Lainie Ross to United States
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lainie Ross has written about United States.
Connection Strength
2.994
-
Parents Don't Know Best in the United Kingdom. Am J Bioeth. 2024 Jan; 24(1):103-106.
Score: 0.083
-
Representation of Women in Published Articles at 3 Academic Pediatric Journals: 2001 to 2022. Pediatrics. 2023 10 01; 152(4).
Score: 0.081
-
How Race, Ethnicity, and Social Determinants of Health Are Reported in Three European Pediatric Journals. J Pediatr. 2023 08; 259:113454.
Score: 0.079
-
Gender and race/ethnicity differences in living kidney donor demographics: Preference or disparity? Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2021 07; 35(3):100614.
Score: 0.069
-
Reflections on Ethics and Advocacy in Child Health (REACH): Creating a Forum for Ethical Dialogue. J Pediatr. 2021 04; 231:5-6.
Score: 0.067
-
Why Most Bad Decisions About Vaccines Do Not Constitute Child Neglect. Pediatr Neurol. 2020 12; 113:85-87.
Score: 0.066
-
Reopening K-12 Schools in the Era of Coronavirus Disease 2019: Review of State-Level Guidance Addressing Equity Concerns. J Pediatr. 2020 12; 227:38-44.e7.
Score: 0.066
-
Ethical Issues Raised by the Media Portrayal of Adolescent Transplant Refusals. Pediatrics. 2020 08; 146(Suppl 1):S33-S41.
Score: 0.065
-
Reflections on Charlie Gard and the Best Interests Standard From Both Sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Pediatrics. 2020 08; 146(Suppl 1):S60-S65.
Score: 0.065
-
Living Donation by Individuals with Life-Limiting Conditions. J Law Med Ethics. 2019 03; 47(1):112-122.
Score: 0.059
-
African-Americans with End Stage Renal Disease in the Early Years of Kidney Transplantation. J Natl Med Assoc. 2019 Aug; 111(4):352-362.
Score: 0.059
-
Prisoners as Living Donors: A Vulnerabilities Analysis. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2018 Jan; 27(1):93-108.
Score: 0.055
-
50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics: Editorial Comment: Therapeutic Orphans. J Pediatr. 2018 01; 192:59.
Score: 0.055
-
Gender Differences in the Authorship of Original Research in Pediatric Journals, 2001-2016. J Pediatr. 2017 12; 191:244-249.e1.
Score: 0.054
-
A Historical and Current Review of Newborn Screening for Neuromuscular Disorders From Around the World: Lessons for the United States. Pediatr Neurol. 2017 Dec; 77:12-22.
Score: 0.053
-
The Best Interest Standard: Same Name but Different Roles in Pediatric Bioethics and Child Rights Frameworks. Perspect Biol Med. 2017; 60(2):186-197.
Score: 0.051
-
Ethical and policy issues in newborn screening of children for neurologic and developmental disorders. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015 Jun; 62(3):787-98.
Score: 0.045
-
Pediatric Professionals' Attitudes about Secondary Findings in Genomic Sequencing of Children. J Pediatr. 2015 May; 166(5):1276-1282.e7.
Score: 0.045
-
Adding Another Voice to the Living Donor Kidney Transplant Discussions at the CIBA Symposium of 1966. Perspect Biol Med. 2015; 58(4):379-94.
Score: 0.044
-
When the living and the deceased cannot agree on organ donation: a survey of US organ procurement organizations (OPOs). Am J Transplant. 2014 Jan; 14(1):172-7.
Score: 0.041
-
Young physicians' recall about pediatric training in ethics and professionalism and its practical utility. J Pediatr. 2013 Oct; 163(4):1196-201.
Score: 0.040
-
Ethics and professionalism in medical physics: a survey of AAPM members. Med Phys. 2013 Apr; 40(4):047001.
Score: 0.039
-
Predictive genetic testing of children and the role of the best interest standard. J Law Med Ethics. 2013; 41(4):899-906, Table of Contents.
