bladder Cancer. Working Group 2: Grading of Mixed Grade, Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma Including Histologic Subtypes and Divergent Differentiations, and Non-Urothelial Carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2024 Jan 01; 48(1):e11-e23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  3. Point-Counterpoint: Grade Group 1 (Gleason Score 6) Prostate Cancer Should Be Renamed to Improve Public Health: Pathologists' Perspective. J Urol. 2023 07; 210(1):23-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  4. Updates in Grading of Renal Cell Carcinomas Beyond Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma. Adv Anat Pathol. 2022 May 01; 29(3):117-130.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  5. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 08; 44(8):e87-e99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  6. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is an aggressive form of invasive carcinoma and should be graded. Pathology. 2020 Feb; 52(2):192-196.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  7. Contemporary Grading and Staging of Urothelial Neoplasms of the Urinary Bladder: New Concepts and Approaches to Challenging Scenarios. Surg Pathol Clin. 2018 Dec; 11(4):775-795.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  8. Predominantly cystic clear cell renal cell carcinoma and multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential form a low-grade spectrum. Virchows Arch. 2018 Jul; 473(1):85-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  9. Urachal carcinomas of the nonglandular type: salient features and considerations in pathologic diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Mar; 36(3):432-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  10. The influence of the "cancer" label on perceptions and management decisions for low-grade prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 11 08; 115(11):1364-1373.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  11. Physician Perception of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus. 2023 11; 9(6):966-973.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  12. Blood Prostate-specific Antigen by Volume of Benign, Gleason Pattern 3 and 4 Prostate Tissue. Urology. 2022 12; 170:154-160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  13. Low-Grade Prostate Cancer: Time to Stop Calling It Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022 09 20; 40(27):3110-3114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  14. The Genitourinary Pathology Society Update on Classification and Grading of Flat and Papillary Urothelial Neoplasia With New Reporting Recommendations and Approach to Lesions With Mixed and Early Patterns of Neoplasia. Adv Anat Pathol. 2021 Jul 01; 28(4):179-195.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  15. Should Grade Group 1 (GG1) be called cancer? World J Urol. 2022 Jan; 40(1):15-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  16. Similarities and Differences in the 2019 ISUP and GUPS Recommendations on Prostate Cancer Grading: A Guide for Practicing Pathologists. Adv Anat Pathol. 2021 Jan; 28(1):1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  17. Reporting Practices and Resource Utilization in the Era of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Survey of Genitourinary Subspecialists. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 05; 44(5):673-680.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  18. Reappraisal of Morphologic Differences Between Renal Medullary Carcinoma, Collecting Duct Carcinoma, and Fumarate Hydratase-deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 03; 42(3):279-292.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  19. Genomic Heterogeneity Within Individual Prostate Cancer Foci Impacts Predictive Biomarkers of Targeted Therapy. Eur Urol Focus. 2019 05; 5(3):416-424.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  20. The New Realization About Cribriform Prostate Cancer. Adv Anat Pathol. 2018 Jan; 25(1):31-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  21. Extraprostatic Extension Is Extremely Rare for Contemporary Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2017 09; 72(3):455-460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  22. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 10; 40(10):1400-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  23. Risk of lymph node metastases in pathological gleason score=6 prostate adenocarcinoma: Analysis of institutional and population-based databases. Urol Oncol. 2017 01; 35(1):31.e1-31.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  24. Diagnosis of "Poorly Formed Glands" Gleason Pattern 4 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: An Interobserver Reproducibility Study Among Urologic Pathologists With Recommendations. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Oct; 39(10):1331-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  25. Diagnosis of Gleason pattern 5 prostate adenocarcinoma on core needle biopsy: an interobserver reproducibility study among urologic pathologists. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Sep; 39(9):1242-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  26. Contemporary Population-Based Comparison of Localized Ductal Adenocarcinoma and High-Risk Acinar Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate. Urology. 2015 Oct; 86(4):777-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  27. Collecting duct carcinoma versus renal medullary carcinoma: an appeal for nosologic and biological clarity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Jul; 38(7):871-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  28. Immunohistochemical profile to distinguish urothelial from squamous differentiation in carcinomas of urothelial tract. Hum Pathol. 2013 Feb; 44(2):164-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  29. Predictors of Gleason Score (GS) upgrading on subsequent prostatectomy: a single Institution study in a cohort of patients with GS 6. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2012; 5(6):496-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  30. Deregulation of a Hox protein regulatory network spanning prostate cancer initiation and progression. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Aug 15; 18(16):4291-302.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.