The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Mark Talamonti to Logistic Models

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mark Talamonti has written about Logistic Models.
Connection Strength

0.319
  1. Pancreatic cancer thromboembolic outcomes: rate of thrombosis after adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma pancreatic cancer surgery. Int Angiol. 2019 Jun; 38(3):194-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  2. Multimodality therapy for pancreatic cancer in the U.S. : utilization, outcomes, and the effect of hospital volume. Cancer. 2007 Sep 15; 110(6):1227-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  3. Risk factors for complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A NSQIP analysis with propensity score matching. J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug; 122(2):183-194.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  4. Early National Experience with Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Comparison of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jul; 221(1):175-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  5. Reflux control is important in the management of Barrett's Esophagus: results from a retrospective 1,830 patient cohort. Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec; 29(12):3528-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  6. Wait times for cancer surgery in the United States: trends and predictors of delays. Ann Surg. 2011 Apr; 253(4):779-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  7. Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 17; 100(18):1310-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  8. Adequacy and importance of lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Feb; 206(2):247-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  9. Learning sentinel node biopsy: results of a prospective randomized trial of two techniques. Surgery. 1999 Oct; 126(4):714-20; discussion 720-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.