Score: 0.039
-
Identification and management of sickle cell trait by young physicians. J Natl Med Assoc. 2012 May-Jun; 104(5-6):299-304.
Score: 0.037
-
Sickle cell trait screening in athletes: pediatricians' attitudes and concerns. Pediatrics. 2011 Sep; 128(3):477-83.
Score: 0.035
-
Risk, prognosis, and unintended consequences in kidney allocation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 07; 364(14):1285-7.
Score: 0.034
-
Are we adequately protecting vulnerable patients in longitudinal observational studies? J Pediatr. 2011 Jun; 158(6):1036-7; author reply 1037.
Score: 0.034
-
Mandatory versus voluntary consent for newborn screening? Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2010 Dec; 20(4):299-328.
Score: 0.033
-
360 Degrees of human subjects protections in community-engaged research. Sci Transl Med. 2010 Aug 18; 2(45):45cm23.
Score: 0.033
-
Reactions of pediatricians to refusals of medical treatment for minors. J Adolesc Health. 2010 Aug; 47(2):126-32.
Score: 0.032
-
When physicians forego the doctor-patient relationship, should they elect to self-prescribe or curbside? An empirical and ethical analysis. J Med Ethics. 2010 Jan; 36(1):19-23.
Score: 0.031
-
Forty years later: the scope of bioethics revisited. Perspect Biol Med. 2010; 53(3):452-7.
Score: 0.031
-
Ethics and professionalism in the pediatric curriculum: a survey of pediatric program directors. Pediatrics. 2009 Oct; 124(4):1143-51.
Score: 0.031
-
Clinical and ethical considerations in managing carrier detection. Am J Public Health. 2009 Aug; 99(8):1348-9.
Score: 0.030
-
Pediatricians' attitudes toward resuscitation in children with chronic illnesses. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 May; 10(3):369-74.
Score: 0.030
-
Qualitative insights into how pediatric pay-for-performance programs are being designed. Acad Pediatr. 2009 May-Jun; 9(3):185-91.
Score: 0.030
-
Against the tide: arguments against respecting a minor's refusal of efficacious life-saving treatment. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2009; 18(3):302-15; discussion 315-22.
Score: 0.029
-
A descriptive and moral evaluation of providing informal medical care to one's own children. J Clin Ethics. 2009; 20(4):353-61.
Score: 0.029
-
Pediatricians' attitudes about screening newborns for infectious diseases. Matern Child Health J. 2010 Mar; 14(2):174-83.
Score: 0.029
-
Pediatricians are more supportive of the human papillomavirus vaccine than the general public. South Med J. 2008 Dec; 101(12):1216-21.
Score: 0.029
-
Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: a lesson in public health disparities. J Pediatr. 2008 Sep; 153(3):308-13.
Score: 0.029
-
Paediatricians' attitudes and practices towards HPV vaccination. Acta Paediatr. 2008 Nov; 97(11):1550-6.
Score: 0.028
-
An empirical investigation of physicians' attitudes toward intrasibling kidney donation by minor twins. Transplantation. 2008 May 15; 85(9):1235-9.
Score: 0.028
-
We need a registry of living kidney donors. Hastings Cent Rep. 2007 Nov-Dec; 37(6):1 p following 48.
Score: 0.027
-
The moral status of the newborn and its implications for medical decision making. Theor Med Bioeth. 2007; 28(5):349-55.
Score: 0.025
-
Attitudes and beliefs of pediatricians and genetic counselors regarding testing and screening for CF and G6PD: implications for policy. Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Nov 01; 140(21):2305-11.
Score: 0.025
-
Attitudes of genetic counselors towards expanding newborn screening and offering predictive genetic testing to children. Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Nov 01; 140(21):2312-9.
Score: 0.025
-
Phase I research and the meaning of direct benefit. J Pediatr. 2006 Jul; 149(1 Suppl):S20-4.
Score: 0.025
-
Newborn screening technology: proceed with caution. Pediatrics. 2006 May; 117(5):1793-9.
