The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Lixing Yang to Neoplasms

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lixing Yang has written about Neoplasms.
Connection Strength

4.246
  1. Transcription and DNA replication collisions lead to large tandem duplications and expose targetable therapeutic vulnerabilities in cancer. Nat Cancer. 2024 Dec; 5(12):1885-1901.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.298
  2. HYENA detects oncogenes activated by distal enhancers in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Sep 09; 52(16):e77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.294
  3. SFyNCS detects oncogenic fusions involving non-coding sequences in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023 10 13; 51(18):e96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.276
  4. Starfish infers signatures of complex genomic rearrangements across human cancers. Nat Cancer. 2022 10; 3(10):1247-1259.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.253
  5. Butler enables rapid cloud-based analysis of thousands of human genomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2020 03; 38(3):288-292.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.214
  6. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature. 2020 02; 578(7793):82-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.214
  7. Analyzing Somatic Genome Rearrangements in Human Cancers by Using Whole-Exome Sequencing. Am J Hum Genet. 2016 05 05; 98(5):843-856.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  8. Diverse mechanisms of somatic structural variations in human cancer genomes. Cell. 2013 May 09; 153(4):919-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  9. Retrospective evaluation of whole exome and genome mutation calls in 746 cancer samples. Nat Commun. 2020 09 21; 11(1):4748.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  10. Genomic footprints of activated telomere maintenance mechanisms in cancer. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):733.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  11. Combined burden and functional impact tests for cancer driver discovery using DriverPower. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):734.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  12. Divergent mutational processes distinguish hypoxic and normoxic tumours. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):737.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  13. High-coverage whole-genome analysis of 1220 cancers reveals hundreds of genes deregulated by rearrangement-mediated cis-regulatory alterations. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):736.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  14. Reconstructing evolutionary trajectories of mutation signature activities in cancer using TrackSig. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):731.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  15. Integrative pathway enrichment analysis of multivariate omics data. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):735.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  16. A deep learning system accurately classifies primary and metastatic cancers using passenger mutation patterns. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):728.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  17. Pathway and network analysis of more than 2500 whole cancer genomes. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):729.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  18. Cancer LncRNA Census reveals evidence for deep functional conservation of long noncoding RNAs in tumorigenesis. Commun Biol. 2020 02 05; 3(1):56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  19. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes identifies driver rearrangements promoted by LINE-1 retrotransposition. Nat Genet. 2020 03; 52(3):306-319.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  20. Disruption of chromatin folding domains by somatic genomic rearrangements in human cancer. Nat Genet. 2020 03; 52(3):294-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  21. The landscape of viral associations in human cancers. Nat Genet. 2020 03; 52(3):320-330.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  22. Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes. Nature. 2020 02; 578(7793):112-121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  23. The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer. Nature. 2020 02; 578(7793):94-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  24. The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project. Nat Genet. 2013 Oct; 45(10):1113-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  25. A functional genomic approach to actionable gene fusions for precision oncology. Sci Adv. 2022 02 11; 8(6):eabm2382.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  26. Sex differences in oncogenic mutational processes. Nat Commun. 2020 08 28; 11(1):4330.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  27. Dysregulation of cancer genes by recurrent intergenic fusions. Genome Biol. 2020 07 06; 21(1):166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  28. The evolutionary history of 2,658 cancers. Nature. 2020 02; 578(7793):122-128.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  29. Inferring structural variant cancer cell fraction. Nat Commun. 2020 02 05; 11(1):730.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  30. Comprehensive molecular characterization of mitochondrial genomes in human cancers. Nat Genet. 2020 03; 52(3):342-352.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  31. Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing. Nat Genet. 2020 03; 52(3):331-341.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  32. Analyses of non-coding somatic drivers in 2,658 cancer whole genomes. Nature. 2020 02; 578(7793):102-111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  33. Genomic basis for RNA alterations in cancer. Nature. 2020 02; 578(7793):129-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  34. Global impact of somatic structural variation on the DNA methylome of human cancers. Genome Biol. 2019 10 15; 20(1):209.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  35. A Pan-Cancer Compendium of Genes Deregulated by Somatic Genomic Rearrangement across More Than 1,400 Cases. Cell Rep. 2018 07 10; 24(2):515-527.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  36. A Pan-Cancer Proteogenomic Atlas of PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway Alterations. Cancer Cell. 2017 06 12; 31(6):820-832.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  37. Engineering and Functional Characterization of Fusion Genes Identifies Novel Oncogenic Drivers of Cancer. Cancer Res. 2017 07 01; 77(13):3502-3512.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  38. Multiplatform analysis of 12 cancer types reveals molecular classification within and across tissues of origin. Cell. 2014 Aug 14; 158(4):929-944.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.