The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Mark Talamonti to United States

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mark Talamonti has written about United States.
Connection Strength

0.422
  1. Small bowel cancer in the United States: changes in epidemiology, treatment, and survival over the last 20 years. Ann Surg. 2009 Jan; 249(1):63-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  2. Multimodality therapy for pancreatic cancer in the U.S. : utilization, outcomes, and the effect of hospital volume. Cancer. 2007 Sep 15; 110(6):1227-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  3. Validation of the 6th edition AJCC Pancreatic Cancer Staging System: report from the National Cancer Database. Cancer. 2007 Aug 15; 110(4):738-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  4. National failure to operate on early stage pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2007 Aug; 246(2):173-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  5. The minimally invasive approach confers improved outcomes in frail cancer patients undergoing hepatectomy: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul; 28(7):1017-1026.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  6. Number of Hepatic Resections and Association with Complication after Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Debulking: An American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2023 07 01; 237(1):157-168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  7. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: is the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula comparable to that after open pancreatoduodenectomy? Surgery. 2018 03; 163(3):587-593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  8. Does adjuvant radiation provide any survival benefit after an R1 resections for pancreatic cancer? Surgery. 2018 05; 163(5):1047-1052.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  9. The extent of vascular resection is associated with perioperative outcome in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2018 02; 20(2):140-146.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  10. Management of Incidental Liver Lesions on CT: A White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov; 14(11):1429-1437.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  11. Using the NSQIP Pancreatic Demonstration Project to Derive a Modified Fistula Risk Score for Preoperative Risk Stratification in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 May; 224(5):816-825.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  12. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma provides short-term oncologic outcomes and long-term overall survival rates similar to those for open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2017 Mar; 213(3):512-515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  13. Neoadjuvant external beam radiation is associated with No benefit in overall survival for early stage pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg. 2017 Mar; 213(3):521-525.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  14. External radiation is associated with limited improvement in overall survival in resected margin-negative stage IIB pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Surgery. 2016 12; 160(6):1466-1476.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  15. Early National Experience with Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Comparison of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jul; 221(1):175-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  16. Surgical resection provides an overall survival benefit for patients with small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jan; 19(1):117-23; discussion 123.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  17. Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2014 Aug; 260(2):372-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  18. Cancer recurrence: an important but missing variable in national cancer registries. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 May; 21(5):1520-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  19. Wait times for cancer surgery in the United States: trends and predictors of delays. Ann Surg. 2011 Apr; 253(4):779-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  20. Assessment of pancreatic cancer care in the United States based on formally developed quality indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 16; 101(12):848-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  21. Acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas in the United States: prognostic factors and comparison to ductal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Dec; 12(12):2078-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  22. Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 17; 100(18):1310-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  23. Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct 01; 26(28):4626-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  24. Sociodemographic and tumor characteristics associated with pancreatic cancer surgery in the United States. J Surg Oncol. 2008 Jun 01; 97(7):578-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  25. Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: utilization and outcomes of recommended treatment in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jul; 15(7):1948-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  26. Complete lymph node dissection for sentinel node-positive melanoma: assessment of practice patterns in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jun; 15(6):1566-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  27. Impact of tumor location on nodal evaluation for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Feb; 51(2):154-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  28. Utilization of total thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer in the United States. Surgery. 2007 Dec; 142(6):906-13; discussion 913.e1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  29. Society of Surgical Oncology: statement on genetic testing for cancer susceptibilty. Committee on Issues and Governmental Affairs of the Society of Surgical Oncology. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999 Jul-Aug; 6(5):507-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.