Score: 0.024
-
Pediatric research and the federal minimal risk standard. JAMA. 2006 Feb 15; 295(7):759; author reply 759-60.
Score: 0.024
-
Heterozygote carrier testing in high schools abroad: what are the lessons for the U.S.? J Law Med Ethics. 2006; 34(4):753-64.
Score: 0.024
-
Access and equity to cancer care in the USA: a review and assessment. Postgrad Med J. 2005 Nov; 81(961):674-9.
Score: 0.023
-
In defense of a single standard of research risk for all children. J Pediatr. 2005 Nov; 147(5):565-6.
Score: 0.023
-
The Newborn Screening Experience of Caregivers of Children With Cystic Fibrosis in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 May; 60(5):e71110.
Score: 0.023
-
Motivation, risk, and benefit in living organ donation: a reply to Aaron Spital. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2005; 14(2):191-4; discussion 195-8.
Score: 0.022
-
Lessons to be learned from the 407 process. Health Matrix Clevel. 2005; 15(2):401-21.
Score: 0.022
-
Restricting living-donor-cadaver-donor exchanges to ensure that standard blood type O wait-list candidates benefit. Transplantation. 2004 Sep 15; 78(5):641-6.
Score: 0.022
-
The need for consistency in 407 reviews. Pediatrics. 2004 Sep; 114(3):901-2; author reply 901-2.
Score: 0.022
-
Convening a 407 panel for research not otherwise approvable: "Precursors to diabetes in Japanese American youth" as a case study. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004 Jun; 14(2):165-86.
Score: 0.021
-
Graft Survival of En Bloc Deceased Donor Kidneys Transplants Compared With Single Kidney Transplants. Transplantation. 2024 10 01; 108(10):2127-2133.
Score: 0.021
-
Incorporating newborn screening into prenatal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr; 190(4):876-7.
Score: 0.021
-
Ethical assessment of clinical asthma trials including children subjects. Pediatrics. 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 1):87-94.
Score: 0.021
-
Certificates of confidentiality in research: rationale and usage. Genet Test. 2004; 8(2):214-20.
Score: 0.021
-
Children in medical research: balancing protection and access--has the pendulum swung too far? Perspect Biol Med. 2004; 47(4):519-36.
Score: 0.021
-
Informed consent in pediatric research. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2004; 13(4):346-58.
Score: 0.021
-
Are minority children under- or overrepresented in pediatric research? Pediatrics. 2003 Oct; 112(4):890-5.
Score: 0.020
-
Whether and why pediatric researchers report race and ethnicity. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Jul; 157(7):671-5.
Score: 0.020
-
Lethal language, lethal decisions. Hastings Cent Rep. 2003 Mar-Apr; 33(2):37-41.
Score: 0.020
-
Do healthy children deserve greater protection in medical research? J Pediatr. 2003 Feb; 142(2):108-12.
Score: 0.019
-
Professional and personal attitudes about access and confidentiality in the genetic testing of children: a pilot study. Genet Test. 2003; 7(2):123-30.
Score: 0.019
-
The ethics of type 1 diabetes prediction and prevention research. Theor Med Bioeth. 2003; 24(2):177-97.
Score: 0.019
-
Race in the Reading: A Study of Problematic Uses of Race and Ethnicity in a Prominent Pediatrics Textbook. Acad Med. 2022 10 01; 97(10):1521-1527.
Score: 0.019
-
Are doctors altruistic? J Med Ethics. 2002 Apr; 28(2):68-9; discussion 74-6.
Score: 0.018
-
Revise the Uniform Determination of Death Act to Align the Law With Practice Through Neurorespiratory Criteria. Neurology. 2022 03 29; 98(13):532-536.
Score: 0.018
-
In defense of the Hopkins Lead Abatement Studies. J Law Med Ethics. 2002; 30(1):50-7.
Score: 0.018
-
Media appeals for directed altruistic living liver donations: lessons from Camilo Sandoval Ewen. Perspect Biol Med. 2002; 45(3):329-37.
