The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Blase Polite to Medical Oncology

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Blase Polite has written about Medical Oncology.
Connection Strength

4.937
  1. Oncology Care Model: A Herculean Effort With Fixable Fatal Flaws. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 04; 17(4):173-176.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.513
  2. Opaque Results of Federal Price Transparency Rules and State-Based Alternatives. J Oncol Pract. 2019 09; 15(9):463-464.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.463
  3. State of Cancer Care in America: Reflections on an Inaugural Year. J Oncol Pract. 2019 04; 15(4):163-165.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.450
  4. Impact on Oncology Practices of Including Drug Costs in Bundled Payments. J Oncol Pract. 2018 05; 14(5):e259-e268.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.422
  5. Charting the Future of Cancer Health Disparities Research: A Position Statement From the American Association for Cancer Research, the American Cancer Society, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the National Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol. 2017 09 10; 35(26):3075-3082.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.402
  6. Charting the future of cancer health disparities research: A position statement from the American Association for Cancer Research, the American Cancer Society, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the National Cancer Institute. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 09; 67(5):353-361.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.402
  7. Implementation of Advance Care Planning in Oncology: A Review of the Literature. J Oncol Pract. 2017 10; 13(10):657-662.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.398
  8. Oncology Pathways-Preventing a Good Idea From Going Bad. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Mar; 2(3):297-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.365
  9. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement on medicaid reform. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 20; 32(36):4162-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.334
  10. Oncology Medical Homes: ASCO-Community Oncology Alliance Standards. JCO Oncol Pract. 2026 Mar; 22(3):365-374.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  11. Practice Considerations for Participation in the Enhancing Oncology Model. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 11; 18(11):737-741.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  12. Oncology alternative payment models: lessons from commercial insurance. Am J Manag Care. 2022 03; 28(3):98-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  13. Oncology Medical Home: ASCO and COA Standards. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 08; 17(8):475-492.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  14. The State of Oncology Practice in America, 2018: Results of the ASCO Practice Census Survey. J Oncol Pract. 2018 07; 14(7):e412-e420.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  15. A New Look at the State of Cancer Care in America. J Oncol Pract. 2018 07; 14(7):397-399.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  16. Charting the Future of Cancer Health Disparities Research: A Position Statement from the American Association for Cancer Research, the American Cancer Society, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the National Cancer Institute. Cancer Res. 2017 09 01; 77(17):4548-4555.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  17. Updating the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework: Revisions and Reflections in Response to Comments Received. J Clin Oncol. 2016 08 20; 34(24):2925-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  18. Reform of the Buy-and-Bill System for Outpatient Chemotherapy Care Is Inevitable: Perspectives from an Economist, a Realpolitik, and an Oncologist. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015; e75-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  19. Qualitative analysis of practicing oncologists' attitudes and experiences regarding collection of patient-reported outcomes. J Oncol Pract. 2013 Nov; 9(6):e290-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  20. Association of Diet Quality With Survival Among People With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Cancer and Leukemia B and Southwest Oncology Group 80405 Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 10 01; 3(10):e2023500.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.