The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Valluvan Jeevanandam and Nitasha Sarswat.
Connection Strength

2.735
  1. Cardiac Reserve as Assessed by Augmentation in Cardiac Power Efficiency Predicts Response to Intravascular Ventricular Assist System Support. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Apr; 39(4S):S350-S351.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  2. Prophylactic Use for Driveline Infections: Can we Prevent Infection Resulting from Trauma? J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Apr; 39(4S):S489.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  3. Impact of prophylactic donor heart tricuspid valve annuloplasty on outcomes in heart transplantation. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Oct 12; 18(1):288.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  4. Concomitant left atrial appendage closure during left ventricular assist device surgery can reduce ischaemic cerebrovascular accidents. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Jul 12; 36(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  5. Status One and Status Two Exception Use in the Updated Heart Allocation System. J Card Fail. 2023 06; 29(6):963-967.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  6. The prognostic role of advanced hemodynamic variables in patients with left ventricular assist devices. Artif Organs. 2023 Mar; 47(3):574-581.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  7. Postoperative tolvaptan use in left ventricular assist device patients: The TOLVAD randomized pilot study. Artif Organs. 2022 Sep 15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  8. Clinical outcomes of grafted vs. percutaneous axillary intra-aortic balloon pump support as a bridge to transplantation: a propensity score-matched analysis. Heart Vessels. 2022 Dec; 37(12):1995-2001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  9. Comparing short-term/long-term outcomes of heart transplants that occur inside and outside of normal working hours. ESC Heart Fail. 2022 08; 9(4):2484-2490.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  10. Significant vascular complications in percutaneous axillary intra-aortic balloon pump. Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Jul; 83:42-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  11. Proximal ascending aorta size is associated with the incidence of de novo aortic insufficiency with left ventricular assist device. Heart Vessels. 2022 Apr; 37(4):647-653.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  12. Discordance between lactic acidemia and hemodynamics in patients with advanced heart failure. Clin Cardiol. 2021 May; 44(5):636-645.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  13. Increased Rate of Pump Thrombosis and Cardioembolic Events Following Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Devices. ASAIO J. 2020 Nov/Dec; 66(10):1127-1136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  14. Correction to: A subcostal approach is favorable compared to sternotomy for left ventricular assist device exchange. J Artif Organs. 2020 Sep; 23(3):302.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  15. Outcomes of Ambulatory Axillary Intraaortic Balloon Pump as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 04; 111(4):1264-1270.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  16. Prognostication of Residual Mitral Regurgitation or Aortic Insufficiency after Invasive Hemodynamic Ramp Optimization. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Apr; 39(4S):S117.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  17. Long Term Survival after Heart Transplantation is Not Affected by Axillary Intra Aortic Balloon Pump Support as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Apr; 39(4S):S281-S282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  18. Outflow Cannula Systolic Slope as a Predictor of Myocardial Recovery Leading to Successful LVAD Decommission: A Case Series. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Apr; 39(4S):S345.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  19. Absence of Aortic Valve Opening after Hemodynamic Ramp Optimization Study Does Not Impact LVAD Morbidity of Mortality. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Apr; 39(4S):S351.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  20. Clinical Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation for Patients Refusing Blood Transfusion. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Apr; 39(4S):S427.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  21. Impact of Prophylactic Donor Heart Tricuspid Valve Annuloplasty in Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Heart Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Apr; 39(4S):S44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  22. Increased Rate of Pump Thrombosis and Cardioembolic Events Following Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Devices. ASAIO J. 2020 Mar 27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  23. Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Tolvaptan in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices. ASAIO J. 2020 03; 66(3):253-257.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  24. Combined Left Ventricular Assist Device and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: Should We Bypass the Bypass? ASAIO J. 2020 01; 66(1):32-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  25. Estimation of Central Venous Pressure by Pacemaker Lead Impedances in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients. ASAIO J. 2020 01; 66(1):49-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  26. Surgical device exchange provides improved clinical outcomes compared to medical therapy in treating continuous-flow left ventricular assist device thrombosis. Artif Organs. 2020 Apr; 44(4):367-374.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  27. Metabolic Dysfunction in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices Patients and Outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 11 19; 8(22):e013278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  28. Discordance Between Clinical Assessment and Invasive Hemodynamics in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure. J Card Fail. 2020 Feb; 26(2):128-135.