The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Abraham Dachman to Colonography, Computed Tomographic

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Abraham Dachman has written about Colonography, Computed Tomographic.
Abraham Dachman
Connection Strength
11.916
Colonography, Computed Tomographic
  1. To Wait or to Act: How CT Colonography Can Improve Management of Colorectal Polyps. Radiology. 2024 01; 310(1):e232975.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.778
  2. Pearls and Pitfalls of Interpretation in CT Colonography. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2020 May; 71(2):140-148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.593
  3. Structured reporting and quality control in CT colonography. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 03; 43(3):566-573.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.519
  4. Errors in CT colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct; 40(7):2099-111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.439
  5. CT colonography with computer-aided detection: recognizing the causes of false-positive reader results. Radiographics. 2014 Nov-Dec; 34(7):1885-905.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.412
  6. The challenges of CT colonography reimbursement. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Dec; 10(12):937-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.387
  7. BMI-based radiation dose reduction in CT colonography. Acad Radiol. 2013 Apr; 20(4):486-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.369
  8. Interpretation of CT colonographic images: should we rely on nonradiologists? Radiology. 2012 Sep; 264(3):624-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.355
  9. CAD-associated reader error in CT colonography. Acad Radiol. 2012 Jul; 19(7):801-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.346
  10. Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial. Radiology. 2010 Sep; 256(3):827-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.307
  11. CT colonography: advanced computer-aided detection scheme utilizing MTANNs for detection of "missed" polyps in a multicenter clinical trial. Med Phys. 2010 Jan; 37(1):12-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.295
  12. Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec; 193(6):1561-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.293
  13. Comparison of optical colonoscopy and CT colonography for polyp detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Nov; 193(5):1289-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.292
  14. Comparison of 2D and 3D views for evaluation of flat lesions in CT colonography. Acad Radiol. 2010 Jan; 17(1):39-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.288
  15. Flat lesions in CT colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2010 Oct; 35(5):578-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.286
  16. Formative evaluation of standardized training for CT colonographic image interpretation by novice readers. Radiology. 2008 Oct; 249(1):167-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.270
  17. Economic impact of extracolonic findings at computed tomographic colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Jul-Aug; 32(4):497-503.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.266
  18. Quality of CT colonography-related web sites for consumers. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Apr; 5(4):593-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.261
  19. CT colonography: false-negative interpretations. Radiology. 2007 Jul; 244(1):165-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  20. CT colonography: visualization methods, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 Mar; 45(2):347-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.242
  21. Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study. Abdom Imaging. 2007 Jan-Feb; 32(1):96-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.235
  22. Advice for optimizing colonic distention and minimizing risk of perforation during CT colonography. Radiology. 2006 May; 239(2):317-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.229
  23. Cecal mobility: a potential pitfall of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Apr; 186(4):1086-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.227
  24. Characterization of normal ileocecal valve density on CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006 Jan-Feb; 30(1):58-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  25. CAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2005 Jan-Feb; 30(1):26-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  26. The effect of reconstruction algorithm on conspicuity of polyps in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Nov; 183(5):1349-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.206
  27. Computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2004 Oct; 25(5):419-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  28. Quality and consistency in CT colonography and research reporting. Radiology. 2004 Feb; 230(2):319-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  29. CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS): Version 2023 Update. Radiology. 2024 01; 310(1):e232007.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.195
  30. Virtual colonoscopy: past, present, and future. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003 Mar; 41(2):377-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  31. Computed tomography colonography and colon cancer screening. Semin Roentgenol. 2003 Jan; 38(1):54-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  32. Virtual colonoscopy. Potential clinical applications of a new technique. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2002 Sep; 31(3):747-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  33. Automated knowledge-guided segmentation of colonic walls for computerized detection of polyps in CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002 Jul-Aug; 26(4):493-504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  34. Diagnostic performance of virtual colonoscopy. Abdom Imaging. 2002 May-Jun; 27(3):260-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  35. Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. Radiology. 2002 Feb; 222(2):327-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  36. Use of Screening CT Colonography by Age and Race: A Study of Potential Access Barriers Related to Medicare Noncoverage Based on Data From the ACR's National CT Colonography Registry. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Jan; 18(1 Pt A):19-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  37. CT colonography's role in the COVID-19 pandemic: a safe(r), socially distanced total colon examination. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 02; 46(2):486-490.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  38. The Added Value of the CT Colonography Reporting and Data System. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Aug; 13(8):931-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  39. CT colonography for the detection of nonpolypoid adenomas: sensitivity assessed with restricted national CT colonography trial criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Dec; 203(6):W614-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  40. Suspected extracolonic neoplasms detected on CT colonography: literature review and possible outcomes. Acad Radiol. 2013 Jun; 20(6):667-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  41. The National CT Colonography Trial: assessment of accuracy in participants 65 years of age and older. Radiology. 2012 May; 263(2):401-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  42. National CT colonography trial (ACRIN 6664): comparison of three full-laxative bowel preparations in more than 2500 average-risk patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 May; 196(5):1076-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  43. ACRIN CT colonography trial: does reader's preference for primary two-dimensional versus primary three-dimensional interpretation affect performance? Radiology. 2011 May; 259(2):435-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  44. Can radiologist training and testing ensure high performance in CT colonography? Lessons From the National CT Colonography Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jul; 195(1):117-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  45. ACR Colon Cancer Committee white paper: status of CT colonography 2009. J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 Nov; 6(11):756-772.e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  46. CT colonography polyp matching: differences between experienced readers. Eur Radiol. 2009 Jul; 19(7):1723-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  47. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 18; 359(12):1207-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  48. Mixture of expert 3D massive-training ANNs for reduction of multiple types of false positives in CAD for detection of polyps in CT colonography. Med Phys. 2008 Feb; 35(2):694-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  49. Computed tomographic colonography: clinical value. Abdom Imaging. 2007 Sep-Oct; 32(5):541-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  50. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology. 2005 Jul; 236(1):3-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  51. Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography. Acad Radiol. 2005 Jun; 12(6):695-707.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  52. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet. 2005 Jan 22-28; 365(9456):305-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  53. Virtual colonoscopy. JAMA. 2004 Jul 28; 292(4):431-2; author reply 433.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  54. Computerized detection of colorectal masses in CT colonography based on fuzzy merging and wall-thickening analysis. Med Phys. 2004 Apr; 31(4):860-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  55. What's new in ACS Surgery: principles and practice. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2004 Apr; 89(4):60-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  56. Computerized tomographic colonography: performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting. Gastroenterology. 2003 Sep; 125(3):688-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  57. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. Radiographics. 2002 Jul-Aug; 22(4):963-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.