Edward Vogel to Adolescent
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Vogel has written about Adolescent.
Connection Strength
0.762
-
Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering. Cereb Cortex. 2019 02 01; 29(2):529-543.
Score: 0.066
-
Improvements to visual working memory performance with practice and feedback. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8):e0203279.
Score: 0.065
-
Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May; 27(5):853-65.
Score: 0.050
-
Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jun; 71:1-26.
Score: 0.047
-
Delineating the neural signatures of tracking spatial position and working memory during attentive tracking. J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 12; 31(2):659-68.
Score: 0.038
-
Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory. J Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr; 103(4):1963-8.
Score: 0.036
-
Attentional enhancement during multiple-object tracking. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr; 16(2):411-7.
Score: 0.034
-
Neural measures of individual differences in selecting and tracking multiple moving objects. J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 16; 28(16):4183-91.
Score: 0.031
-
Selective storage and maintenance of an object's features in visual working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb; 15(1):223-9.
Score: 0.031
-
Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul; 18(7):622-8.
Score: 0.030
-
Electrophysiological measures of maintaining representations in visual working memory. Cortex. 2007 Jan; 43(1):77-94.
Score: 0.029
-
The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Dec; 32(6):1436-51.
Score: 0.029
-
Pushing around the locus of selection: evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Dec; 17(12):1907-22.
Score: 0.027
-
Fractionating working memory: consolidation and maintenance are independent processes. Psychol Sci. 2005 Feb; 16(2):106-13.
Score: 0.025
-
Delayed working memory consolidation during the attentional blink. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec; 9(4):739-43.
Score: 0.022
-
Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory. Cereb Cortex. 2021 06 10; 31(7):3323-3337.
Score: 0.020
-
The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology. 2000 Mar; 37(2):190-203.
Score: 0.018
-
Distinguishing cognitive effort and working memory load using scale-invariance and alpha suppression in EEG. Neuroimage. 2020 05 01; 211:116622.
Score: 0.018
-
Alpha-band oscillations track the retrieval of precise spatial representations from long-term memory. J Neurophysiol. 2019 08 01; 122(2):539-551.
Score: 0.017
-
Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory. PLoS Biol. 2019 04; 17(4):e3000239.
Score: 0.017
-
Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Dec; 24(6):1656-74.
Score: 0.016
-
Alpha-Band Oscillations Enable Spatially and Temporally Resolved Tracking of Covert Spatial Attention. Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul; 28(7):929-941.
Score: 0.015
-
The topography of alpha-band activity tracks the content of spatial working memory. J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan 01; 115(1):168-77.
Score: 0.013
-
Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 10; 26(10):2298-309.
Score: 0.012
-
Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar; 14(1):62-77.
Score: 0.012
-
No behavioral or ERP evidence for a developmental lag in visual working memory capacity or filtering in adolescents and adults with ADHD. PLoS One. 2013; 8(5):e62673.
Score: 0.011
-
Prolonged disengagement from attentional capture in normal aging. Psychol Aging. 2013 Mar; 28(1):77-86.
Score: 0.011
-
Electrophysiological evidence for immature processing capacity and filtering in visuospatial working memory in adolescents. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e42262.
Score: 0.011
-
The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Aug; 35(4):1140-60.
Score: 0.009
-
Voluntazy and automatic attentional control of visual working memory. Percept Psychophys. 2002 Jul; 64(5):754-63.
Score: 0.005