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  29. Association of Inflow Cannula Position with Left Ventricular Unloading and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device. ASAIO J. 2019 May/Jun; 65(4):331-335.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  30. A subcostal approach is favorable compared to sternotomy for left ventricular assist device exchange field of research: artificial heart (clinical). J Artif Organs. 2019 Sep; 22(3):181-187.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  31. Optimal Hemodynamics During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support Are Associated With Reduced Readmission Rates. Circ Heart Fail. 2019 02; 12(2):e005094.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  32. Outflow Cannula Systolic Slope in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Novel Marker of Myocardial Contractility. ASAIO J. 2019 02; 65(2):160-166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  33. Home Inotropes in Patients Supported with Left Ventricular Assist Devices. ASAIO J. 2019 01; 65(1):e7-e11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  34. Optimal haemodynamics during left ventricular assist device support are associated with reduced haemocompatibility-related adverse events. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 05; 21(5):655-662.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  35. Improvement in Biventricular Cardiac Function After Ambulatory Counterpulsation. J Card Fail. 2019 Jan; 25(1):20-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  36. Repeated Ramp Tests on Stable LVAD Patients Reveal Patient-Specific Hemodynamic Fingerprint. ASAIO J. 2018 Nov/Dec; 64(6):701-707.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  37. Omega-3 Therapy Is Associated With Reduced Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device. Circ Heart Fail. 2018 10; 11(10):e005082.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  38. Impact of Residual Valve Disease on Survival After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 12; 106(6):1789-1796.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  39. Decoupling Between Diastolic Pulmonary Arterial Pressure and Pulmonary Arterial Wedge Pressure at Incremental Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Speeds Is Associated With Worse Prognosis After LVAD Implantation. J Card Fail. 2018 Sep; 24(9):575-582.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  40. Echocardiographic Predictors of Hemodynamics in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Devices. J Card Fail. 2018 Sep; 24(9):561-567.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  41. Increase in short-term risk of rejection in heart transplant patients receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 11; 37(11):1322-1328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  42. Increased Risk of Bleeding in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients Treated with Enoxaparin as Bridge to Therapeutic International Normalized Ratio. ASAIO J. 2018 Mar/Apr; 64(2):140-146.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  43. Long-Acting Octreotide Reduces the Recurrence of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device. J Card Fail. 2018 Apr; 24(4):249-254.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  44. Predictors of Hemodynamic Improvement and Stabilization Following Intraaortic Balloon Pump Implantation in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 02; 30(2):56-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  45. Consequences of Retained Defibrillator and Pacemaker Leads After Heart Transplantation-An Underrecognized Problem. J Card Fail. 2018 02; 24(2):101-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  46. HVAD Waveform Analysis as a Noninvasive Marker of Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure: A First Step Toward the Development of a Smart Left Ventricular Assist Device Pump. ASAIO J. 2018 Jan/Feb; 64(1):10-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  47. Cannula and Pump Positions Are Associated With Left Ventricular Unloading and Clinical Outcome in Patients With HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device. J Card Fail. 2018 03; 24(3):159-166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  48. Decoupling Between Diastolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure and Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure as a Prognostic Factor After Continuous Flow Ventricular Assist Device Implantation. Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Sep; 10(9).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  49. The Hemodynamic Effects of Aortic Insufficiency in Patients Supported With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices. J Card Fail. 2017 Jul; 23(7):545-551.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  50. 3D Morphological Changes in LV and RV During LVAD Ramp Studies. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 02; 11(2 Pt 1):159-169.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  51. Surgically Corrected Mitral Regurgitation During Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Is Associated With Low Recurrence Rate and Improved Midterm Survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Mar; 103(3):725-733.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  52. Left Ventricular Assist Device Deactivation via Percutaneous Closure of the Outflow Graft. J Card Fail. 2016 Aug; 22(8):653-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  53. Screening for Outflow Cannula Malfunction of Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) With the Use of Doppler Echocardiography: New LVAD-Specific Reference Values for Contemporary Devices. J Card Fail. 2016 Oct; 22(10):808-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  54. Novel echocardiographic parameters of aortic insufficiency in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices and clinical outcome. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 08; 35(8):976-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  55. Hemodynamic Ramp Tests in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices. JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Mar; 4(3):208-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.