The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Peter H. O'Donnell and Rita Nanda.
Connection Strength

1.285
  1. Implementation of pharmacogenomic testing in oncology care (PhOCus): study protocol of a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020; 12:1758835920974118.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  2. Clinical evaluation of germline polymorphisms associated with capecitabine toxicity in breast cancer: TBCRC-015. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun; 181(3):623-633.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  3. Patient-provider communications about pharmacogenomic results increase patient recall of medication changes. Pharmacogenomics J. 2019 12; 19(6):528-537.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  4. Assessment of provider-perceived barriers to clinical use of pharmacogenomics during participation in an institutional implementation study. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2019 02; 29(2):31-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  5. Analyzing the clinical actionability of germline pharmacogenomic findings in oncology. Cancer. 2018 07 15; 124(14):3052-3065.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  6. Pharmacogenomics-Based Point-of-Care Clinical Decision Support Significantly Alters Drug Prescribing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Nov; 102(5):859-869.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  7. Patient Perceptions of Care as Influenced by a Large Institutional Pharmacogenomic Implementation Program. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 07; 102(1):106-114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  8. Phase I Study of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy plus Nivolumab and Urelumab or Cabiralizumab in Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 10 15; 27(20):5510-5518.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  9. Utility of patient-derived lymphoblastoid cell lines as an ex vivo capecitabine sensitivity prediction model for breast cancer patients. Oncotarget. 2016 Jun 21; 7(25):38359-38366.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.