Edward Vogel to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Vogel has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
0.991
-
Sequential encoding paradigm reliably captures the individual differences from a simultaneous visual working memory task. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Feb; 85(2):366-376.
Score: 0.030
-
Pupillometry signatures of sustained attention and working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Nov; 84(8):2472-2482.
Score: 0.029
-
Attention fluctuations impact ongoing maintenance of information in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Dec; 27(6):1269-1278.
Score: 0.026
-
No Evidence for an Object Working Memory Capacity Benefit with Extended Viewing Time. eNeuro. 2020 Sep/Oct; 7(5).
Score: 0.025
-
Visual short-term memory capacity predicts the "bandwidth" of visual long-term memory encoding. Mem Cognit. 2019 11; 47(8):1481-1497.
Score: 0.024
-
Real-time triggering reveals concurrent lapses of attention and working memory. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 08; 3(8):808-816.
Score: 0.023
-
Dissecting the Neural Focus of Attention Reveals Distinct Processes for Spatial Attention and Object-Based Storage in Visual Working Memory. Psychol Sci. 2019 04; 30(4):526-540.
Score: 0.023
-
Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering. Cereb Cortex. 2019 02 01; 29(2):529-543.
Score: 0.023
-
Improvements to visual working memory performance with practice and feedback. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8):e0203279.
Score: 0.022
-
Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 08; 30(8):1185-1196.
Score: 0.021
-
The reliability and stability of visual working memory capacity. Behav Res Methods. 2018 04; 50(2):576-588.
Score: 0.021
-
Contralateral Delay Activity Tracks Fluctuations in Working Memory Performance. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 09; 30(9):1229-1240.
Score: 0.021
-
Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jul; 79(5):1506-1523.
Score: 0.020
-
Reducing failures of working memory with performance feedback. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 10; 23(5):1520-1527.
Score: 0.019
-
Tuning in by tuning out distractions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 29; 113(13):3422-3.
Score: 0.018
-
The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Mar; 62:100-8.
Score: 0.018
-
a Power Modulation and Event-Related Slow Wave Provide Dissociable Correlates of Visual Working Memory. J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 14; 35(41):14009-16.
Score: 0.018
-
Neurocognitive Architecture of Working Memory. Neuron. 2015 Oct 07; 88(1):33-46.
Score: 0.018
-
The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16.
Score: 0.017
-
Attention: feedback focuses a wandering mind. Nat Neurosci. 2015 Mar; 18(3):327-8.
Score: 0.017
-
Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May; 27(5):853-65.
Score: 0.017
-
A soft handoff of attention between cerebral hemispheres. Curr Biol. 2014 May 19; 24(10):1133-7.
Score: 0.016
-
Come together, right now: dynamic overwriting of an object's history through common fate. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Aug; 26(8):1819-28.
Score: 0.016
-
Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jun; 71:1-26.
Score: 0.016
-
Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug; 17(8):391-400.
Score: 0.015
-
Neural limits to representing objects still within view. J Neurosci. 2013 May 08; 33(19):8257-63.
Score: 0.015
-
Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking. Cognition. 2013 Feb; 126(2):213-23.
Score: 0.015
-
Neural measures of dynamic changes in attentive tracking load. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Feb; 24(2):440-50.
Score: 0.013
-
Visual search demands dictate reliance on working memory storage. J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 20; 31(16):6199-207.
Score: 0.013
-
Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture. Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar; 22(3):361-8.
Score: 0.013
-
Delineating the neural signatures of tracking spatial position and working memory during attentive tracking. J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 12; 31(2):659-68.
Score: 0.013
-
Shape and color conjunction stimuli are represented as bound objects in visual working memory. Neuropsychologia. 2011 May; 49(6):1632-9.
Score: 0.013
-
Discrete capacity limits in visual working memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr; 20(2):177-82.
Score: 0.012
-
Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory. J Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr; 103(4):1963-8.
Score: 0.012
-
In mind and out of phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 15; 106(50):21017-8.
Score: 0.012
-
Human variation in overriding attentional capture. J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 08; 29(27):8726-33.
Score: 0.012
-
Attentional enhancement during multiple-object tracking. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr; 16(2):411-7.
Score: 0.011
-
Neural measures of individual differences in selecting and tracking multiple moving objects. J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 16; 28(16):4183-91.
Score: 0.011
-
Selective storage and maintenance of an object's features in visual working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb; 15(1):223-9.
Score: 0.011
-
The bouncer in the brain. Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan; 11(1):5-6.
Score: 0.010
-
Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul; 18(7):622-8.
Score: 0.010
-
Electrophysiological measures of maintaining representations in visual working memory. Cortex. 2007 Jan; 43(1):77-94.
Score: 0.010
-
The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Dec; 32(6):1436-51.
Score: 0.010
-
Event-related potential measures of visual working memory. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2006 Oct; 37(4):286-91.
Score: 0.010
-
Pushing around the locus of selection: evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Dec; 17(12):1907-22.
Score: 0.009
-
Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature. 2005 Nov 24; 438(7067):500-3.
Score: 0.009
-
Fractionating working memory: consolidation and maintenance are independent processes. Psychol Sci. 2005 Feb; 16(2):106-13.
Score: 0.009
-
Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature. 2004 Apr 15; 428(6984):748-51.
Score: 0.008
-
Delayed working memory consolidation during the attentional blink. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec; 9(4):739-43.
Score: 0.007
-
Change localization: A highly reliable and sensitive measure of capacity in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul; 85(5):1681-1694.
