Connection
Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Margaret Wardle and Harriet De Wit.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
|
7.747 |
|
|
|
-
Wardle MC, Pabon E, Webber HE, de Wit H. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol reduces willingness to exert effort in women. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 May; 239(5):1487-1497.
Score: 0.963
-
Wardle MC, Bershad AK, de Wit H. Naltrexone alters the processing of social and emotional stimuli in healthy adults. Soc Neurosci. 2016 12; 11(6):579-91.
Score: 0.634
-
Wardle MC, Marcus BA, de Wit H. A Preliminary Investigation of Individual Differences in Subjective Responses to D-Amphetamine, Alcohol, and Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Using a Within-Subjects Randomized Trial. PLoS One. 2015; 10(10):e0140501.
Score: 0.624
-
Wardle MC, de Wit H. MDMA alters emotional processing and facilitates positive social interaction. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Oct; 231(21):4219-29.
Score: 0.561
-
Wardle MC, Kirkpatrick MG, de Wit H. 'Ecstasy' as a social drug: MDMA preferentially affects responses to emotional stimuli with social content. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Aug; 9(8):1076-81.
Score: 0.559
-
Wardle MC, Hart AB, Palmer AA, de Wit H. Does COMT genotype influence the effects of d-amphetamine on executive functioning? Genes Brain Behav. 2013 Feb; 12(1):13-20.
Score: 0.513
-
Wardle MC, Treadway MT, de Wit H. Caffeine increases psychomotor performance on the effort expenditure for rewards task. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012 Oct; 102(4):526-31.
Score: 0.495
-
Wardle MC, Treadway MT, Mayo LM, Zald DH, de Wit H. Amping up effort: effects of d-amphetamine on human effort-based decision-making. J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 16; 31(46):16597-602.
Score: 0.475
-
Wardle MC, de Wit H. Effects of amphetamine on reactivity to emotional stimuli. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Mar; 220(1):143-53.
Score: 0.470
-
Wardle MC, Yang A, de Wit H. Effect of d-amphetamine on post-error slowing in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Mar; 220(1):109-15.
Score: 0.468
-
Wardle M, Cederbaum K, de Wit H. Quantifying talk: developing reliable measures of verbal productivity. Behav Res Methods. 2011 Mar; 43(1):168-78.
Score: 0.452
-
Wardle MC, Munafò MR, de Wit H. Effect of social stress during acute nicotine abstinence. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Nov; 218(1):39-48.
Score: 0.448
-
Webber HE, Lopez-Gamundi P, Stamatovich SN, de Wit H, Wardle MC. Using pharmacological manipulations to study the role of dopamine in human reward functioning: A review of studies in healthy adults. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 01; 120:123-158.
Score: 0.221
-
Bershad AK, Weafer JJ, Kirkpatrick MG, Wardle MC, Miller MA, de Wit H. Oxytocin receptor gene variation predicts subjective responses to MDMA. Soc Neurosci. 2016 12; 11(6):592-9.
Score: 0.159
-
Wardle MC, Fitzgerald DA, Angstadt M, Rabinak CA, de Wit H, Phan KL. Effects of oxycodone on brain responses to emotional images. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Nov; 231(22):4403-15.
Score: 0.141
-
Kirkpatrick MG, Lee R, Wardle MC, Jacob S, de Wit H. Effects of MDMA and Intranasal oxytocin on social and emotional processing. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Jun; 39(7):1654-63.
Score: 0.138
-
Frye CG, Wardle MC, Norman GJ, de Wit H. MDMA decreases the effects of simulated social rejection. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2014 Feb; 117:1-6.
Score: 0.137
-
Wardle MC, de Wit H, Penton-Voak I, Lewis G, Munafò MR. Lack of association between COMT and working memory in a population-based cohort of healthy young adults. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Jun; 38(7):1253-63.
Score: 0.129
-
Conrad M, Wardle M, King A, de Wit H. Relationship of self-reported and acute stress to smoking in emerging adult smokers. J Clin Psychol. 2013 Jul; 69(7):710-7.
Score: 0.128
-
Hart AB, Engelhardt BE, Wardle MC, Sokoloff G, Stephens M, de Wit H, Palmer AA. Genome-wide association study of d-amphetamine response in healthy volunteers identifies putative associations, including cadherin 13 (CDH13). PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e42646.
Score: 0.031
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|