Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Edward Vogel and Edward Awh.
Connection Strength
6.200
-
Attention: feedback focuses a wandering mind. Nat Neurosci. 2015 Mar; 18(3):327-8.
Score: 0.530
-
The bouncer in the brain. Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan; 11(1):5-6.
Score: 0.323
-
Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul; 18(7):622-8.
Score: 0.312
-
Encoded and updated spatial working memories share a common representational format in alpha activity. iScience. 2024 Feb 16; 27(2):108963.
Score: 0.245
-
Change localization: A highly reliable and sensitive measure of capacity in visual working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul; 85(5):1681-1694.
Score: 0.225
-
Pupillometry signatures of sustained attention and working memory. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Nov; 84(8):2472-2482.
Score: 0.224
-
Sustained Attention and Spatial Attention Distinctly Influence Long-term Memory Encoding. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 09 01; 33(10):2132-2148.
Score: 0.208
-
Perceptual Grouping Reveals Distinct Roles for Sustained Slow Wave Activity and Alpha Oscillations in Working Memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 06 01; 33(7):1354-1364.
Score: 0.204
-
Estimating the statistical power to detect set-size effects in contralateral delay activity. Psychophysiology. 2021 05; 58(5):e13791.
Score: 0.200
-
Attention fluctuations impact ongoing maintenance of information in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Dec; 27(6):1269-1278.
Score: 0.198
-
Multivariate analysis reveals a generalizable human electrophysiological signature of working memory load. Psychophysiology. 2020 12; 57(12):e13691.
Score: 0.196
-
Alpha-band oscillations track the retrieval of precise spatial representations from long-term memory. J Neurophysiol. 2019 08 01; 122(2):539-551.
Score: 0.178
-
Real-time triggering reveals concurrent lapses of attention and working memory. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 08; 3(8):808-816.
Score: 0.178
-
Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory. PLoS Biol. 2019 04; 17(4):e3000239.
Score: 0.177
-
Dissecting the Neural Focus of Attention Reveals Distinct Processes for Spatial Attention and Object-Based Storage in Visual Working Memory. Psychol Sci. 2019 04; 30(4):526-540.
Score: 0.175
-
Corrigendum to "Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory" [Cogn. Psychol. 97 (2017) 79-97]. Cogn Psychol. 2018 12; 107:67.
Score: 0.171
-
Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 08; 30(8):1185-1196.
Score: 0.165
-
Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory. Cogn Psychol. 2017 09; 97:79-97.
Score: 0.156
-
Alpha-Band Oscillations Enable Spatially and Temporally Resolved Tracking of Covert Spatial Attention. Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul; 28(7):929-941.
Score: 0.155
-
The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Mar; 62:100-8.
Score: 0.141
-
The topography of alpha-band activity tracks the content of spatial working memory. J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan 01; 115(1):168-77.
Score: 0.138
-
Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May; 27(5):853-65.
Score: 0.130
-
Induced a rhythms track the content and quality of visual working memory representations with high temporal precision. J Neurosci. 2014 May 28; 34(22):7587-99.
Score: 0.126
-
Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 10; 26(10):2298-309.
Score: 0.125
-
Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar; 14(1):62-77.
Score: 0.124
-
Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jun; 71:1-26.
Score: 0.123
-
A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun; 24(6):929-38.
Score: 0.116
-
Selection and storage of perceptual groups is constrained by a discrete resource in working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun; 39(3):824-835.
Score: 0.112
-
Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing. J Neurosci. 2012 May 23; 32(21):7169-77.
Score: 0.109
-
Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 19; 31(3):1128-38.
Score: 0.100
-
Statistical learning induces discrete shifts in the allocation of working memory resources. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec; 36(6):1419-29.
Score: 0.099
-
Discrete capacity limits in visual working memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr; 20(2):177-82.
Score: 0.094
-
Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb; 20(2):207-14.
Score: 0.087
-
Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb; 15(1):215-22.
Score: 0.081
-
Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28; 139(1):201-8.
Score: 0.070
-
Storage in Visual Working Memory Recruits a Content-Independent Pointer System. Psychol Sci. 2022 10; 33(10):1680-1694.
Score: 0.056
-
Inter-electrode correlations measured with EEG predict individual differences in cognitive ability. Curr Biol. 2021 11 22; 31(22):4998-5008.e6.
Score: 0.052
-
Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory. Cereb Cortex. 2021 06 10; 31(7):3323-3337.
Score: 0.051
-
Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 03; 32(3):558-569.
Score: 0.046