The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Roberto M. Lang to Predictive Value of Tests

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Roberto M. Lang has written about Predictive Value of Tests.
Connection Strength

3.949
  1. Deep learning assisted measurement of echocardiographic left heart parameters: improvement in interobserver variability and workflow efficiency. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Dec; 39(12):2507-2516.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  2. Preservation of Circumferential and Radial Left Ventricular Function as a Mitigating Mechanism for Impaired Longitudinal Strain in Early Cardiac Amyloidosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023 12; 36(12):1290-1301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  3. Artificial intelligence based left ventricular ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain in cardiac amyloidosis. Echocardiography. 2023 03; 40(3):188-195.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  4. Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic features of first and second waves of COVID-19 at a large, tertiary medical center serving a predominantly African American patient population. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Nov; 37(11):3181-3190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  5. Utility of transillumination and transparency renderings in 3D transthoracic imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jan; 38(1):141-147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  6. Quantifying Right Ventricular Fibrosis Burden Using 3D Strain: Can Echo Approximate a Virtual Heart Biopsy? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 07; 14(7):1321-1323.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  7. The Quest to Better Quantitate Tricuspid Regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 07; 13(7):1472-1474.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  8. Measurement errors in serial echocardiographic assessments of aortic valve stenosis severity. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Mar; 36(3):471-479.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  9. Three-dimensional echocardiography investigation of the mechanisms of tricuspid annular dilatation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jan; 36(1):33-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  10. 3-Dimensional Echocardiography: Latest Developments and Future Directions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 12; 11(12):1854-1878.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  11. 3D Morphological Changes in LV and RV During LVAD Ramp Studies. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 02; 11(2 Pt 1):159-169.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  12. LA Strain for Categorization of LV Diastolic Dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 07; 10(7):735-743.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  13. Transthoracic 3D Echocardiographic Left Heart Chamber Quantification Using an Automated Adaptive Analytics Algorithm. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 07; 9(7):769-782.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  14. Screening for Outflow Cannula Malfunction of Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) With the Use of Doppler Echocardiography: New LVAD-Specific Reference Values for Contemporary Devices. J Card Fail. 2016 Oct; 22(10):808-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  15. Simultaneous Longitudinal Strain in All 4 Cardiac Chambers: A Novel Method for Comprehensive Functional Assessment of the Heart. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Mar; 9(3):e003895.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  16. Abnormalities in aortic properties: a potential link between left ventricular diastolic function and ventricular-aortic coupling in sickle cell disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jun; 32(6):965-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  17. Elongation of chordae tendineae as an adaptive process to reduce mitral regurgitation in functional mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 May; 17(5):500-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  18. Three-dimensional echocardiography-based analysis of right ventricular shape in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 May; 17(5):564-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  19. 3D echocardiographic location of implantable device leads and mechanism of associated tricuspid regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Apr; 7(4):337-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  20. Aortic valve anatomy and assessment by transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg. 2013 Dec; 117(6):1286-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  21. Localizing mitral valve perforations with 3D transesophageal echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Mar; 6(3):407-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  22. Noninvasive quantification of left ventricular elastance and ventricular-arterial coupling using three-dimensional echocardiography and arterial tonometry. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011 Nov; 301(5):H1916-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  23. The value of three-dimensional echocardiography derived mitral valve parametric maps and the role of experience in the diagnosis of pathology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Aug; 24(8):860-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  24. A three-dimensional insight into the complexity of flow convergence in mitral regurgitation: adjunctive benefit of anatomic regurgitant orifice area. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011 Sep; 301(3):H1015-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  25. Can real-time three-dimensional echocardiography be used reliably for the assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony? Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Jun-Jul; 102(6-7):469-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  26. Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony: pitfalls in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jul; 2(7):802-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  27. Three-dimensional echocardiography: is it ready for everyday clinical use? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jan; 2(1):114-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  28. Echocardiography in heart failure: applications, utility, and new horizons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jul 31; 50(5):381-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  29. Racial differences in aortic atheroma in patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography for unexplained stroke or transient ischemic attack. Am J Cardiol. 2004 Nov 01; 94(9):1211-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  30. AI Based CMR Assessment of Biventricular Function: Clinical Significance of Intervendor Variability and Measurement Errors. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 03; 15(3):413-427.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  31. Combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and regional left ventricular function by analysis of contrast-enhanced power modulation images. Circulation. 2001 Jul 17; 104(3):352-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  32. Anatomic Description of Tricuspid Apparatus Interference From Implantable Intracardiac Devices. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 02; 15(2):361-365.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  33. Prevalence of newly diagnosed sarcoidosis in patients with ventricular arrhythmias: a cardiac magnetic resonance and 18F-FDG cardiac PET study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Apr; 37(4):1361-1369.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  34. Utilization of Inpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography in Response to the 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines for Syncope. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 03; 14(3):697-698.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  35. Myocardial strain analysis of the right ventricle: comparison of different cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiographic techniques. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 07 23; 22(1):51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  36. Advanced imaging of right ventricular anatomy and function. Heart. 2020 10; 106(19):1469-1476.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  37. Prevalence of mitral annular disjunction in patients with mitral valve prolapse and severe regurgitation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jul; 36(7):1363-1370.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  38. Core Competencies in Echocardiography for Imaging Structural Heart Disease Interventions: An Expert Consensus Statement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 12; 12(12):2560-2570.