The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Peter Sand to Prostheses and Implants

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Peter Sand has written about Prostheses and Implants.
Connection Strength

0.985
  1. Detrusor overactivity and urge urinary incontinence [corrected] following midurethral versus bladder sling procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Dec; 193(6):2144-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.247
  2. Foley versus intermittent self-catheterization after transvaginal sling surgery: which works best? Urology. 2004 Jul; 64(1):53-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  3. The safety of reusing injectable collagen: a multicenter microbiological study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002; 13(4):232-4; discussion 235.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  4. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jan; 22(1):3-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  5. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Jan; 30(1):2-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  6. TVT versus SPARC: comparison of outcomes for two midurethral tape procedures. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Feb; 17(2):125-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  7. Chronic pelvic actinomycosis following a bone anchored sling procedure. J Urol. 2004 Jun; 171(6 Pt 1):2381.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  8. Effectiveness of a urinary control insert in the management of stress urinary incontinence: early results of a multicenter study. Urology. 1996 May; 47(5):629-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.