The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Edward Awh to Memory, Short-Term

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Awh has written about Memory, Short-Term.
Edward Awh
Connection Strength
15.629
Memory, Short-Term
  1. Object-based encoding constrains storage in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jan; 153(1):86-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.736
  2. Distinguishing guesses from fuzzy memories: Further evidence for item limits in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul; 85(5):1695-1709.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.700
  3. Is There an Activity-silent Working Memory? J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 11 01; 34(12):2360-2374.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.693
  4. Change localization: A highly reliable and sensitive measure of capacity in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul; 85(5):1681-1694.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.691
  5. Perceptual Grouping Reveals Distinct Roles for Sustained Slow Wave Activity and Alpha Oscillations in Working Memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 06 01; 33(7):1354-1364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.628
  6. Estimating the statistical power to detect set-size effects in contralateral delay activity. Psychophysiology. 2021 05; 58(5):e13791.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.615
  7. Multivariate analysis reveals a generalizable human electrophysiological signature of working memory load. Psychophysiology. 2020 12; 57(12):e13691.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.601
  8. "Memory compression" effects in visual working memory are contingent on explicit long-term memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Aug; 148(8):1373-1385.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.553
  9. Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory. PLoS Biol. 2019 04; 17(4):e3000239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.543
  10. Chunking in working memory via content-free labels. Sci Rep. 2018 01 08; 8(1):23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.496
  11. Spatially Selective Alpha Oscillations Reveal Moment-by-Moment Trade-offs between Working Memory and Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 02; 30(2):256-266.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.489
  12. Alpha-Band Activity Reveals Spontaneous Representations of Spatial Position in Visual Working Memory. Curr Biol. 2017 Oct 23; 27(20):3216-3223.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.488
  13. Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory. Cogn Psychol. 2017 09; 97:79-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.480
  14. Induced a rhythms track the content and quality of visual working memory representations with high temporal precision. J Neurosci. 2014 May 28; 34(22):7587-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.386
  15. Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar; 14(1):62-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.380
  16. A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun; 24(6):929-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.357
  17. A neural measure of precision in visual working memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 May; 25(5):754-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.355
  18. Selection and storage of perceptual groups is constrained by a discrete resource in working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun; 39(3):824-835.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.345
  19. The plateau in mnemonic resolution across large set sizes indicates discrete resource limits in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul; 74(5):891-910.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.339
  20. Polymorphisms in the 5-HTTLPR gene mediate storage capacity of visual working memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 05; 24(5):1069-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.330
  21. Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 19; 31(3):1128-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.306
  22. Statistical learning induces discrete shifts in the allocation of working memory resources. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec; 36(6):1419-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.303
  23. Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct; 17(5):673-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.300
  24. A bilateral advantage for storage in visual working memory. Cognition. 2010 Oct; 117(1):69-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.296
  25. Spatially global representations in human primary visual cortex during working memory maintenance. J Neurosci. 2009 Dec 02; 29(48):15258-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.283
  26. Discrete resource allocation in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct; 35(5):1359-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.280
  27. Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb; 15(1):215-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.249
  28. The bouncer in the brain. Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan; 11(1):5-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  29. Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul; 18(7):622-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.239
  30. Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28; 139(1):201-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.215
  31. Pupillometry signatures of sustained attention and working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Nov; 84(8):2472-2482.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  32. Storage in Visual Working Memory Recruits a Content-Independent Pointer System. Psychol Sci. 2022 10; 33(10):1680-1694.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  33. Shared Representational Formats for Information Maintained in Working Memory and Information Retrieved from Long-Term Memory. Cereb Cortex. 2022 02 19; 32(5):1077-1092.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  34. Sustained Attention and Spatial Attention Distinctly Influence Long-term Memory Encoding. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 09 01; 33(10):2132-2148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  35. Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory. Cereb Cortex. 2021 06 10; 31(7):3323-3337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  36. Attention fluctuations impact ongoing maintenance of information in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Dec; 27(6):1269-1278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  37. Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 03; 32(3):558-569.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  38. Real-time triggering reveals concurrent lapses of attention and working memory. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 08; 3(8):808-816.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  39. Dissecting the Neural Focus of Attention Reveals Distinct Processes for Spatial Attention and Object-Based Storage in Visual Working Memory. Psychol Sci. 2019 04; 30(4):526-540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  40. Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory. Psychol Bull. 2018 09; 144(9):885-958.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  41. Benchmarks provide common ground for model development: Reply to Logie (2018) and Vandierendonck (2018). Psychol Bull. 2018 09; 144(9):972-977.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  42. Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 08; 30(8):1185-1196.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  43. The role of long-term memory in a test of visual working memory: Proactive facilitation but no proactive interference. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 01; 43(1):1-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  44. The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Mar; 62:100-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  45. Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May; 27(5):853-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  46. Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jun; 71:1-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  47. Factorial comparison of working memory models. Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan; 121(1):124-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  48. The positional-specificity effect reveals a passive-trace contribution to visual short-term memory. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e83483.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  49. Discrete capacity limits in visual working memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr; 20(2):177-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  50. Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb; 20(2):207-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  51. The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychol Res. 2009 Nov; 73(6):794-802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  52. The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Jul; 20(2):194-205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  53. Inter-electrode correlations measured with EEG predict individual differences in cognitive ability. Curr Biol. 2021 11 22; 31(22):4998-5008.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  54. The role of parietal cortex in verbal working memory. J Neurosci. 1998 Jul 01; 18(13):5026-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.