Score: 0.018
-
Patient autonomy: imperfect, insufficient, but still quite necessary. J Clin Ethics. 2002; 13(1):57-62.
Score: 0.018
-
(Women and) children first: applicable to lifeboats? Applicable to human experimentation? J Health Care Law Policy. 2002; 6(1):14-33.
Score: 0.018
-
Ethical issues in pediatric trials. Am Heart J. 2001 Aug; 142(2):233-6.
Score: 0.018
-
Genetic exceptionalism vs. paradigm shift: lessons from HIV. J Law Med Ethics. 2001; 29(2):141-8.
Score: 0.017
-
Reopening Schools Safely: The Case for Collaboration, Constructive Disruption of Pre-Coronavirus 2019 Expectations, and Creative Solutions. J Pediatr. 2020 08; 223:183-185.
Score: 0.016
-
Donating a second kidney: a tale of family and ethics. Semin Dial. 2000 May-Jun; 13(3):201-3.
Score: 0.016
-
Health Care Surrogacy Laws Do Not Adequately Address the Needs of Minors. Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 Mar; 50(2):16-18.
Score: 0.016
-
Patient confidentiality and the surrogate's right to know. J Law Med Ethics. 2000; 28(2):137-43.
Score: 0.016
-
Association of Transplant Center With Survival Benefit Among Adults Undergoing Heart Transplant in the United States. JAMA. 2019 11 12; 322(18):1789-1798.
Score: 0.016
-
Protect NIH's DNA advisory committee. Science. 2018 10 26; 362(6413):409-410.
Score: 0.014
-
Paired exchanges should be part of the solution to ABO incompatibility in living donor kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 1998 Aug 15; 66(3):406-7.
Score: 0.014
-
Health care decisionmaking by children. Is it in their best interest? Hastings Cent Rep. 1997 Nov-Dec; 27(6):41-5.
Score: 0.013
-
Consent for clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jul 24; 337(4):282.
Score: 0.013
-
Religious exemptions to the immunization statutes: balancing public health and religious freedom. J Law Med Ethics. 1997 Summer-Fall; 25(2-3):202-9, 83.
Score: 0.013
-
Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework. Stanford Law Pol Rev. 1997; 8(1):159-76.
Score: 0.013
-
Adolescent sexuality and public policy: an unrepentant liberal approach. Politics Life Sci. 1996 Sep; 15(2):323-8.
Score: 0.012
-
Adolescent sexuality and public policy: a liberal response. Politics Life Sci. 1996 Mar; 15(1):13-21.
Score: 0.012
-
Racial disparities in reaching the renal transplant waitlist: is geography as important as race? Clin Transplant. 2015 Jun; 29(6):531-8.
Score: 0.011
-
Arguments against health care autonomy for minors. Bioethics Forum. 1995; 11(4):22-6.
Score: 0.011
-
Justice for children: the child as organ donor. Bioethics. 1994 Apr; 8(2):105-26.
Score: 0.011
-
Communicating with parents about immunization safety: messages for pediatricians in the IOM report "the childhood immunization schedule and safety: stakeholder concerns, scientific evidence, and future studies". Acad Pediatr. 2013 Sep-Oct; 13(5):387-9.
Score: 0.010
-
The OHRP and SUPPORT. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 20; 368(25):e36.
Score: 0.010
-
Neighborhood poverty, racial composition and renal transplant waitlist. Am J Transplant. 2010 Aug; 10(8):1912-7.
Score: 0.008
-
American academy of pediatrics policy statements on bioethics: summaries and commentaries: part 3. Pediatr Rev. 2008 May; 29(5):e28-34.
Score: 0.007
-
American Academy of Pediatrics policy statements on bioethics: summaries and commentaries: part 2. Pediatr Rev. 2008 Mar; 29(3):e15-22.
Score: 0.007
-
American Academy of Pediatrics policy statements on bioethics: summaries and commentaries: part 1. Pediatr Rev. 2008 Jan; 29(1):e1-8.
Score: 0.007