Loading...
The University of Chicago Header Logo
Keywords
Last Name
Institution

Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Milica Medved and Hiroyuki Abe.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
1.001
 
  1. Penn AI, Medved M, Dialani V, Pisano ED, Cole EB, Brousseau D, Karczmar GS, Gao G, Reich BD, Abe H. Discrimination of benign from malignant breast lesions in dense breasts with model-based analysis of regions-of-interest using directional diffusion-weighted images. BMC Med Imaging. 2020 06 09; 20(1):61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  2. Medved M, Li H, Abe H, Sheth D, Newstead GM, Olopade OI, Giger ML, Karczmar GS. Fast bilateral breast coverage with high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) MRI at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 11; 46(5):1341-1348.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  3. Medved M, Fan X, Abe H, Newstead GM, Wood AM, Shimauchi A, Kulkarni K, Ivancevic MK, Pesce LL, Olopade OI, Karczmar GS. Non-contrast enhanced MRI for evaluation of breast lesions: comparison of non-contrast enhanced high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) images versus contrast enhanced fat-suppressed images. Acad Radiol. 2011 Dec; 18(12):1467-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  4. Medved M, Newstead GM, Abe H, Olopade OI, Shimauchi A, Zamora MA, Karczmar GS. Clinical implementation of a multislice high spectral and spatial resolution-based MRI sequence to achieve unilateral full-breast coverage. Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jan; 28(1):16-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  5. Medved M, Newstead GM, Abe H, Zamora MA, Olopade OI, Karczmar GS. High spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: preliminary clinical experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jan; 186(1):30-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  6. Ren Z, Pineda FD, Howard FM, Hill E, Szasz T, Safi R, Medved M, Nanda R, Yankeelov TE, Abe H, Karczmar GS. Differences Between Ipsilateral and Contralateral Early Parenchymal Enhancement Kinetics Predict Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Therapy. Acad Radiol. 2022 Mar 26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  7. Pineda F, Sheth D, Abe H, Medved M, Karczmar GS. Low-dose imaging technique (LITE) MRI: initial experience in breast imaging. Br J Radiol. 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20190302.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  8. Li H, Weiss WA, Medved M, Abe H, Newstead GM, Karczmar GS, Giger ML. Breast density estimation from high spectral and spatial resolution MRI. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016 Oct; 3(4):044507.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  9. Pineda FD, Medved M, Wang S, Fan X, Schacht DV, Sennett C, Oto A, Newstead GM, Abe H, Karczmar GS. Ultrafast Bilateral DCE-MRI of the Breast with Conventional Fourier Sampling: Preliminary Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Analysis. Acad Radiol. 2016 09; 23(9):1137-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  10. Pineda FD, Medved M, Fan X, Ivancevic MK, Abe H, Shimauchi A, Newstead GM, Karczmar GS. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0?T: a pilot study. Br J Radiol. 2015 May; 88(1049):20150021.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  11. Jansen SA, Fan X, Medved M, Abe H, Shimauchi A, Yang C, Zamora M, Foxley S, Olopade OI, Karczmar GS, Newstead GM. Characterizing early contrast uptake of ductal carcinoma in situ with high temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: a pilot study. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Oct 07; 55(19):N473-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  12. Fan X, Abe H, Medved M, Foxley S, Arkani S, Zamora MA, Olopade OI, Newstead GM, Karczmar GS. Fat suppression with spectrally selective inversion vs. high spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: qualitative and quantitative comparisons. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Dec; 24(6):1311-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  13. Fan X, Medved M, Karczmar GS, Yang C, Foxley S, Arkani S, Recant W, Zamora MA, Abe H, Newstead GM. Diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions using an empirical mathematical model for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jun; 25(5):593-603.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.