Edward Awh to Photic Stimulation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Awh has written about Photic Stimulation.
Connection Strength
3.132
-
Induced a rhythms track the content and quality of visual working memory representations with high temporal precision. J Neurosci. 2014 May 28; 34(22):7587-99.
Score: 0.414
-
Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search. J Neurosci. 2021 04 07; 41(14):3180-3191.
Score: 0.165
-
Covert Attention Increases the Gain of Stimulus-Evoked Population Codes. J Neurosci. 2021 02 24; 41(8):1802-1815.
Score: 0.164
-
Covert Spatial Attention Speeds Target Individuation. J Neurosci. 2020 03 25; 40(13):2717-2726.
Score: 0.154
-
"Memory compression" effects in visual working memory are contingent on explicit long-term memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Aug; 148(8):1373-1385.
Score: 0.148
-
Object-based biased competition during covert spatial orienting. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul; 81(5):1366-1385.
Score: 0.147
-
Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory. PLoS Biol. 2019 04; 17(4):e3000239.
Score: 0.145
-
The role of alpha oscillations in spatial attention: limited evidence for a suppression account. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 10; 29:34-40.
Score: 0.141
-
Chunking in working memory via content-free labels. Sci Rep. 2018 01 08; 8(1):23.
Score: 0.133
-
Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 10; 26(10):2298-309.
Score: 0.103
-
Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar; 14(1):62-77.
Score: 0.102
-
Attending multiple items decreases the selectivity of population responses in human primary visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2013 May 29; 33(22):9273-82.
Score: 0.097
-
A neural measure of precision in visual working memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 May; 25(5):754-61.
Score: 0.095
-
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug; 16(8):437-43.
Score: 0.091
-
Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing. J Neurosci. 2012 May 23; 32(21):7169-77.
Score: 0.090
-
Increased sensitivity to perceptual interference in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 May; 18(3):511-20.
Score: 0.089
-
Polymorphisms in the 5-HTTLPR gene mediate storage capacity of visual working memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 05; 24(5):1069-76.
Score: 0.088
-
Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct; 17(5):673-9.
Score: 0.080
-
A bilateral advantage for storage in visual working memory. Cognition. 2010 Oct; 117(1):69-79.
Score: 0.079
-
Spatially global representations in human primary visual cortex during working memory maintenance. J Neurosci. 2009 Dec 02; 29(48):15258-65.
Score: 0.076
-
Experience-dependent changes in the topography of visual crowding. J Vis. 2009 Oct 14; 9(11):15.1-9.
Score: 0.075
-
Discrete resource allocation in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct; 35(5):1359-67.
Score: 0.075
-
Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? J Vis. 2007 Feb 14; 7(2):7.1-23.
Score: 0.062
-
Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting. J Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec; 92(6):3538-45.
Score: 0.052
-
Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory. Cereb Cortex. 2021 06 10; 31(7):3323-3337.
Score: 0.042
-
The role of spatial selective attention in working memory for locations: evidence from event-related potentials. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep; 12(5):840-7.
Score: 0.040
-
Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 08; 30(8):1185-1196.
Score: 0.034
-
The role of long-term memory in a test of visual working memory: Proactive facilitation but no proactive interference. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 01; 43(1):1-22.
Score: 0.030
-
The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Mar; 62:100-8.
Score: 0.029
-
Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May; 27(5):853-65.
Score: 0.027
-
Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jun; 71:1-26.
Score: 0.025
-
The positional-specificity effect reveals a passive-trace contribution to visual short-term memory. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e83483.
Score: 0.025
-
The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Jul; 20(2):194-205.
Score: 0.013