Edward Awh to Space Perception
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Awh has written about Space Perception.
Connection Strength
6.890
-
Covert Spatial Attention Speeds Target Individuation. J Neurosci. 2020 03 25; 40(13):2717-2726.
Score: 0.663
-
Alpha-band Activity Tracks the Zoom Lens of Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 02; 32(2):272-282.
Score: 0.649
-
Object-based biased competition during covert spatial orienting. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul; 81(5):1366-1385.
Score: 0.635
-
The role of alpha oscillations in spatial attention: limited evidence for a suppression account. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 10; 29:34-40.
Score: 0.608
-
Alpha-Band Oscillations Enable Spatially and Temporally Resolved Tracking of Covert Spatial Attention. Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul; 28(7):929-941.
Score: 0.549
-
Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar; 14(1):62-77.
Score: 0.439
-
Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun; 40(3):1022-33.
Score: 0.433
-
Spatially global representations in human primary visual cortex during working memory maintenance. J Neurosci. 2009 Dec 02; 29(48):15258-65.
Score: 0.327
-
Experience-dependent changes in the topography of visual crowding. J Vis. 2009 Oct 14; 9(11):15.1-9.
Score: 0.324
-
Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? J Vis. 2007 Feb 14; 7(2):7.1-23.
Score: 0.269
-
Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Mar; 10(3):124-30.
Score: 0.251
-
Resolving visual interference during covert spatial orienting: online attentional control through static records of prior visual experience. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 May; 134(2):192-206.
Score: 0.238
-
Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting. J Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec; 92(6):3538-45.
Score: 0.225
-
Top-down control over biased competition during covert spatial orienting. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb; 29(1):52-63.
Score: 0.204
-
Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search. J Neurosci. 2021 04 07; 41(14):3180-3191.
Score: 0.178
-
Multivariate analysis reveals a generalizable human electrophysiological signature of working memory load. Psychophysiology. 2020 12; 57(12):e13691.
Score: 0.174
-
The role of spatial selective attention in working memory for locations: evidence from event-related potentials. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep; 12(5):840-7.
Score: 0.172
-
Rehearsal in spatial working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun; 24(3):780-90.
Score: 0.147
-
Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 08; 30(8):1185-1196.
Score: 0.146
-
Spatially Selective Alpha Oscillations Reveal Moment-by-Moment Trade-offs between Working Memory and Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 02; 30(2):256-266.
Score: 0.141
-
The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Jul; 20(2):194-205.
Score: 0.056
-
Human rehearsal processes and the frontal lobes: PET evidence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995 Dec 15; 769:97-117.
Score: 0.031
-
Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May; 27(5):853-65.
Score: 0.029