The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Molly Przeworski to Models, Genetic

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Molly Przeworski has written about Models, Genetic.
Connection Strength

3.888
  1. The distribution of highly deleterious variants across human ancestry groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 27; 122(21):e2503857122.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.626
  2. Contrasting Determinants of Mutation Rates in Germline and Soma. Genetics. 2017 09; 207(1):255-267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.364
  3. Interpreting the Dependence of Mutation Rates on Age and Time. PLoS Biol. 2016 Jan; 14(1):e1002355.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.327
  4. A new approach to estimate parameters of speciation models with application to apes. Genome Res. 2007 Oct; 17(10):1505-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  5. The signature of positive selection on standing genetic variation. Evolution. 2005 Nov; 59(11):2312-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  6. Directional positive selection on an allele of arbitrary dominance. Genetics. 2006 Jan; 172(1):713-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  7. The clock-like accumulation of germline and somatic mutations can arise from the interplay of DNA damage and repair. PLoS Biol. 2024 Jun; 22(6):e3002678.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  8. Insights into recombination from patterns of linkage disequilibrium in humans. Genetics. 2004 May; 167(1):387-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  9. Evidence for population growth in humans is confounded by fine-scale population structure. Trends Genet. 2002 Nov; 18(11):559-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  10. Testing models of selection and demography in Drosophila simulans. Genetics. 2002 Sep; 162(1):203-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  11. The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics. 2002 Mar; 160(3):1179-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  12. Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Jul; 69(1):1-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  13. Why is there so little intragenic linkage disequilibrium in humans? Genet Res. 2001 Apr; 77(2):143-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  14. The evolution of group differences in changing environments. PLoS Biol. 2021 01; 19(1):e3001072.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  15. A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila. Genetics. 2000 Sep; 156(1):257-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  16. A comparison of humans and baboons suggests germline mutation rates do not track cell divisions. PLoS Biol. 2020 08; 18(8):e3000838.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  17. Measuring intolerance to mutation in human genetics. Nat Genet. 2019 05; 51(5):772-776.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  18. Genealogies and weak purifying selection. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Feb; 16(2):246-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  19. Identifying genetic variants that affect viability in large cohorts. PLoS Biol. 2017 Sep; 15(9):e2002458.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  20. An estimate of the average number of recessive lethal mutations carried by humans. Genetics. 2015 Apr; 199(4):1243-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  21. A population genetics-phylogenetics approach to inferring natural selection in coding sequences. PLoS Genet. 2011 Dec; 7(12):e1002395.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  22. Classic selective sweeps were rare in recent human evolution. Science. 2011 Feb 18; 331(6019):920-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  23. An evolutionary view of human recombination. Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Jan; 8(1):23-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  24. How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps? Genome Res. 2006 Jun; 16(6):702-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  25. Causal interpretations of family GWAS in the presence of heterogeneous effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 17; 121(38):e2401379121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  26. Estimating the time since the fixation of a beneficial allele. Genetics. 2003 Aug; 164(4):1667-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  27. A neutral explanation for the correlation of diversity with recombination rates in humans. Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Jun; 72(6):1527-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  28. When did the human population size start increasing? Genetics. 2000 Aug; 155(4):1865-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  29. Deconstructing the sources of genotype-phenotype associations in humans. Science. 2019 09 27; 365(6460):1396-1400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  30. The population genetics of human disease: The case of recessive, lethal mutations. PLoS Genet. 2017 Sep; 13(9):e1006915.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  31. The ABO blood group is a trans-species polymorphism in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 06; 109(45):18493-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  32. Shifts in the intensity of purifying selection: an analysis of genome-wide polymorphism data from two closely related yeast species. Genome Res. 2010 Nov; 20(11):1558-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  33. Combining sperm typing and linkage disequilibrium analyses reveals differences in selective pressures or recombination rates across human populations. Genetics. 2007 Feb; 175(2):795-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  34. Absence of the TAP2 human recombination hotspot in chimpanzees. PLoS Biol. 2004 Jun; 2(6):e155.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.