Edward Vogel to Male
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Edward Vogel has written about Male.
Connection Strength
0.682
-
Attention fluctuations impact ongoing maintenance of information in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Dec; 27(6):1269-1278.
Score: 0.040
-
Real-time triggering reveals concurrent lapses of attention and working memory. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 08; 3(8):808-816.
Score: 0.036
-
Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering. Cereb Cortex. 2019 02 01; 29(2):529-543.
Score: 0.035
-
Improvements to visual working memory performance with practice and feedback. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8):e0203279.
Score: 0.034
-
Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 08; 30(8):1185-1196.
Score: 0.033
-
The reliability and stability of visual working memory capacity. Behav Res Methods. 2018 04; 50(2):576-588.
Score: 0.033
-
Contralateral Delay Activity Tracks Fluctuations in Working Memory Performance. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 09; 30(9):1229-1240.
Score: 0.032
-
Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jul; 79(5):1506-1523.
Score: 0.031
-
Reducing failures of working memory with performance feedback. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 10; 23(5):1520-1527.
Score: 0.030
-
Tuning in by tuning out distractions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 29; 113(13):3422-3.
Score: 0.029
-
a Power Modulation and Event-Related Slow Wave Provide Dissociable Correlates of Visual Working Memory. J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 14; 35(41):14009-16.
Score: 0.028
-
Attention: feedback focuses a wandering mind. Nat Neurosci. 2015 Mar; 18(3):327-8.
Score: 0.027
-
Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May; 27(5):853-65.
Score: 0.026
-
Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jun; 71:1-26.
Score: 0.025
-
Neural limits to representing objects still within view. J Neurosci. 2013 May 08; 33(19):8257-63.
Score: 0.024
-
Attentional enhancement during multiple-object tracking. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr; 16(2):411-7.
Score: 0.018
-
Selective storage and maintenance of an object's features in visual working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb; 15(1):223-9.
Score: 0.016
-
Pushing around the locus of selection: evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Dec; 17(12):1907-22.
Score: 0.014
-
Fractionating working memory: consolidation and maintenance are independent processes. Psychol Sci. 2005 Feb; 16(2):106-13.
Score: 0.013
-
Delayed working memory consolidation during the attentional blink. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec; 9(4):739-43.
Score: 0.011
-
Inter-electrode correlations measured with EEG predict individual differences in cognitive ability. Curr Biol. 2021 11 22; 31(22):4998-5008.e6.
Score: 0.011
-
Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory. Cereb Cortex. 2021 06 10; 31(7):3323-3337.
Score: 0.010
-
Unconscious Number Discrimination in the Human Visual System. Cereb Cortex. 2020 10 01; 30(11):5821-5829.
Score: 0.010
-
The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology. 2000 Mar; 37(2):190-203.
Score: 0.009
-
Distinguishing cognitive effort and working memory load using scale-invariance and alpha suppression in EEG. Neuroimage. 2020 05 01; 211:116622.
Score: 0.009
-
Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 03; 32(3):558-569.
Score: 0.009
-
Alpha-band oscillations track the retrieval of precise spatial representations from long-term memory. J Neurophysiol. 2019 08 01; 122(2):539-551.
Score: 0.009
-
Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory. PLoS Biol. 2019 04; 17(4):e3000239.
Score: 0.009
-
Induced a rhythms track the content and quality of visual working memory representations with high temporal precision. J Neurosci. 2014 May 28; 34(22):7587-99.
Score: 0.006
-
Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 10; 26(10):2298-309.
Score: 0.006
-
No behavioral or ERP evidence for a developmental lag in visual working memory capacity or filtering in adolescents and adults with ADHD. PLoS One. 2013; 8(5):e62673.
Score: 0.006
-
Impaired contingent attentional capture predicts reduced working memory capacity in schizophrenia. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e48586.
Score: 0.006
-
Prolonged disengagement from attentional capture in normal aging. Psychol Aging. 2013 Mar; 28(1):77-86.
Score: 0.006
-
Electrophysiological evidence for immature processing capacity and filtering in visuospatial working memory in adolescents. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e42262.
Score: 0.006
-
Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing. J Neurosci. 2012 May 23; 32(21):7169-77.
Score: 0.005
-
The effects of two types of sleep deprivation on visual working memory capacity and filtering efficiency. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e35653.
Score: 0.005
-
Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 19; 31(3):1128-38.
Score: 0.005
-
Dynamic neuroplasticity after human prefrontal cortex damage. Neuron. 2010 Nov 04; 68(3):401-8.
Score: 0.005
-
Are old adults just like low working memory young adults? Filtering efficiency and age differences in visual working memory. Cereb Cortex. 2011 May; 21(5):1147-54.
Score: 0.005
-
Visual working memory deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease are due to both reduced storage capacity and impaired ability to filter out irrelevant information. Brain. 2010 Sep; 133(9):2677-89.
Score: 0.005
-
Voluntazy and automatic attentional control of visual working memory. Percept Psychophys. 2002 Jul; 64(5):754-63.
Score: 0.003
-
Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychol Sci. 2001 May; 12(3):219-24.
Score: 0.003