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  39. Three-dimensional echocardiography in adult patients: comparison between transthoracic and transesophageal reconstructions. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999 Dec; 12(12):1045-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  40. Contrast-enhanced echocardiographic measurement of longitudinal strain: accuracy and its relationship with image quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Mar; 36(3):431-439.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  41. Echocardiographic evaluation of the effects of sacubitril-valsartan on vascular properties in heart failure patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Feb; 36(2):271-278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  42. Myocardial Tissue Characterization With CMR for the Definitive Diagnosis of Infiltrative Cardiomyopathies. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 01; 13(1 Pt 1):156-162.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  43. Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance based evaluation of myocardial strain and relationship with late gadolinium enhancement. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 08 08; 21(1):46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  44. Hemodynamic impact of coronary stenosis using computed tomography: comparison between noninvasive fractional flow reserve and 3D fusion of coronary angiography with stress myocardial perfusion. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Sep; 35(9):1733-1743.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  45. 3D echocardiographic global longitudinal strain can identify patients with mildly-to-moderately reduced ejection fraction at higher cardiovascular risk. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Sep; 35(9):1573-1579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  46. First Clinical Experience With 3-Dimensional Echocardiographic Transillumination Rendering. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 09; 12(9):1868-1871.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  47. Peak left atrial strain as a single measure for the non-invasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jan; 35(1):23-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  48. Echocardiographic Predictors of Hemodynamics in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Devices. J Card Fail. 2018 Sep; 24(9):561-567.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  49. 3-Dimensional Echocardiographic Analysis of the Tricuspid Annulus Provides New Insights Into Tricuspid Valve Geometry and Dynamics. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 03; 12(3):401-412.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  50. 2D and 3D Echocardiography-Derived Indices of Left Ventricular Function and Shape: Relationship With Mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 11; 11(11):1569-1579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  51. Invasive Validation of the Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures Using the 2016 Diastolic Guidelines: Head-to-Head Comparison with the 2009 Guidelines. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018 01; 31(1):79-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  52. Atrial-focused views improve the accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of the left and right atrial volumes: a contribution to the increase in normal values in the guidelines update. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb; 33(2):209-218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  53. Accurate Quantification Methods for Aortic Insufficiency Severity in Patients With LVAD: Role of Diastolic Flow Acceleration and Systolic-to-Diastolic Peak Velocity Ratio of Outflow Cannula. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 06; 9(6):641-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  54. Semi-automated echocardiographic quantification of right ventricular size and function. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Aug; 31(6):1149-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  55. Discordance between echocardiography and MRI in the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity: a prospective multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 24; 65(11):1078-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  56. Three-dimensional left ventricular segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging for patient-specific modelling purposes. Europace. 2014 Nov; 16 Suppl 4:iv96-iv101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  57. Transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of mitral valve morphology to predict outcome after balloon mitral valvotomy. Am J Cardiol. 1994 Apr 01; 73(9):707-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  58. Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Dec 21; 15:108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  59. Sample size and cost analysis for pulmonary arterial hypertension drug trials using various imaging modalities to assess right ventricular size and function end points. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jan; 7(1):115-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  60. Echocardiography and vascular ultrasound: new developments and future directions. Can J Cardiol. 2013 Mar; 29(3):304-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  61. Considerations when measuring myocardial perfusion reserve by cardiovascular magnetic resonance using regadenoson. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Dec 28; 14:89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  62. Quantitative three-dimensional evaluation of myocardial perfusion during regadenoson stress using multidetector computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Jul-Aug; 36(4):443-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  63. Three-dimensional echocardiographic quantitative evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function using analysis of chamber volume and myocardial deformation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Feb; 29(2):285-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  64. Late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary hypertension. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Feb 01; 14:11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  65. Clinical assessment of acute heart failure syndromes: emergency department through the early post-discharge period. Heart. 2011 Oct; 97(19):1607-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  66. Three-dimensional analysis of interventricular septal curvature from cardiac magnetic resonance images for the evaluation of patients with pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jun; 28(5):1073-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  67. Detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities using ultra-low radiation dose regadenoson stress multidetector computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Jul-Aug; 5(4):247-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  68. Serial changes in left ventricular shape following early mitral valve repair. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Sep 15; 106(6):836-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  69. Multimodality comparison of quantitative volumetric analysis of the right ventricle. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jan; 3(1):10-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  70. Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes: multicenter study for validation with magnetic resonance imaging and investigation of sources of error. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Jul; 1(4):413-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  71. The role of imaging in chronic degenerative mitral regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Mar; 1(2):221-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  72. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for rheumatic mitral valve stenosis evaluation: an accurate and novel approach. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jun 02; 43(11):2091-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  73. Unsuspected clinically important findings detected with a small portable ultrasound device in patients admitted to a general medicine service. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Sep; 16(9):901-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  74. Biplane stress echocardiography using a prototype matrix-array transducer. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Sep; 16(9):937-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  75. The use of small personal ultrasound devices by internists without formal training in echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2003 Jun; 4(2):141-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  76. Is there a long-term predictive value of intraoperative low-dose dobutamine echocardiography in patients who have coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass? Anesth Analg. 2002 Sep; 95(3):517-23, table of contents.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.