The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Richard Schilsky to Biomedical Research

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Richard Schilsky has written about Biomedical Research.
Connection Strength

2.731
  1. Optimizing public-private partnerships to support clinical cancer research. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Jul 01; 117(7):1305-1310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.650
  2. Broadening Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends of Cancer Research Joint Research Statement. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20; 35(33):3737-3744.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.380
  3. Translating the cancer genome into clinically useful tools and strategies. Dis Model Mech. 2009 Sep-Oct; 2(9-10):426-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.217
  4. American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement on minimum standards and exemplary attributes of clinical trial sites. J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 20; 26(15):2562-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  5. The role of cooperative groups in cancer clinical trials. Cancer Treat Res. 2007; 132:111-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  6. Defining the role of pragmatic clinical trials in cancer clinical research: outcomes of a collaborative workshop hosted by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2025 May; 26(5):e253-e263.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  7. Continuing to Broaden Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative and Inclusive: ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Joint Research Statement. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 05 01; 27(9):2394-2399.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  8. Clinical Cancer Advances 2021: ASCO's Report on Progress Against Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021 04 01; 39(10):1165-1184.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  9. American Society of Clinical Oncology Road to Recovery Report: Learning From the COVID-19 Experience to Improve Clinical Research and Cancer Care. J Clin Oncol. 2021 01 10; 39(2):155-169.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  10. Development and Validation of a Natural Language Processing Tool to Generate the CONSORT Reporting Checklist for Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 10 01; 3(10):e2014661.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  11. Progress in Cancer Research, Prevention, and Care. N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 03; 383(10):897-900.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  12. Clinical Cancer Advances 2017: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer From the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2017 04 20; 35(12):1341-1367.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  13. Breaking a vicious cycle. Sci Transl Med. 2013 Jul 31; 5(196):196cm6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  14. Strategies to overcome clinical, regulatory, and financial challenges in the implementation of personalized medicine. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2013; 118-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  15. Toward efficient trials in colorectal cancer: the ARCAD Clinical Trials Program. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 01; 28(4):527-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  16. Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Prior Therapies Work Group. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 05 01; 27(9):2408-2415.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  17. Biological, clinical, and psychosocial correlates at the interface of cancer and aging research. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Apr 18; 104(8):581-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  18. Clinical cancer advances 2007: major research advances in cancer treatment, prevention, and screening--a report from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 10; 26(2):313-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  19. Processes to activate phase III clinical trials in a Cooperative Oncology Group: the Case of Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 01; 24(28):4553-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.