Loading...
The University of Chicago Header Logo
Keywords
Last Name
Institution
 Back to Details

Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Xiaobing Fan and Aytekin Oto.

 
Connection Strength
  
 
 
3.525
  
  1. Fan X, Haney CR, Agrawal G, Pelizzari CA, Antic T, Eggener SE, Sethi I, River JN, Zamora M, Karczmar GS, Oto A. High-resolution MRI of excised human prostate specimens acquired with 9.4T in detection and identification of cancers: validation of a technique. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct; 34(4):956-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.521
  2. Oto A, Schmid-Tannwald C, Agrawal G, Kayhan A, Lakadamyali H, Orrin S, Sethi I, Sammet S, Fan X. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of abdominopelvic abscesses. Emerg Radiol. 2011 Dec; 18(6):515-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.516
  3. Fan X, Chatterjee A, Medved M, Oto A, Karczmar GS. Signal intensity form of the Tofts model for quantitative analysis of prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data. Phys Med Biol. 2021 Jan 22; 66(2):025002.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  4. Chatterjee A, Gallan AJ, He D, Fan X, Mustafi D, Yousuf A, Antic T, Karczmar GS, Oto A. Revisiting quantitative multi-parametric MRI of benign prostatic hyperplasia and its differentiation from transition zone cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 06; 44(6):2233-2243.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.222
  5. Chatterjee A, He D, Fan X, Antic T, Jiang Y, Eggener S, Karczmar GS, Oto A. Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by Use of MRI-Derived Quantitative Risk Maps: A Feasibility Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 08; 213(2):W66-W75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  6. Wang S, Fan X, Yousuf A, Eggener SE, Karczmar G, Oto A. Evaluation of Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer Using High Spectral and Spatial Resolution Imaging: A Pilot Study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 05; 49(5):1374-1380.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  7. Westin C, Chatterjee A, Ku E, Yousuf A, Wang S, Thomas S, Fan X, Eggener S, Karczmar G, Oto A. MRI Findings After MRI-Guided Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 09; 211(3):595-604.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  8. Chatterjee A, He D, Fan X, Wang S, Szasz T, Yousuf A, Pineda F, Antic T, Mathew M, Karczmar GS, Oto A. Performance of Ultrafast DCE-MRI for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2018 03; 25(3):349-358.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  9. He D, Zamora M, Oto A, Karczmar GS, Fan X. Comparison of region-of-interest-averaged and pixel-averaged analysis of DCE-MRI data based on simulations and pre-clinical experiments. Phys Med Biol. 2017 Sep 05; 62(18):N445-N459.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  10. McCann SM, Jiang Y, Fan X, Wang J, Antic T, Prior F, VanderWeele D, Oto A. Quantitative Multiparametric MRI Features and PTEN Expression of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Mar; 206(3):559-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  11. Oto A, Kayhan A, Williams JT, Fan X, Yun L, Arkani S, Rubin DT. Active Crohn's disease in the small bowel: evaluation by diffusion weighted imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Mar; 33(3):615-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  12. Kayhan A, Fan X, Oommen J, Oto A. Multi-parametric MR imaging of transition zone prostate cancer: Imaging features, detection and staging. World J Radiol. 2010 May 28; 2(5):180-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  13. Oto A, Fan X, Mustafi D, Jansen SA, Karczmar GS, Rubin DT, Kayhan A. Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for assessment of bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease pilot study. Acad Radiol. 2009 Oct; 16(10):1223-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  14. Kayhan A, Fan X, Oto A. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Apr; 20(2):105-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  15. Zhou X, Fan X, Mustafi D, Pineda F, Markiewicz E, Zamora M, Sheth D, Olopade OI, Oto A, Karczmar GS. Comparison of DCE-MRI of murine model cancers with a low dose and high dose of contrast agent. Phys Med. 2020 Dec 26; 81:31-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  16. He D, Fan X, Chatterjee A, Wang S, Medved M, Pineda FD, Yousuf A, Antic T, Oto A, Karczmar GS. A compact solution for estimation of physiological parameters from ultrafast prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2019 08 07; 64(15):155012.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  17. Wang S, Fan X, Zhang Y, Medved M, He D, Yousuf A, Jamison E, Oto A, Karczmar GS. Use of Indicator Dilution Principle to Evaluate Accuracy of Arterial Input Function Measured With Low-Dose Ultrafast Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI. Tomography. 2019 06; 5(2):260-265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  18. Wang S, Lu Z, Fan X, Medved M, Jiang X, Sammet S, Yousuf A, Pineda F, Oto A, Karczmar GS. Comparison of arterial input functions measured from ultra-fast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography in prostate cancer patients. Phys Med Biol. 2018 01 30; 63(3):03NT01.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  19. Pineda FD, Medved M, Wang S, Fan X, Schacht DV, Sennett C, Oto A, Newstead GM, Abe H, Karczmar GS. Ultrafast Bilateral DCE-MRI of the Breast with Conventional Fourier Sampling: Preliminary Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Analysis. Acad Radiol. 2016 09; 23(9):1137-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  20. Wang S, Fan X, Medved M, Pineda FD, Yousuf A, Oto A, Karczmar GS. Arterial input functions (AIFs) measured directly from arteries with low and standard doses of contrast agent, and AIFs derived from reference tissues. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb; 34(2):197-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  21. Mustafi D, Fan X, Dougherty U, Bissonnette M, Karczmar GS, Oto A, Hart J, Markiewicz E, Zamora M. High-resolution magnetic resonance colonography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a murine model of colitis. Magn Reson Med. 2010 Apr; 63(4):922-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.