The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Edward Vogel to Visual Perception

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Vogel has written about Visual Perception.
Edward Vogel
Connection Strength
10.029
Visual Perception
  1. No Evidence for an Object Working Memory Capacity Benefit with Extended Viewing Time. eNeuro. 2020 Sep/Oct; 7(5).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.598
  2. Visual short-term memory capacity predicts the "bandwidth" of visual long-term memory encoding. Mem Cognit. 2019 11; 47(8):1481-1497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.562
  3. Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering. Cereb Cortex. 2019 02 01; 29(2):529-543.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.534
  4. Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 08; 30(8):1185-1196.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.506
  5. The reliability and stability of visual working memory capacity. Behav Res Methods. 2018 04; 50(2):576-588.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.503
  6. Contralateral Delay Activity Tracks Fluctuations in Working Memory Performance. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 09; 30(9):1229-1240.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.496
  7. Reducing failures of working memory with performance feedback. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 10; 23(5):1520-1527.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.454
  8. The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Mar; 62:100-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.432
  9. Come together, right now: dynamic overwriting of an object's history through common fate. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Aug; 26(8):1819-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.379
  10. Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug; 17(8):391-400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.363
  11. Neural limits to representing objects still within view. J Neurosci. 2013 May 08; 33(19):8257-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.359
  12. Neural measures of dynamic changes in attentive tracking load. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Feb; 24(2):440-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.317
  13. Visual search demands dictate reliance on working memory storage. J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 20; 31(16):6199-207.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.311
  14. Discrete capacity limits in visual working memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr; 20(2):177-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.289
  15. Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory. J Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr; 103(4):1963-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.286
  16. Electrophysiological measures of maintaining representations in visual working memory. Cortex. 2007 Jan; 43(1):77-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.231
  17. The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Dec; 32(6):1436-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  18. Pushing around the locus of selection: evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Dec; 17(12):1907-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.214
  19. Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature. 2005 Nov 24; 438(7067):500-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.214
  20. Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature. 2004 Apr 15; 428(6984):748-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  21. Change localization: A highly reliable and sensitive measure of capacity in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul; 85(5):1681-1694.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  22. Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory. Cereb Cortex. 2021 06 10; 31(7):3323-3337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  23. Estimating the statistical power to detect set-size effects in contralateral delay activity. Psychophysiology. 2021 05; 58(5):e13791.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  24. Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Feb; 27(1):92-114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  25. The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology. 2000 Mar; 37(2):190-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  26. Distinguishing cognitive effort and working memory load using scale-invariance and alpha suppression in EEG. Neuroimage. 2020 05 01; 211:116622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  27. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature. 1997 Nov 20; 390(6657):279-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  28. Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory. Cogn Psychol. 2017 09; 97:79-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  29. Alpha-Band Oscillations Enable Spatially and Temporally Resolved Tracking of Covert Spatial Attention. Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul; 28(7):929-941.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  30. a Power Modulation and Event-Related Slow Wave Provide Dissociable Correlates of Visual Working Memory. J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 14; 35(41):14009-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  31. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  32. Prolonged disengagement from attentional capture in normal aging. Psychol Aging. 2013 Mar; 28(1):77-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  33. Selection and storage of perceptual groups is constrained by a discrete resource in working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun; 39(3):824-835.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  34. Electrophysiological evidence for immature processing capacity and filtering in visuospatial working memory in adolescents. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e42262.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  35. Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing. J Neurosci. 2012 May 23; 32(21):7169-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  36. The effects of two types of sleep deprivation on visual working memory capacity and filtering efficiency. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e35653.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  37. Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 19; 31(3):1128-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  38. Are old adults just like low working memory young adults? Filtering efficiency and age differences in visual working memory. Cereb Cortex. 2011 May; 21(5):1147-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  39. The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Aug; 35(4):1140-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  40. Event-related potential measures of visual working memory. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2006 Oct; 37(4):286-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  41. Voluntazy and automatic attentional control of visual working memory. Percept Psychophys. 2002 Jul; 64(5):754-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  42. Lower region: a new cue for figure-ground assignment. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Jun; 131(2):194-205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  43. The visual arrays task: Visual storage capacity or attention control? J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Dec; 150(12):2525-2551.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  44. Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychol Sci. 2001 May; 12(3):219-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  45. Multivariate analysis reveals a generalizable human electrophysiological signature of working memory load. Psychophysiology. 2020 12; 57(12):e13691.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  46. Unconscious Number Discrimination in the Human Visual System. Cereb Cortex. 2020 10 01; 30(11):5821-5829.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  47. Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 03; 32(3):558-569.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  48. Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Aug 29; 353(1373):1257-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  49. Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature. 1996 Oct 17; 383(6601):616-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  50. Dynamic neuroplasticity after human prefrontal cortex damage. Neuron. 2010 Nov 04; 68(3):401-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  51. Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28; 139(1):201-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.