The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Debra Stulberg to Female

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Debra Stulberg has written about Female.
Debra Stulberg
Connection Strength
1.288
Female
  1. Assessing Change in Medical Management of Early Pregnancy Loss before and after Implementation of a Learning Collaborative for Initiation of Mifepristone Use. Matern Child Health J. 2025 Sep; 29(9):1318-1325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  2. Rapid Innovation and Adaptation in Contraceptive Care Using Telemedicine: Evaluating Impact and Sustainability at Planned Parenthood of Illinois. Telemed J E Health. 2025 Jun; 31(6):737-746.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  3. Primary Care's Role in Prescribing Mail-Order Mifepristone. JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Aug 01; 184(8):859-860.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  4. Racial and ethnic disparities in short interval pregnancy following delivery in Catholic vs non-Catholic hospitals among California Medicaid enrollees. Contraception. 2024 03; 131:110308.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  5. Reproductive care in community health centers: Multi-method evaluation of the Illinois Contraceptive Access Now (ICAN!) demonstration program. Contraception. 2024 01; 129:110305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  6. ExPAND Mifepristone: Medical Management of Miscarriage and Abortion in FQHCs. Ann Fam Med. 2023 Sep-Oct; 21(5):468.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  7. Preconception, Interconception, and reproductive health screening tools: A systematic review. Health Serv Res. 2023 04; 58(2):458-488.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  8. "This has definitely opened the doors": Provider perceptions of patient experiences with telemedicine for contraception in Illinois. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022 09; 54(3):80-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  9. Short-interval pregnancy in the Illinois Medicaid population following delivery in Catholic vs non-Catholic hospitals. Contraception. 2022 08; 112:105-110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  10. Preconception care and severe maternal morbidity in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 03; 4(2):100549.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  11. Prevalence and experiences of Wisconsin women turned away from Catholic settings without receiving reproductive care. Contraception. 2021 10; 104(4):377-382.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  12. Expanding access to medication abortion through pharmacy dispensing of mifepristone: Primary care perspectives from Illinois. Contraception. 2021 07; 104(1):98-103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  13. Denial of tubal ligation in religious hospitals: Consumer attitudes when insurance limits hospital choice. Contraception. 2021 08; 104(2):194-201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  14. Lessons learned: Illinois providers' perspectives on implementation of Medicaid coverage for abortion. Contraception. 2021 06; 103(6):414-419.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  15. Patient perceptions of healthcare differences within Catholic facilities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 01; 224(1):110-111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  16. Perceptions of a Spanish language Reproductive Health Self-assessment Tool Among Spanish-Speaking Women at a Federally Qualified Health Center. J Immigr Minor Health. 2020 Aug; 22(4):691-700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  17. "My Hands Are Tied": Abortion Restrictions and Providers' Experiences in Religious and Nonreligious Health Care Systems. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 07; 52(2):107-115.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  18. One Key Question® and the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale: A comparison of two approaches to asking about pregnancy preferences. Contraception. 2020 04; 101(4):231-236.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  19. "Am I Going to Be in Trouble for What I'm Doing?": Providing Contraceptive Care in Religious Health Care Systems. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019 12; 51(4):193-199.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  20. Choosing a hospital for obstetric, gynecologic, or reproductive healthcare: what matters most to patients? Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 02; 2(1):100067.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  21. Women's Expectation of Receiving Reproductive Health Care at Catholic and Non-Catholic Hospitals. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019 09; 51(3):135-142.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  22. Increase in Contraceptive Counseling by Primary Care Clinicians After Implementation of One Key Question® at an Urban Community Health Center. Matern Child Health J. 2019 Aug; 23(8):996-1002.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  23. Family planning service provision in Illinois religious hospitals: Racial/ethnic variation in access to non-religious hospitals for publicly insured women. Contraception. 2019 10; 100(4):296-298.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  24. Do women know whether their hospital is Catholic? Results from a national survey. Contraception. 2018 12; 98(6):498-503.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  25. Religious hospital policies on reproductive care: what do patients want to know? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 02; 218(2):251.e1-251.e9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  26. Pre-pregnancy and Early Prenatal Care are Associated with Lower Risk of Ectopic Pregnancy Complications in the Medicaid Population: 2004-08. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017 01; 31(1):4-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  27. Referrals for Services Prohibited In Catholic Health Care Facilities. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 09; 48(3):111-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  28. Fragmentation of Care in Ectopic Pregnancy. Matern Child Health J. 2016 May; 20(5):955-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  29. The Research Consortium on Religious Healthcare Institutions: studying the impact of religious restrictions on women's reproductive health. Contraception. 