The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Matthew Kirkpatrick to Double-Blind Method

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Matthew Kirkpatrick has written about Double-Blind Method.
Connection Strength

1.158
  1. Effects of non-tobacco flavors and nicotine on e-cigarette product appeal among young adult never, former, and current smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 10 01; 203:99-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  2. Effects of acute doses of prosocial drugs methamphetamine and alcohol on plasma oxytocin levels. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Jun; 35(3):308-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  3. Prosocial effects of MDMA: A measure of generosity. J Psychopharmacol. 2015 Jun; 29(6):661-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  4. MDMA: a social drug in a social context. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Mar; 232(6):1155-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  5. MDMA effects consistent across laboratories. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Oct; 231(19):3899-905.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  6. Effects of MDMA and Intranasal oxytocin on social and emotional processing. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Jun; 39(7):1654-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  7. In the company of others: social factors alter acute alcohol effects. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Nov; 230(2):215-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  8. Personality and the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans. J Psychopharmacol. 2013 Mar; 27(3):256-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  9. Comparison of intranasal methamphetamine and d-amphetamine self-administration by humans. Addiction. 2012 Apr; 107(4):783-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  10. Effects of intranasal methamphetamine on metacognition of agency. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Mar; 197(1):137-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  11. Detection of acute 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) effects across protocols using automated natural language processing. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020 04; 45(5):823-832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  12. Rewarding effects of physical activity predict sensitivity to the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in healthy volunteers. J Psychopharmacol. 2018 03; 32(3):302-308.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  13. Validation of a behavioral economic purchase task for assessing drug abuse liability. Addict Biol. 2019 03; 24(2):303-314.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  14. Pharmacogenetics of stimulant abuse liability: association of CDH13 variant with amphetamine response in a racially-heterogeneous sample of healthy young adults. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Jan; 234(2):307-315.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  15. Effects of sweet flavorings and nicotine on the appeal and sensory properties of e-cigarettes among young adult vapers: Application of a novel methodology. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Nov 01; 168:176-180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  16. Urinary and plasma oxytocin changes in response to MDMA or intranasal oxytocin administration. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016 12; 74:92-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  17. Asians compared to Whites show increased response to d-amphetamine on select subjective and cardiovascular measures. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2016 May; 144:73-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  18. Oxytocin receptor gene variation predicts subjective responses to MDMA. Soc Neurosci. 2016 12; 11(6):592-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  19. Intimate insight: MDMA changes how people talk about significant others. J Psychopharmacol. 2015 Jun; 29(6):669-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  20. 'Ecstasy' as a social drug: MDMA preferentially affects responses to emotional stimuli with social content. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Aug; 9(8):1076-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  21. Residual effects of intranasal methamphetamine on sleep, mood, and performance. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Apr 01; 94(1-3):258-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  22. Acute physiological and behavioral effects of intranasal methamphetamine in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008 Jul; 33(8):1847-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.