The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Michael Ujiki to Laparoscopy

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Ujiki has written about Laparoscopy.
Michael Ujiki
Connection Strength
18.393
Laparoscopy
  1. Comparable improvement and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: single-center study. Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct; 38(10):5914-5921.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.582
  2. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with obesity results in comparable outcomes. Surgery. 2024 Mar; 175(3):587-591.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.554
  3. The Laparoscopy in Biliary Exploration Research and Training Initiative (LIBERTI) trial: simulator-based training for laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb; 38(2):931-941.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.548
  4. Target distensibility index on impedance planimetry during fundoplication by choice of wrap and choice of bougie. Surg Endosc. 2023 11; 37(11):8670-8681.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.538
  5. A 13-year experience with biologic and biosynthetic absorbable mesh reinforced laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2023 09; 37(9):7271-7279.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.536
  6. Patient-reported outcomes in 645 patients after laparoscopic fundoplication up to 10 years. Surgery. 2023 03; 173(3):710-717.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.511
  7. A Tailored Approach to Laparoscopic Fundoplication: Outcomes in Patients with Esophageal Dysmotility. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 12; 26(12):2426-2433.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.510
  8. Outcomes after anti-reflux procedures: Nissen, Toupet, magnetic sphincter augmentation or anti-reflux mucosectomy? Surg Endosc. 2023 05; 37(5):3944-3951.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.505
  9. Impedance Planimetry (Endoflip) and Ideal Distensibility Ranges for Optimal Outcomes after Nissen and Toupet Fundoplication. J Am Coll Surg. 2022 09 01; 235(3):420-429.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.504
  10. Resident performance in simulation module is associated with operating room performance for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2022 12; 36(12):9273-9280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.490
  11. Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) after magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX®) compared to fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct; 36(10):7709-7716.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.487
  12. Patient-reported bowel and bladder function is not adversely impacted by bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2022 09; 36(9):6896-6902.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.486
  13. Subjective vs. objective assessment of simulation performance on laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are we evaluating the right things? Surg Endosc. 2022 09; 36(9):6661-6671.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.486
  14. Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) reveals changes in gastroesophageal junction compliance during fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2022 09; 36(9):6801-6808.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.484
  15. Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) measurements persist long term after anti-reflux surgery. Surgery. 2022 03; 171(3):628-634.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.480
  16. Impedance Planimetry (Endoflip™) Shows That Length of Narrowing After Fundoplication Does Not Impact Dysphagia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 01; 26(1):21-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.476
  17. Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) results in improved recovery and similar reflux quality of life outcomes compared to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2021 12; 35(12):7174-7182.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.448
  18. Comparing cost and outcomes between peroral endoscopic myotomy and laparoscopic heller myotomy. Am J Surg. 2021 07; 222(1):208-213.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.446
  19. Predictors of chronic pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):586-594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  20. Experience-based expert consensus on the intra-operative usage of the Endoflip impedance planimetry system. Surg Endosc. 2021 06; 35(6):2731-2742.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.434
  21. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy: Evaluating safety, efficacy, and efficiency. Surgery. 2019 10; 166(4):607-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.408
  22. Initial Experience with Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy, with Description and Video of Technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 08; 23(8):1706-1710.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.402
  23. Effects of dexamethasone on postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2019 09; 33(9):3008-3013.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.388
  24. Patient-Centered Outcomes after Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 07; 227(1):106-114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.369
  25. Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision is more effective than medical management alone to address weight regain after RYGB. Surg Endosc. 2018 03; 32(3):1564-1571.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.368
  26. Video review program enhances resident training in laparoscopic inguinal hernia: a randomized blinded controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2018 06; 32(6):2847-2851.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.365
  27. Quality of life after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of an asymptomatic inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb; 32(2):813-819.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.356
  28. Outcomes in patients with over 1-year follow-up after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc. 2017 04; 31(4):1550-1557.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.339
  29. A Comparative Assessment of Novel Mini-Laparoscopic Tools. Surg Innov. 2017 Feb; 24(1):35-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.335
  30. Long-term patterns and predictors of pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a patient-centered analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017 05; 31(5):2109-2121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.334
  31. Creation of a Jejunal Pouch During Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Esophagojejunostomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jan; 24(1):184-186.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.334
  32. Goal setting results in improvement in surgical skills: A randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 2016 10; 160(4):1028-1037.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.333
  33. Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Groin Hernia Repair and Quality of Life at 2-Year Follow-Up. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 07; 223(1):153-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.325
  34. Elderly and octogenarian cohort: Comparable outcomes with nonelderly cohort after open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. Surgery. 2015 Oct; 158(4):1137-43; discussion 1143-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.311
  35. Modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair decreases recurrence rates of parastomal hernia. Surgery. 2015 Oct; 158(4):954-9; discussion 959-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.309
  36. Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 28; 21(28):8670-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.309
  37. Patient-centered outcomes following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep; 29(9):2512-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.296
  38. Surgical resident evaluations of portable laparoscopic box trainers incorporated into a simulation-based minimally invasive surgery curriculum. Surg Innov. 2015 Feb; 22(1):83-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.286
  39. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: A short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery. 2013 Oct; 154(4):893-7; discussion 897-900.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.273
  40. Laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique results in superior recurrence rate. Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec; 26(12):3430-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.249
  41. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using radiofrequency energy. Am J Surg. 2010 Mar; 199(3):401-4; discussion 404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.213
  42. Minimally invasive approaches to inguinal hernia repair. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2010; 20(2):105-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.210
  43. One hundred consecutive laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs. Am J Surg. 2004 Nov; 188(5):593-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  44. Laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair are safe and effective after prior pelvic or low abdominal surgery. Am J Surg. 2023 02; 225(2):252-257.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  45. Short-term quality of life comparison of laparoscopic, open, and robotic incisional hernia repairs. Surg Endosc. 2021 06; 35(6):2781-2788.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  46. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal approaches are equally effective for spigelian hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2021 04; 35(4):1827-1833.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  47. A 1-day simulation-based boot camp for incoming general surgery residents improves confidence and technical skills. Surgery. 2019 10; 166(4):572-579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  48. An analysis of results in a single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing non-fixating versus self-fixating mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2019 08; 33(8):2670-2679.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  49. Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using rectus sheath tunnel and selective omentopexy significantly reduces catheter dysfunction and increases peritoneal dialysis longevity. Surgery. 2016 10; 160(4):924-935.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  50. A Model of Cost Reduction and Standardization: Improved Cost Savings While Maintaining the Quality of Care. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Nov; 58(11):1104-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  51. Educating surgeons may allow for reduced intraoperative costs for inguinal herniorrhaphy. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jun; 220(6):1107-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  52. Laparoscopy has a superior diagnostic yield than percutaneous image-guided biopsy for suspected intra-abdominal lymphoma. Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep; 29(9):2496-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  53. Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach prior to esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jul; 26(5):479-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  54. Surgical management of breast cancer liver metastases. HPB (Oxford). 2011 Apr; 13(4):272-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  55. Outcome after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of technically resectable colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jul; 18(7):1947-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  56. Adding days spent in readmission to the initial postoperative length of stay limits the perceived benefit of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy when compared with open distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg. 2011 Mar; 201(3):295-9; discussion 299-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  57. A prospective single institution comparison of peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surgery. 2009 Oct; 146(4):635-43; discussion 643-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  58. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg. 2004 Apr; 187(4):464-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  59. Biomesh placement in laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias. Surg Innov. 2008 Sep; 15(3):184-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.