The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Rita Nanda and Olufunmilayo Olopade.
Connection Strength

2.174
  1. Genetic testing in an ethnically diverse cohort of high-risk women: a comparative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in American families of European and African ancestry. JAMA. 2005 Oct 19; 294(15):1925-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.274
  2. Race, Gene Expression Signatures, and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Early Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 01; 6(12):e2349646.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.240
  3. Molecular profiling of a real-world breast cancer cohort with genetically inferred ancestries reveals actionable tumor biology differences between European ancestry and African ancestry patient populations. Breast Cancer Res. 2023 05 25; 25(1):58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  4. Racial Disparities in Pathological Complete Response Among Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 03 01; 6(3):e233329.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  5. The role of tumor-associated macrophages in breast cancer progression (review). Int J Oncol. 2013 Jul; 43(1):5-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  6. Population differences in breast cancer: survey in indigenous African women reveals over-representation of triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 20; 27(27):4515-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  7. Advances in breast cancer: pathways to personalized medicine. Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Dec 15; 14(24):7988-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  8. Estrogen receptor alpha, BRCA1, and FANCF promoter methylation occur in distinct subsets of sporadic breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Sep; 111(1):113-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  9. BRCA1 promoter methylation in sporadic breast cancer is associated with reduced BRCA1 copy number and chromosome 17 aneusomy. Cancer Res. 2005 Dec 01; 65(23):10692-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  10. Validation of the RSClin risk calculator in the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer. 2024 Apr 15; 130(8):1210-1220.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  11. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Telemedicine Utilization and Satisfaction Among Breast Cancer Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Analysis. Telemed J E Health. 2024 Mar; 30(3):651-663.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  12. Stress, Isolation, and Sleep Quality among Breast Cancer Survivors throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study in a Multi-Ethnic Cohort. Res Sq. 2023 Aug 10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  13. Integration of clinical features and deep learning on pathology for the prediction of breast cancer recurrence assays and risk of recurrence. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023 Apr 14; 9(1):25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  14. Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of ERBB2-Low Breast Cancer Among Patients in the National Cancer Database. JAMA Oncol. 2023 04 01; 9(4):500-510.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  15. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated With Familiarity, Interest, and Use of Integrative Therapies Among Patients With Breast Cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. 2023 Jan-Dec; 22:15347354231185122.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  16. The impact of site-specific digital histology signatures on deep learning model accuracy and bias. Nat Commun. 2021 07 20; 12(1):4423.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  17. Racial disparities in survival outcomes among breast cancer patients by molecular subtypes. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Feb; 185(3):841-849.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  18. Association of Event-Free and Distant Recurrence-Free Survival With Individual-Level Pathologic Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stages 2 and 3 Breast Cancer: Three-Year Follow-up Analysis for the I-SPY2 Adaptively Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 09 01; 6(9):1355-1362.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  19. Clinical evaluation of germline polymorphisms associated with capecitabine toxicity in breast cancer: TBCRC-015. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun; 181(3):623-633.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  20. Pharmacogenomics-Based Point-of-Care Clinical Decision Support Significantly Alters Drug Prescribing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Nov; 102(5):859-869.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  21. Adaptive Randomization of Veliparib-Carboplatin Treatment in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 07; 375(1):23-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  22. The Neoadjuvant Model Is Still the Future for Drug Development in Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Jul 01; 21(13):2911-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  23. A phase I trial of the IGF-1R antibody Cixutumumab in combination with temsirolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 May; 139(1):145-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  24. Adaptive trials in the neoadjuvant setting: a model to safely tailor care while accelerating drug development. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 20; 30(36):4584-6; author reply 4588-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  25. A genome-wide screen for promoter methylation in lung cancer identifies novel methylation markers for multiple malignancies. PLoS Med. 2006 Dec; 3(12):e486.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  26. The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms. BMC Genomics. 2006 Apr 27; 7:96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  27. Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2006 Feb; 19(2):264-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.