 Connection
Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Kiran Thakrar and Uday Mehta.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.308 |
|
|
|
-
Adegunsoye A, Oldham JM, Bonham C, Hrusch C, Nolan P, Klejch W, Bellam S, Mehta U, Thakrar K, Pugashetti JV, Husain AN, Montner SM, Straus CM, Vij R, Sperling AI, Noth I, Strek ME, Chung JH. Prognosticating Outcomes in Interstitial Lung Disease by Mediastinal Lymph Node Assessment. An Observational Cohort Study with Independent Validation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 03 15; 199(6):747-759.
Score: 0.049
-
Gore RM, Silvers RI, Thakrar KH, Wenzke DR, Mehta UK, Newmark GM, Berlin JW. Bowel Obstruction. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Nov; 53(6):1225-40.
Score: 0.039
-
Gore RM, Wenzke DR, Thakrar KH, Newmark GM, Mehta UK, Berlin JW. The incidental cystic pancreas mass: a practical approach. Cancer Imaging. 2012 Sep 28; 12:414-21.
Score: 0.032
-
Gore RM, Thakrar KH, Wenzke DR, Newmark GM, Mehta UK, Berlin JW. That liver lesion on MDCT in the oncology patient: is it important? Cancer Imaging. 2012 Sep 28; 12:373-84.
Score: 0.032
-
Gore RM, Newmark GM, Thakrar KH, Mehta UK, Berlin JW. Hepatic incidentalomas. Radiol Clin North Am. 2011 Mar; 49(2):291-322.
Score: 0.028
-
Gore RM, Newmark GM, Thakrar KH, Mehta UK, Berlin JW. Pelvic incidentalomas. Cancer Imaging. 2010 Oct 04; 10 Spec no A:S15-26.
Score: 0.028
-
Gore RM, Thakrar KH, Newmark GM, Mehta UK, Berlin JW. Gallbladder imaging. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2010 Jun; 39(2):265-87, ix.
Score: 0.027
-
Gore RM, Newmark GM, Thakrar KH, Mehta UK, Berlin JW. Pathways of abdominal tumour spread: the role of the subperitoneal space. Cancer Imaging. 2009 Dec 24; 9:112-20.
Score: 0.026
-
Gore RM, Yaghmai V, Thakrar KH, Berlin JW, Mehta UK, Newmark GM, Miller FH. Imaging in intestinal ischemic disorders. Radiol Clin North Am. 2008 Sep; 46(5):845-75, v.
Score: 0.024
-
Gore RM, Thakrar KH, Mehta UK, Berlin J, Yaghmai V, Newmark GM. Imaging in intestinal ischemic disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Aug; 6(8):849-58.
Score: 0.024
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|