The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by J. Thistlethwaite and Lainie Ross.
Connection Strength

8.074
  1. Gender and race/ethnicity differences in living kidney donor demographics: Preference or disparity? Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2021 07; 35(3):100614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.797
  2. Living Donation by Individuals with Life-Limiting Conditions. J Law Med Ethics. 2019 03; 47(1):112-122.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.689
  3. Developing an ethics framework for living donor transplantation. J Med Ethics. 2018 12; 44(12):843-850.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.658
  4. Introducing Genetic Tests With Uncertain Implications in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: ApoL1 as a Case Study. Prog Transplant. 2016 Sep; 26(3):203-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.571
  5. The 1966 Ciba Symposium on Transplantation Ethics: 50 Years Later. Transplantation. 2016 Jun; 100(6):1191-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.569
  6. Outcomes after kidney donation. JAMA. 2014 Jul 02; 312(1):94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.498
  7. Age should not be considered in the allocation of deceased donor kidneys. Semin Dial. 2012 Nov-Dec; 25(6):675-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.443
  8. Equal Opportunity Supplemented by Fair Innings: equity and efficiency in allocating deceased donor kidneys. Am J Transplant. 2012 Aug; 12(8):2115-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.433
  9. Different standards are not double standards: all elective surgical patients are not alike. J Clin Ethics. 2012; 23(2):118-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.419
  10. Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med. 2009 May 28; 360(22):2371; author reply 2372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.350
  11. Potential inefficiency of a proposed efficiency model for kidney allocation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Apr; 51(4):545-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.323
  12. We need a registry of living kidney donors. Hastings Cent Rep. 2007 Nov-Dec; 37(6):1 p following 48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.314
  13. Shared decision making in deceased-donor transplantation. Lancet. 2006 Jul 22; 368(9532):333-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.287
  14. Should all living donors be treated equally? Transplantation. 2002 Aug 15; 74(3):418-21; discussion 421-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  15. Ethical Analysis and Policy Recommendations Regarding Domino Liver Transplantation. Transplantation. 2018 05; 102(5):803-808.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  16. Kidney Donor Profile Index Does Not Accurately Predict the Graft Survival of Pediatric Deceased Donor Kidneys. Transplantation. 2016 Nov; 100(11):2471-2478.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  17. Attitudes of Lay Stakeholders and Transplant Professionals About Disclosure to Living Kidney Donors in Exchanges and Chains. Prog Transplant. 2016 Dec; 26(4):299-308.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  18. To tell or not to tell: attitudes of transplant surgeons and transplant nephrologists regarding the disclosure of recipient information to living kidney donors. Clin Transplant. 2015 Dec; 29(12):1203-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  19. Disclosing Health and Health Behavior Information between Living Donors and Their Recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Sep 04; 10(9):1609-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  20. Racial disparities in reaching the renal transplant waitlist: is geography as important as race? Clin Transplant. 2015 Jun; 29(6):531-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  21. When the living and the deceased cannot agree on organ donation: a survey of US organ procurement organizations (OPOs). Am J Transplant. 2014 Jan; 14(1):172-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  22. Risk, prognosis, and unintended consequences in kidney allocation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 07; 364(14):1285-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  23. How different conceptions of risk are used in the organ market debate. Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr; 10(4):931-937.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  24. Minors as living solid-organ donors. Pediatrics. 2008 Aug; 122(2):454-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  25. An empirical investigation of physicians' attitudes toward intrasibling kidney donation by minor twins. Transplantation. 2008 May 15; 85(9):1235-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  26. Attitudes of minority patients with end-stage renal disease regarding ABO-incompatible list-paired exchanges. Am J Transplant. 2006 Jan; 6(1):83-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  27. Ethics of a paired-kidney-exchange program. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jun 12; 336(24):1752-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  28. Age and equity in liver transplantation: An organ allocation model. Liver Transpl. 2015 Oct; 21(10):1241-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  29. A K-nearest neighbors survival probability prediction method. Stat Med. 2013 May 30; 32(12):2062-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.