The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Michael Ujiki to Clinical Competence

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Ujiki has written about Clinical Competence.
Connection Strength

2.944
  1. A 1-day simulation-based boot camp for incoming general surgery residents improves confidence and technical skills. Surgery. 2019 10; 166(4):572-579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.391
  2. Video review program enhances resident training in laparoscopic inguinal hernia: a randomized blinded controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2018 06; 32(6):2847-2851.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  3. Goal setting results in improvement in surgical skills: A randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 2016 10; 160(4):1028-1037.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.318
  4. Simulation training in surgery. Dis Mon. 2011 Dec; 57(12):789-801.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  5. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy standards for fellowship training in peroral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2026 05; 103(5):849-859.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  6. Teaching endoscopic management of gastrointestinal hemorrhage using a modular simulation curriculum. Surgery. 2023 03; 173(3):702-709.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  7. "Into the fire" approach to teaching endoscopic foreign body removal using a modular simulation curriculum. Surg Endosc. 2023 02; 37(2):1412-1420.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  8. Resident performance in simulation module is associated with operating room performance for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2022 12; 36(12):9273-9280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  9. Subjective vs. objective assessment of simulation performance on laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are we evaluating the right things? Surg Endosc. 2022 09; 36(9):6661-6671.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  10. A modular simulation curriculum to teach endoscopic stenting to practicing surgeons: an "Into the fire" approach. Surg Endosc. 2022 09; 36(9):6859-6867.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  11. Long-term retention after structured curriculum on attainment of critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for surgeons. Surgery. 2022 03; 171(3):577-583.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  12. Teaching EndoFLIP Impedance Planimetry to Practicing Endoscopists: An "Into the Fire" Approach to Simulation. Surg Innov. 2022 Apr; 29(2):241-248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  13. Teaching peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP) to practicing endoscopists: An "into-the-fire" approach to simulation. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):502-507.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  14. Predictors of chronic pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):586-594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  15. Improving attainment of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2020 09; 34(9):4115-4123.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  16. Passing the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) exam: linking specialty choice and attitudes about endoscopic surgery to success. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan; 32(1):225-228.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  17. Evaluation of crowd-sourced assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec; 31(12):5094-5100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  18. A Comparative Assessment of Novel Mini-Laparoscopic Tools. Surg Innov. 2017 Feb; 24(1):35-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  19. Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery: creation and validation of the hands-on test. Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar; 28(3):704-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  20. Establishing standards of practice for transoral outlet reduction: an expert consensus using a modified Delphi method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2026 04; 103(4):780-785.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  21. Moving skills training closer to application: In-rotation skills curriculum is feasible and effective. Am J Surg. 2018 Feb; 215(2):272-276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.