Edward Awh to Pattern Recognition, Visual
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Awh has written about Pattern Recognition, Visual.
Connection Strength
5.663
-
Alpha-band Activity Tracks the Zoom Lens of Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 02; 32(2):272-282.
Score: 0.645
-
Induced a rhythms track the content and quality of visual working memory representations with high temporal precision. J Neurosci. 2014 May 28; 34(22):7587-99.
Score: 0.443
-
Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 10; 26(10):2298-309.
Score: 0.440
-
Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun; 40(3):1022-33.
Score: 0.430
-
A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun; 24(6):929-38.
Score: 0.410
-
A neural measure of precision in visual working memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 May; 25(5):754-61.
Score: 0.407
-
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug; 16(8):437-43.
Score: 0.389
-
The plateau in mnemonic resolution across large set sizes indicates discrete resource limits in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul; 74(5):891-910.
Score: 0.389
-
Statistical learning induces discrete shifts in the allocation of working memory resources. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec; 36(6):1419-29.
Score: 0.348
-
Experience-dependent changes in the topography of visual crowding. J Vis. 2009 Oct 14; 9(11):15.1-9.
Score: 0.322
-
Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb; 15(1):215-22.
Score: 0.286
-
Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul; 18(7):622-8.
Score: 0.275
-
Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? J Vis. 2007 Feb 14; 7(2):7.1-23.
Score: 0.268
-
Evidence for split attentional foci. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr; 26(2):834-46.
Score: 0.166
-
The capacity to detect synchronous audiovisual events is severely limited: Evidence from mixture modeling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 12; 42(12):2115-2124.
Score: 0.132
-
The role of context in volitional control of feature-based attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Feb; 42(2):213-24.
Score: 0.121
-
A bilateral advantage for storage in visual working memory. Cognition. 2010 Oct; 117(1):69-79.
Score: 0.085
-
Sleep-dependent learning and practice-dependent deterioration in an orientation discrimination task. Behav Neurosci. 2008 Apr; 122(2):267-72.
Score: 0.072
-
Factorial comparison of working memory models. Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan; 121(1):124-49.
Score: 0.027
-
PET evidence for an amodal verbal working memory system. Neuroimage. 1996 Apr; 3(2):79-88.
Score: 0.008