The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Manyuan Long to Gene Duplication

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Manyuan Long has written about Gene Duplication.
Manyuan Long
Connection Strength
5.094
Gene Duplication
  1. Rapid Evolution of Gained Essential Developmental Functions of a Young Gene via Interactions with Other Essential Genes. Mol Biol Evol. 2019 10 01; 36(10):2212-2226.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.583
  2. Segmental dataset and whole body expression data do not support the hypothesis that non-random movement is an intrinsic property of Drosophila retrogenes. BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Sep 05; 12:169.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.357
  3. Drosophila duplication hotspots are associated with late-replicating regions of the genome. PLoS Genet. 2011 Nov; 7(11):e1002340.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.337
  4. Deficiency of X-linked inverted duplicates with male-biased expression and the underlying evolutionary mechanisms in the Drosophila genome. Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Oct; 28(10):2823-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.326
  5. A cautionary note for retrocopy identification: DNA-based duplication of intron-containing genes significantly contributes to the origination of single exon genes. Bioinformatics. 2011 Jul 01; 27(13):1749-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.326
  6. RNA-based gene duplication: mechanistic and evolutionary insights. Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Jan; 10(1):19-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.277
  7. Recurrent tandem gene duplication gave rise to functionally divergent genes in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Jul; 25(7):1451-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.263
  8. Functional innovation through new genes as a general evolutionary process. Nat Genet. 2025 Feb; 57(2):295-309.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  9. The three-dimensional genome drives the evolution of asymmetric gene duplicates via enhancer capture-divergence. Sci Adv. 2024 12 20; 10(51):eadn6625.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  10. Excess of amino acid substitutions relative to polymorphism between X-linked duplications in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Feb; 22(2):273-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.207
  11. The Rapid Evolution of De Novo Proteins in Structure and Complex. Genome Biol Evol. 2024 06 04; 16(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  12. Duplication-degeneration as a mechanism of gene fission and the origin of new genes in Drosophila species. Nat Genet. 2004 May; 36(5):523-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  13. Rapid divergence of gene duplicates on the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jun; 19(6):918-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  14. Species-specific partial gene duplication in Arabidopsis thaliana evolved novel phenotypic effects on morphological traits under strong positive selection. Plant Cell. 2022 02 03; 34(2):802-817.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  15. Genomic analyses of new genes and their phenotypic effects reveal rapid evolution of essential functions in Drosophila development. PLoS Genet. 2021 07; 17(7):e1009654.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  16. Topological evolution of coexpression networks by new gene integration maintains the hierarchical and modular structures in human ancestors. Sci China Life Sci. 2019 Apr; 62(4):594-608.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  17. LTR-mediated retroposition as a mechanism of RNA-based duplication in metazoans. Genome Res. 2016 12; 26(12):1663-1675.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  18. Evolution of gene structural complexity: an alternative-splicing-based model accounts for intron-containing retrogenes. Plant Physiol. 2014 May; 165(1):412-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  19. New gene evolution: little did we know. Annu Rev Genet. 2013; 47:307-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  20. Roles of young serine-endopeptidase genes in survival and reproduction revealed rapid evolution of phenotypic effects at adult stages. Fly (Austin). 2011 Oct-Dec; 5(4):345-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  21. New genes in Drosophila quickly become essential. Science. 2010 Dec 17; 330(6011):1682-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  22. The rapid generation of chimerical genes expanding protein diversity in zebrafish. BMC Genomics. 2010 Nov 24; 11:657.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  23. Mutational bias shaping fly copy number variation: implications for genome evolution. Trends Genet. 2010 Jun; 26(6):243-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  24. Natural selection shapes genome-wide patterns of copy-number polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2008 Jun 20; 320(5883):1629-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  25. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature. 2004 Dec 09; 432(7018):695-716.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  26. Expansion of genome coding regions by acquisition of new genes. Genetica. 2002 May; 115(1):65-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  27. Evolution of novel genes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001 Dec; 11(6):673-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  28. Gene duplication and evolution. Science. 2001 Aug 31; 293(5535):1551.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  29. High occurrence of functional new chimeric genes in survey of rice chromosome 3 short arm genome sequences. Genome Biol Evol. 2013; 5(5):1038-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  30. The subtelomere of Oryza sativa chromosome 3 short arm as a hot bed of new gene origination in rice. Mol Plant. 2008 Sep; 1(5):839-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  31. Repetitive element-mediated recombination as a mechanism for new gene origination in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2008 Jan; 4(1):e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  32. Intron presence-absence polymorphism in Drosophila driven by positive Darwinian selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 11; 99(12):8121-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.