The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Katharine Yao and Mark Sisco.
Katharine Yao
Connection Strength
4.343
Mark Sisco
  1. Trends and variation in the use of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer in the United States. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 11; 160(1):111-120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.628
  2. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: A contemporary perspective. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun; 113(8):883-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.605
  3. The quality-of-life benefits of breast reconstruction do not diminish with age. J Surg Oncol. 2015 May; 111(6):663-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.558
  4. Have we expanded the equitable delivery of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the new millennium? Evidence from the national cancer data base. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Nov; 215(5):658-66; discussion 666.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.474
  5. ASO Visual Abstract: Decision Regret About Breast Cancer Surgery-The WhySurg Study: Patients Undergoing Bilateral Mastectomy and Breast-Conserving Surgery Found to Have Lowest Levels of Regret. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec; 28(Suppl 3):749-750.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.225
  6. Patients Undergoing Bilateral Mastectomy and Breast-Conserving Surgery Have the Lowest Levels of Regret: The WhySurg Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct; 28(10):5686-5697.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  7. Patient-reported outcomes among women with unilateral breast cancer undergoing breast conservation versus single or double mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan; 185(2):359-369.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  8. Erratum to: Impact of an In-visit Decision Aid on Patient Knowledge about Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Pilot Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 12; 24(Suppl 3):687.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  9. Impact of an In-visit Decision Aid on Patient Knowledge about Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Pilot Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jan; 24(1):91-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  10. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2016; 8:213-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  11. Survey of the Deficits in Surgeons' Knowledge of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy. JAMA Surg. 2016 Apr; 151(4):391-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  12. Advanced Age Does Not Worsen Recovery or Long-Term Morbidity After Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Feb; 76(2):164-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  13. The Effect of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy on Perioperative Complications in Women Undergoing Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A NSQIP Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct; 22(11):3474-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  14. Advanced age is a predictor of 30-day complications after autologous but not implant-based postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Feb; 135(2):253e-261e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  15. Wait times for breast surgical operations, 2003-2011: a report from the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar; 22(3):899-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  16. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: an interim analysis and review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb; 22(2):370-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  17. The effect of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy on breast-related charges: A 5-year analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul; 118(1):212-220.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  18. Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: A prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep; 114(4):416-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.