Howard Nusbaum to Pitch Perception
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Howard Nusbaum has written about Pitch Perception.
Connection Strength
4.479
-
Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability. Sci Rep. 2021 07 12; 11(1):14290.
Score: 0.800
-
Individual differences in absolute pitch performance: Contributions of working memory, musical expertise, and tonal language background. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov; 191:251-260.
Score: 0.662
-
A note by any other name: Intonation context rapidly changes absolute note judgments. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Aug; 44(8):1268-1282.
Score: 0.641
-
What the [bleep]? Enhanced absolute pitch memory for a 1000Hz sine tone. Cognition. 2016 09; 154:139-150.
Score: 0.562
-
The effects of acoustic variability on absolute pitch categorization: Evidence of contextual tuning. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jul; 138(1):436-46.
Score: 0.527
-
Absolute pitch may not be so absolute. Psychol Sci. 2013 Aug; 24(8):1496-502.
Score: 0.457
-
Absolute pitch judgments of familiar melodies generalize across timbre and octave. Mem Cognit. 2023 11; 51(8):1898-1910.
Score: 0.227
-
Revisiting discrete versus continuous models of human behavior: The case of absolute pitch. PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0244308.
Score: 0.193
-
Auditory working memory predicts individual differences in absolute pitch learning. Cognition. 2015 Jul; 140:95-110.
Score: 0.130
-
Music can elicit a visual motion aftereffect. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul; 75(5):1039-47.
Score: 0.115
-
Processing interactions between segmental and suprasegmental information in native speakers of English and Mandarin Chinese. Percept Psychophys. 1993 Feb; 53(2):157-65.
Score: 0.111
-
Generalizing across tonal context, timbre, and octave in rapid absolute pitch training. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Feb; 85(2):525-542.
Score: 0.056