The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Edward Awh to Attention

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Awh has written about Attention.
Edward Awh
Connection Strength
15.444
Attention
  1. Electroencephalogram Decoding Reveals Distinct Processes for Directing Spatial Attention and Encoding Into Working Memory. Psychol Sci. 2024 Oct; 35(10):1108-1138.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.697
  2. Object-based encoding constrains storage in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jan; 153(1):86-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.653
  3. Sustained Attention and Spatial Attention Distinctly Influence Long-term Memory Encoding. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 09 01; 33(10):2132-2148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.568
  4. Perceptual Grouping Reveals Distinct Roles for Sustained Slow Wave Activity and Alpha Oscillations in Working Memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 06 01; 33(7):1354-1364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.558
  5. Covert Attention Increases the Gain of Stimulus-Evoked Population Codes. J Neurosci. 2021 02 24; 41(8):1802-1815.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.543
  6. Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture. Neuroimage. 2021 02 01; 226:117562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.537
  7. Covert Spatial Attention Speeds Target Individuation. J Neurosci. 2020 03 25; 40(13):2717-2726.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.510
  8. Alpha-band Activity Tracks the Zoom Lens of Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 02; 32(2):272-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.499
  9. Object-based biased competition during covert spatial orienting. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul; 81(5):1366-1385.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.488
  10. Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory. PLoS Biol. 2019 04; 17(4):e3000239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.482
  11. The role of alpha oscillations in spatial attention: limited evidence for a suppression account. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 10; 29:34-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.467
  12. Spatially Selective Alpha Oscillations Reveal Moment-by-Moment Trade-offs between Working Memory and Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 02; 30(2):256-266.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.434
  13. Alpha-Band Activity Reveals Spontaneous Representations of Spatial Position in Visual Working Memory. Curr Biol. 2017 Oct 23; 27(20):3216-3223.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.434
  14. Alpha-Band Oscillations Enable Spatially and Temporally Resolved Tracking of Covert Spatial Attention. Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul; 28(7):929-941.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.422
  15. Feature-Selective Attentional Modulations in Human Frontoparietal Cortex. J Neurosci. 2016 08 03; 36(31):8188-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.399
  16. The role of context in volitional control of feature-based attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Feb; 42(2):213-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.375
  17. Attention: feedback focuses a wandering mind. Nat Neurosci. 2015 Mar; 18(3):327-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.362
  18. Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 10; 26(10):2298-309.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.340
  19. Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar; 14(1):62-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.337
  20. Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun; 40(3):1022-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.333
  21. Attending multiple items decreases the selectivity of population responses in human primary visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2013 May 29; 33(22):9273-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.320
  22. A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun; 24(6):929-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.317
  23. Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug; 16(8):437-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.301
  24. The plateau in mnemonic resolution across large set sizes indicates discrete resource limits in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul; 74(5):891-910.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.301
  25. Increased sensitivity to perceptual interference in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 May; 18(3):511-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.295
  26. Statistical learning induces discrete shifts in the allocation of working memory resources. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec; 36(6):1419-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.269
  27. Discrete resource allocation in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct; 35(5):1359-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.249
  28. The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychol Res. 2009 Nov; 73(6):794-802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  29. Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb; 15(1):215-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  30. Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? J Vis. 2007 Feb 14; 7(2):7.1-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.207
  31. Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Mar; 10(3):124-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  32. Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28; 139(1):201-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  33. Resolving visual interference during covert spatial orienting: online attentional control through static records of prior visual experience. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 May; 134(2):192-206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  34. Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting. J Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec; 92(6):3538-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  35. Evidence against a central bottleneck during the attentional blink: multiple channels for configural and featural processing. Cogn Psychol. 2004 Jan; 48(1):95-126.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  36. Top-down control over biased competition during covert spatial orienting. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb; 29(1):52-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  37. Pupillometry signatures of sustained attention and working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Nov; 84(8):2472-2482.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  38. Storage in Visual Working Memory Recruits a Content-Independent Pointer System. Psychol Sci. 2022 10; 33(10):1680-1694.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  39. Evidence for two components of object-based selection. Psychol Sci. 2001 Jul; 12(4):329-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  40. Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory. Cereb Cortex. 2021 06 10; 31(7):3323-3337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  41. Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search. J Neurosci. 2021 04 07; 41(14):3180-3191.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  42. Attention fluctuations impact ongoing maintenance of information in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Dec; 27(6):1269-1278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  43. The role of spatial selective attention in working memory for locations: evidence from event-related potentials. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep; 12(5):840-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  44. Evidence for split attentional foci. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr; 26(2):834-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  45. Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 03; 32(3):558-569.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  46. Real-time triggering reveals concurrent lapses of attention and working memory. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 08; 3(8):808-816.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  47. Dissecting the Neural Focus of Attention Reveals Distinct Processes for Spatial Attention and Object-Based Storage in Visual Working Memory. Psychol Sci. 2019 04; 30(4):526-540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  48. Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 08; 30(8):1185-1196.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  49. Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory. Cogn Psychol. 2017 09; 97:79-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  50. The capacity to detect synchronous audiovisual events is severely limited: Evidence from mixture modeling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 12; 42(12):2115-2124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  51. Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jun; 71:1-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  52. The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item. Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar 01; 24(3):345-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  53. Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 19; 31(3):1128-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  54. Experience-dependent changes in the topography of visual crowding. J Vis. 2009 Oct 14; 9(11):15.1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  55. The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Jul; 20(2):194-205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  56. Rehearsal in spatial working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun; 24(3):780-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  57. Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May; 27(5):853-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  58. Factorial comparison of working memory models. Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan; 121(1):124-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  59. Sleep-dependent learning and practice-dependent deterioration in an orientation discrimination task. Behav Neurosci. 2008 Apr; 122(2):267-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.