The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Wendy Levinson to Canada

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Wendy Levinson has written about Canada.
Connection Strength

1.316
  1. Comment on: Measuring the impacts of the Using Antibiotics Wisely campaign on Canadian community utilization of oral antibiotics for respiratory tract infections: a time-series analysis from 2015 to 2019. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 03 31; 77(4):1214-1215.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  2. Reframing Resource Stewardship and Sustainability as Professionalism: What Can Efforts for a Net-Zero Health System Learn from Choosing Wisely Campaigns? Healthc Pap. 2020 10; 19(3):35-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  3. Electrocardiograms in Low-Risk Patients Undergoing an Annual Health Examination. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 09 01; 177(9):1326-1333.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  4. Engaging physicians and patients in conversations about unnecessary tests and procedures: Choosing Wisely Canada. CMAJ. 2014 Mar 18; 186(5):325-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  5. A comprehensive assessment of health care utilization among homeless adults under a system of universal health insurance. Am J Public Health. 2013 Dec; 103 Suppl 2:S294-301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  6. Patient-physician communication: it's about time. JAMA. 2011 May 04; 305(17):1802-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  7. Shared medical regulation in a time of increasing calls for accountability and transparency: comparison of recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. JAMA. 2009 Nov 11; 302(18):2008-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  8. Revalidation of physicians in Canada: are we passing the test? CMAJ. 2008 Nov 04; 179(10):979-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  9. Disclosing medical errors to patients: a status report in 2007. CMAJ. 2007 Jul 31; 177(3):265-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  10. US and Canadian physicians' attitudes and experiences regarding disclosing errors to patients. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Aug 14-28; 166(15):1605-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  11. Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2022 02 28; 194(8):E279-E296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  12. Measuring the frequency and variation of unnecessary care across Canada. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 03; 19(1):446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  13. Inappropriateness of health care in Canada: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2019 02 11; 8(1):50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  14. Disclosing Adverse Events to Patients: International Norms and Trends. J Patient Saf. 2017 03; 13(1):43-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  15. A survey of primary care patients' readiness to engage in the de-adoption practices recommended by Choosing Wisely Canada. BMC Res Notes. 2016 Jun 10; 9:301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  16. Recognizing Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Activities in Academic Promotion in Departments of Medicine: Innovative Language in Promotion Criteria. Am J Med. 2016 May; 129(5):540-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  17. Sustaining quality improvement and patient safety training in graduate medical education: lessons from social theory. Acad Med. 2013 Aug; 88(8):1149-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  18. US physician practices versus Canadians: spending nearly four times as much money interacting with payers. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Aug; 30(8):1443-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  19. A new way of relating: perceptions associated with a team-based error disclosure simulation intervention. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct; 19 Suppl 3:i57-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  20. The emotional impact of medical errors on practicing physicians in the United States and Canada. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Aug; 33(8):467-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.