Connection
Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Milica Medved and Xiaobing Fan.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
|
1.391 |
|
|
|
-
Fan X, Chatterjee A, Medved M, Oto A, Karczmar GS. Signal intensity form of the Tofts model for quantitative analysis of prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data. Phys Med Biol. 2021 01 22; 66(2):025002.
Score: 0.228
-
Medved M, Fan X, Abe H, Newstead GM, Wood AM, Shimauchi A, Kulkarni K, Ivancevic MK, Pesce LL, Olopade OI, Karczmar GS. Non-contrast enhanced MRI for evaluation of breast lesions: comparison of non-contrast enhanced high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) images versus contrast enhanced fat-suppressed images. Acad Radiol. 2011 Dec; 18(12):1467-74.
Score: 0.120
-
Medved M, Newstead GM, Fan X, Du YP, Olopade OI, Shimauchi A, Zamora MA, Karczmar GS. Fourier component imaging of water resonance in the human breast provides markers for malignancy. Phys Med Biol. 2009 Oct 07; 54(19):5767-79.
Score: 0.104
-
Fan X, Abe H, Medved M, Foxley S, Arkani S, Zamora MA, Olopade OI, Newstead GM, Karczmar GS. Fat suppression with spectrally selective inversion vs. high spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: qualitative and quantitative comparisons. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Dec; 24(6):1311-5.
Score: 0.085
-
Fan X, Medved M, Karczmar GS, Yang C, Foxley S, Arkani S, Recant W, Zamora MA, Abe H, Newstead GM. Diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions using an empirical mathematical model for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jun; 25(5):593-603.
Score: 0.085
-
Fan X, Medved M, Foxley S, River JN, Zamora M, Karczmar GS, Corot C, Robert P, Bourrinet P. Multi-slice DCE-MRI data using P760 distinguishes between metastatic and non-metastatic rodent prostate tumors. MAGMA. 2006 Feb; 19(1):15-21.
Score: 0.080
-
Medved M, Newstead GM, Fan X, Du W, Du YP, MacEneaney PM, Culp RM, Kelcz F, Olopade OI, Zamora MA, Karczmar GS. Fourier components of inhomogeneously broadened water resonances in breast: a new source of MRI contrast. Magn Reson Med. 2004 Jul; 52(1):193-6.
Score: 0.072
-
Fan X, Medved M, River JN, Zamora M, Corot C, Robert P, Bourrinet P, Lipton M, Culp RM, Karczmar GS. New model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data distinguishes metastatic from nonmetastatic transplanted rodent prostate tumors. Magn Reson Med. 2004 Mar; 51(3):487-94.
Score: 0.071
-
Medved M, Du W, Zamora MA, Fan X, Olopade OI, MacEneaney PM, Newstead G, Karczmar GS. The effect of varying spectral resolution on the quality of high spectral and spatial resolution magnetic resonance images of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Oct; 18(4):442-8.
Score: 0.069
-
Szasz T, Lee G, Chatterjee A, Medved M, Devaraj A, Yousuf A, Fan X, Karczmar GS, Oto A. Physically implausible signals as a quantitative quality assessment metric in prostate diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 May 18.
Score: 0.062
-
He D, Fan X, Chatterjee A, Wang S, Medved M, Pineda FD, Yousuf A, Antic T, Oto A, Karczmar GS. A compact solution for estimation of physiological parameters from ultrafast prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2019 08 07; 64(15):155012.
Score: 0.051
-
Wang S, Fan X, Zhang Y, Medved M, He D, Yousuf A, Jamison E, Oto A, Karczmar GS. Use of Indicator Dilution Principle to Evaluate Accuracy of Arterial Input Function Measured With Low-Dose Ultrafast Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI. Tomography. 2019 06; 5(2):260-265.
Score: 0.051
-
Wang S, Lu Z, Fan X, Medved M, Jiang X, Sammet S, Yousuf A, Pineda F, Oto A, Karczmar GS. Comparison of arterial input functions measured from ultra-fast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography in prostate cancer patients. Phys Med Biol. 2018 01 30; 63(3):03NT01.
Score: 0.046
-
Pineda FD, Medved M, Wang S, Fan X, Schacht DV, Sennett C, Oto A, Newstead GM, Abe H, Karczmar GS. Ultrafast Bilateral DCE-MRI of the Breast with Conventional Fourier Sampling: Preliminary Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Analysis. Acad Radiol. 2016 09; 23(9):1137-44.
Score: 0.041
-
Wang S, Fan X, Medved M, Pineda FD, Yousuf A, Oto A, Karczmar GS. Arterial input functions (AIFs) measured directly from arteries with low and standard doses of contrast agent, and AIFs derived from reference tissues. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb; 34(2):197-203.
Score: 0.040
-
Pineda FD, Medved M, Fan X, Karczmar GS. B1 and T1 mapping of the breast with a reference tissue method. Magn Reson Med. 2016 Apr; 75(4):1565-73.
Score: 0.038
-
Pineda FD, Medved M, Fan X, Ivancevic MK, Abe H, Shimauchi A, Newstead GM, Karczmar GS. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0?T: a pilot study. Br J Radiol. 2015 May; 88(1049):20150021.
Score: 0.038
-
Jansen SA, Fan X, Medved M, Abe H, Shimauchi A, Yang C, Zamora M, Foxley S, Olopade OI, Karczmar GS, Newstead GM. Characterizing early contrast uptake of ductal carcinoma in situ with high temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: a pilot study. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Oct 07; 55(19):N473-85.
Score: 0.028
-
Foxley S, Fan X, Mustafi D, Haney C, Zamora M, Markiewicz E, Medved M, Wood AM, Karczmar GS. Sensitivity to tumor microvasculature without contrast agents in high spectral and spatial resolution MR images. Magn Reson Med. 2009 Feb; 61(2):291-8.
Score: 0.025
-
Foxley S, Fan X, Mustafi D, Yang C, Zamora MA, Medved M, Karczmar GS. Quantitative analysis of water proton spectral lineshape: a novel source of contrast in MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Sep 07; 53(17):4509-22.
Score: 0.024
-
Du W, Du YP, Bick U, Fan X, MacEneaney PM, Zamora MA, Medved M, Karczmar GS. Breast MR imaging with high spectral and spatial resolutions: preliminary experience. Radiology. 2002 Aug; 224(2):577-85.
Score: 0.016
-
Karczmar GS, Du W, Medved M, Bick U, MacEneany P, Du YP, Fan X, Zamora M, Lipton M. Spectrally inhomogeneous effects of contrast agents in breast lesion detected by high spectral and spatial resolution MRI. Acad Radiol. 2002 Aug; 9 Suppl 2:S352-4.
Score: 0.016
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|