The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Siri Atma W. Greeley and Rochelle Naylor.
Connection Strength

2.422
  1. Insight on Diagnosis and Treatment From Over a Decade of Research Through the University of Chicago Monogenic Diabetes Registry. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2021 Nov; 2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.209
  2. The Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas. Pediatr Ann. 2021 Jul; 50(7):e304-e307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  3. Using a Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas: Perspectives from Patients and Diabetes Providers. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 09; 14(5):860-867.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  4. GCK-MODY in the US Monogenic Diabetes Registry: Description of 27 unpublished variants. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 May; 151:231-236.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  5. Management and pregnancy outcomes of women with GCK-MODY enrolled in the US Monogenic Diabetes Registry. Acta Diabetol. 2019 Apr; 56(4):405-411.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  6. Hypoglycemia in sulfonylurea-treated KCNJ11-neonatal diabetes: Mild-moderate symptomatic episodes occur infrequently but none involving unconsciousness or seizures. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 05; 19(3):393-397.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  7. Diabetes Presentation in Infancy: High Risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis. Diabetes Care. 2017 10; 40(10):e147-e148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  8. Patients with KCNJ11-related diabetes frequently have neuropsychological impairments compared with sibling controls. Diabet Med. 2016 10; 33(10):1380-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  9. Role of noninsulin therapies alone or in combination in chromosome 6q24-related transient neonatal diabetes: sulfonylurea improves but does not always normalize insulin secretion. Diabetes Care. 2015 Jun; 38(6):e86-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  10. Sulfonylurea treatment before genetic testing in neonatal diabetes: pros and cons. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Dec; 99(12):E2709-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  11. Cost-effectiveness of MODY genetic testing: translating genomic advances into practical health applications. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(1):202-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  12. Neonatal diabetes: an expanding list of genes allows for improved diagnosis and treatment. Curr Diab Rep. 2011 Dec; 11(6):519-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  13. Creation of the Web-based University of Chicago Monogenic Diabetes Registry: using technology to facilitate longitudinal study of rare subtypes of diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Jul 01; 5(4):879-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  14. Genetics and pathophysiology of neonatal diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2011 Jun 05; 2(3):158-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  15. Neonatal diabetes mellitus: a model for personalized medicine. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Aug; 21(8):464-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  16. Second international consensus report on gaps and opportunities for the clinical translation of precision diabetes medicine. Nat Med. 2023 Oct; 29(10):2438-2457.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  17. Systematic Review of Treatment of Beta-Cell Monogenic Diabetes. medRxiv. 2023 Sep 22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  18. Iatrogenic Hyperinsulinemia, Not Hyperglycemia, Drives Insulin Resistance in Type 1 Diabetes as Revealed by Comparison With GCK-MODY (MODY2). Diabetes. 2019 08; 68(8):1565-1576.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  19. GCK-MODY in the US National Monogenic Diabetes Registry: frequently misdiagnosed and unnecessarily treated. Acta Diabetol. 2016 Oct; 53(5):703-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  20. Age at the time of sulfonylurea initiation influences treatment outcomes in KCNJ11-related neonatal diabetes. Diabetologia. 2015 Jul; 58(7):1430-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.