Score: 0.007
-
Storage in Visual Working Memory Recruits a Content-Independent Pointer System. Psychol Sci. 2022 10; 33(10):1680-1694.
Score: 0.007
-
Inter-electrode correlations measured with EEG predict individual differences in cognitive ability. Curr Biol. 2021 11 22; 31(22):4998-5008.e6.
Score: 0.007
-
The visual arrays task: Visual storage capacity or attention control? J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Dec; 150(12):2525-2551.
Score: 0.007
-
Sustained Attention and Spatial Attention Distinctly Influence Long-term Memory Encoding. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 09 01; 33(10):2132-2148.
Score: 0.007
-
Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory. Cereb Cortex. 2021 06 10; 31(7):3323-3337.
Score: 0.007
-
Perceptual Grouping Reveals Distinct Roles for Sustained Slow Wave Activity and Alpha Oscillations in Working Memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 06 01; 33(7):1354-1364.
Score: 0.007
-
Estimating the statistical power to detect set-size effects in contralateral delay activity. Psychophysiology. 2021 05; 58(5):e13791.
Score: 0.006
-
Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Feb; 27(1):92-114.
Score: 0.006
-
Multivariate analysis reveals a generalizable human electrophysiological signature of working memory load. Psychophysiology. 2020 12; 57(12):e13691.
Score: 0.006
-
Unconscious Number Discrimination in the Human Visual System. Cereb Cortex. 2020 10 01; 30(11):5821-5829.
Score: 0.006
-
?9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) impairs visual working memory performance: a randomized crossover trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020 10; 45(11):1807-1816.
Score: 0.006
-
The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology. 2000 Mar; 37(2):190-203.
Score: 0.006
-
Distinguishing cognitive effort and working memory load using scale-invariance and alpha suppression in EEG. Neuroimage. 2020 05 01; 211:116622.
Score: 0.006
-
Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 03; 32(3):558-569.
Score: 0.006
-
Alpha-band oscillations track the retrieval of precise spatial representations from long-term memory. J Neurophysiol. 2019 08 01; 122(2):539-551.
Score: 0.006
-
Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory. PLoS Biol. 2019 04; 17(4):e3000239.
Score: 0.006
-
Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Dec; 24(6):1656-74.
Score: 0.006
-
The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature. 1997 Nov 20; 390(6657):279-81.
Score: 0.005
-
Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory. Cogn Psychol. 2017 09; 97:79-97.
Score: 0.005
-
Alpha-Band Oscillations Enable Spatially and Temporally Resolved Tracking of Covert Spatial Attention. Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul; 28(7):929-941.
Score: 0.005
-
The topography of alpha-band activity tracks the content of spatial working memory. J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan 01; 115(1):168-77.
Score: 0.004
-
Induced a rhythms track the content and quality of visual working memory representations with high temporal precision. J Neurosci. 2014 May 28; 34(22):7587-99.
Score: 0.004
-
Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 10; 26(10):2298-309.
Score: 0.004
-
Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar; 14(1):62-77.
Score: 0.004
-
No behavioral or ERP evidence for a developmental lag in visual working memory capacity or filtering in adolescents and adults with ADHD. PLoS One. 2013; 8(5):e62673.
Score: 0.004
-
A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun; 24(6):929-38.
Score: 0.004
-
Impaired contingent attentional capture predicts reduced working memory capacity in schizophrenia. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e48586.
Score: 0.004
-
Prolonged disengagement from attentional capture in normal aging. Psychol Aging. 2013 Mar; 28(1):77-86.
Score: 0.004
-
Selection and storage of perceptual groups is constrained by a discrete resource in working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun; 39(3):824-835.
Score: 0.004
-
Electrophysiological evidence for immature processing capacity and filtering in visuospatial working memory in adolescents. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e42262.
Score: 0.004
-
Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing. J Neurosci. 2012 May 23; 32(21):7169-77.
Score: 0.004
-
The effects of two types of sleep deprivation on visual working memory capacity and filtering efficiency. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e35653.
Score: 0.004
-
Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 19; 31(3):1128-38.
Score: 0.003
-
Statistical learning induces discrete shifts in the allocation of working memory resources. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec; 36(6):1419-29.
Score: 0.003
-
Dynamic neuroplasticity after human prefrontal cortex damage. Neuron. 2010 Nov 04; 68(3):401-8.
Score: 0.003
-
Are old adults just like low working memory young adults? Filtering efficiency and age differences in visual working memory. Cereb Cortex. 2011 May; 21(5):1147-54.
Score: 0.003
-
Visual working memory deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease are due to both reduced storage capacity and impaired ability to filter out irrelevant information. Brain. 2010 Sep; 133(9):2677-89.
Score: 0.003
-
The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Aug; 35(4):1140-60.
Score: 0.003
-
Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb; 20(2):207-14.
Score: 0.003
-
Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb; 15(1):215-22.
Score: 0.003
-
Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28; 139(1):201-8.
Score: 0.002
-
Voluntazy and automatic attentional control of visual working memory. Percept Psychophys. 2002 Jul; 64(5):754-63.
Score: 0.002
-
Lower region: a new cue for figure-ground assignment. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Jun; 131(2):194-205.
Score: 0.002
-
Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychol Sci. 2001 May; 12(3):219-24.
Score: 0.002
-
Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Aug 29; 353(1373):1257-70.
Score: 0.001
-
Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature. 1996 Oct 17; 383(6601):616-8.
Score: 0.001