2016 07; 94(1):6-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  30. Ectopic pregnancy morbidity and mortality in low-income women, 2004-2008. Hum Reprod. 2016 Mar; 31(3):666-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  31. Trends in contraceptive and preconception care in United States ambulatory practices. Fam Med. 2015 Apr; 47(4):264-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  32. Ectopic pregnancy rates and racial disparities in the Medicaid population, 2004-2008. Fertil Steril. 2014 Dec; 102(6):1671-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  33. Probiotics for colic? A PURL update. J Fam Pract. 2014 Oct; 63(10):602.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  34. Tubal ligation in Catholic hospitals: a qualitative study of ob-gyns' experiences. Contraception. 2014 Oct; 90(4):422-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  35. Ectopic pregnancy rates in a non-Medicaid population are lower than previously reported. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec; 209(6):592.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  36. Ectopic pregnancy rates in the Medicaid population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr; 208(4):274.e1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  37. Obstetrician-gynecologists, religious institutions, and conflicts regarding patient-care policies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul; 207(1):73.e1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  38. Abortion provision among practicing obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep; 118(3):609-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  39. Socioeconomic disparities in ectopic pregnancy: predictors of adverse outcomes from Illinois hospital-based care, 2000-2006. Matern Child Health J. 2011 Feb; 15(2):234-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  40. Religious hospitals and primary care physicians: conflicts over policies for patient care. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jul; 25(7):725-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  41. Exploring Consumer Preferences for Pharmacy Provision of Mifepristone in the Human-centered Design Discovery Phase. Womens Health Issues. 2024 Nov-Dec; 34(6):580-588.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  42. Demand for abortion training and technical assistance in primary care: Unmet need and programmatic interventions. Contraception. 2024 Aug; 136:110487.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  43. Patient experiences using public and private insurance coverage for abortion in Illinois: Implementation successes and remaining gaps. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 09; 56(3):269-281.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  44. Pharmacists' experiences dispensing misoprostol and readiness to dispense mifepristone. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2024 Jan-Feb; 64(1):245-252.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  45. Mifepristone implementation in primary care: Clinician and staff insights from a pilot learning collaborative. Contraception. 2024 02; 130:110280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  46. Barriers to abortion provision in primary care in New England, 2019-2020: A qualitative study. Contraception. 2023 01; 117:39-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  47. Provider and community stakeholder perspectives of expanding Medicaid coverage of abortion in Illinois. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 28; 22(1):413.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  48. Faculty and Resident Contraceptive Opt Outs and Training Site Restrictions: A CERA Study. Fam Med. 2022 Feb; 54(2):123-128.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  49. What you don't know can hurt you: Patient and provider perspectives on postpartum contraceptive care in Illinois Catholic Hospitals. Contraception. 2022 03; 107:62-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  50. Expectations about availability of contraception and abortion at a hypothetical Catholic hospital: Rural-urban disparities among Wisconsin women. Contraception. 2021 11; 104(5):506-511.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  51. Mifepristone restrictions and primary care: Breaking the cycle of stigma through a learning collaborative model in the United States. Contraception. 2021 07; 104(1):24-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  52. Restrictions on Reproductive Care at Catholic Hospitals: A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences and Perspectives. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Oct-Dec; 11(4):257-267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  53. Anticipatory Counseling About Miscarriage Management in Catholic Hospitals: A Qualitative Exploration of Women's Preferences. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 09; 52(3):171-179.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  54. Patient Views on Religious Institutional Health Care. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 12 02; 2(12):e1917008.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  55. Shared Decision-Making Framework for Pelvic Examinations in Asymptomatic, Nonpregnant Patients. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 04; 133(4):810-814.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  56. Physical Activity and Consumption Patterns of Reproductive-Aged Women by BMI Category. Matern Child Health J. 2018 05; 22(5):713-724.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  57. Medical Student Interest in Flexible Residency Training Options. Fam Med. 2018 05; 50(5):339-344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  58. Patient Experiences with Pregnancy Planning and Perspectives on Reproductive Care in Community Health Centers: A Qualitative Study of African American Women in Chicago. Womens Health Issues. 2017 May - Jun; 27(3):322-328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  59. Perceptions of a reproductive health self-assessment tool (RH-SAT) in an urban community health center. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec; 93(3):655-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.