Edward Vogel to Photic Stimulation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Vogel has written about Photic Stimulation.
Connection Strength
2.448
-
Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jul; 79(5):1506-1523.
Score: 0.512
-
Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering. Cereb Cortex. 2019 02 01; 29(2):529-543.
Score: 0.143
-
Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 08; 30(8):1185-1196.
Score: 0.135
-
The reliability and stability of visual working memory capacity. Behav Res Methods. 2018 04; 50(2):576-588.
Score: 0.135
-
The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Mar; 62:100-8.
Score: 0.116
-
a Power Modulation and Event-Related Slow Wave Provide Dissociable Correlates of Visual Working Memory. J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 14; 35(41):14009-16.
Score: 0.114
-
The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16.
Score: 0.109
-
Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May; 27(5):853-65.
Score: 0.107
-
Induced a rhythms track the content and quality of visual working memory representations with high temporal precision. J Neurosci. 2014 May 28; 34(22):7587-99.
Score: 0.103
-
Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jun; 71:1-26.
Score: 0.101
-
Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug; 17(8):391-400.
Score: 0.097
-
Neural limits to representing objects still within view. J Neurosci. 2013 May 08; 33(19):8257-63.
Score: 0.096
-
Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking. Cognition. 2013 Feb; 126(2):213-23.
Score: 0.093
-
Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory. J Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr; 103(4):1963-8.
Score: 0.077
-
Human variation in overriding attentional capture. J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 08; 29(27):8726-33.
Score: 0.074
-
Neural measures of individual differences in selecting and tracking multiple moving objects. J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 16; 28(16):4183-91.
Score: 0.068
-
Pushing around the locus of selection: evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Dec; 17(12):1907-22.
Score: 0.057
-
Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature. 2005 Nov 24; 438(7067):500-3.
Score: 0.057
-
Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory. Cereb Cortex. 2021 06 10; 31(7):3323-3337.
Score: 0.042
-
Unconscious Number Discrimination in the Human Visual System. Cereb Cortex. 2020 10 01; 30(11):5821-5829.
Score: 0.040
-
Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory. PLoS Biol. 2019 04; 17(4):e3000239.
Score: 0.036
-
Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 10; 26(10):2298-309.
Score: 0.026
-
Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar; 14(1):62-77.
Score: 0.025
-
Impaired contingent attentional capture predicts reduced working memory capacity in schizophrenia. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e48586.
Score: 0.023
-
Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing. J Neurosci. 2012 May 23; 32(21):7169-77.
Score: 0.022
-
Are old adults just like low working memory young adults? Filtering efficiency and age differences in visual working memory. Cereb Cortex. 2011 May; 21(5):1147-54.
Score: 0.020
-
Visual working memory deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease are due to both reduced storage capacity and impaired ability to filter out irrelevant information. Brain. 2010 Sep; 133(9):2677-89.
Score: 0.020